Abstract
South Korean cultivators share features with counterparts in both the global south and north. This combination of traits has produced a diversity of sources that underpin a food sovereignty movement. A case study of t’ojong, or native, seed activism illustrates how local systems of meaning and particular constellations of interests make food sovereignty appealing to a broad coalition of farmers, consumers, part-time cultivators, agricultural scientists, and activists for farmers and for women. The country’s experience demonstrates that responses to market encroachment on food production provide only part of the force driving food sovereignty movements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
An exception is Burmeister and Choi (2012).
The information in this paragraph was presented by a lawyer-activist at a “T’ojong Seed Policy Panel” organized by the group Giving T’ojong Seeds, 1 Feb. 2020.
Seoul Urban Farming website, 12 Dec. 2019, https://cityfarmer.seoul.go.kr/brd/view.do?nttSn=1244&key=1905228807693&pageIndex=1&sc=&sw=&tr_code=sweb, last accessed 10 Oct. 2020.
Kyŏnggi Province Support Centre for Return Farmers website, online at https://www.refarmgg.or.kr/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?nttId=284&bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000141, last accessed 15 Oct. 2020.
South Kyŏngsang Agriculture Resource Centre website, https://www.gyeongnam.go.kr/seed/index.gyeong?menuCd=DOM_000001004002002000, last accessed 19 Dec. 2020.
Abbreviations
- FPA:
-
Female peasants’ association
- FTA:
-
Free trade agreement
- GMO:
-
Genetically-modified organism
- LVC:
-
La via campesina
- RDA:
-
Rural development administration
- TRIPS:
-
Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights
- UPOV:
-
International union for the protection of new varieties of plants
- WTO:
-
World trade organization
References
Abelmann, N. 1996. Echoes of the past, epics of dissent: A South Korean social movement. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Alkon, A.H., and T.M. Mares. 2012. Food sovereignty in US food movements: Radical visions and neoliberal constraints. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (3): 347–359.
An, W.-S. 2009. Han’guk t’ojong changmul chawŏn togam [Korea’s native crops]. Seoul: IU.
Brent, Z.W., C.M. Schiavoni, and A. Alonso-Fradejas. 2015. Contextualising food sovereignty: The politics of convergence among movements in the USA. Third World Quarterly 36 (3): 618–635.
Burmeister, L.L., and Y. Choi. 2012. Food sovereignty movement activism in South Korea: National policy impacts? Agricultural Human Values 29: 247–258.
Calvário, R. 2017. Food sovereignty and new peasantries: On re-peasantization and counter-hegemonic contestations in the Basque territory. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (2): 402–420.
Chang, K.-S. 2010. South Korea under compressed modernity: Familial political economy in transition. London: Routledge.
Clendenning, J., H.D. Wolfram, and C. Richards. 2015. Food justice or food sovereignty? Understanding the rise of urban food movements in the USA. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (1): 165–177.
Cumings, B. 1984. The origins and development of the northeast Asian political economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences. International Organization 38 (1): 1–40.
Desmarais, A.A., and H. Wittman. 2014. Farmers, foodies and first nations: Getting to food sovereignty in Canada. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1153–1173.
Dhar, B. 2002. Sui generis systems for plant variety protection. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office.
Grey, S., and R. Patel. 2014. Food sovereignty as decolonization: Some contributions from indigenous movements to food system and development politics. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (3): 431–444.
Gupta, S. 2020. Asian women’s seed saving movements: focusing on South Korea’s KWPA and India’s Navdanya. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean).
Kim, S. 2000. Changing lifestyles and consumption patterns of the South Korean middle class and new generations. In Consumption in Asia: Lifestyles and identities, ed. B. Chua, 61–81. New York: Routledge.
Kim, K. 2015. Rice cuisine and cultural practice in contemporary Korean dietary life. In Re-orienting cuisine: East Asian foodways in the twenty-first century, ed. K. Kim, 71–88. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Kim, I. 2016. Land reform in South Korea under the U.S. military occupation, 1945–1948. Journal of Cold War Studies 18 (2): 97–129.
Kim, S.-K. 2018. T’ojong ssiat ŭi yŏksŭp [The counterattack of native seeds]. Seoul: Tŭlnyŏk.
Kong, S.-K. 2014. Pŏp kwa in’gwŏn ŭi mannam: Han’guk nongmin undong ŭi ch’ogukjŏk chŏllyak [When law and human rights meet: The transnational strategy of Korean farmer activism]. Kukje Kaebal Hyŏmnyŏk Yŏn’gu 6 (2): 73–97.
Lee, N. 2007. The making of Minjung. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lewis, L.S. 2002. Commemorating Kwangju: The 5.18 movement and civil society at the millennium. In Korean society: Civil society, democracy, and the state, ed. C.K. Armstrong, 165–186. New York: Routledge.
Martinez-Torres, M.E., and P.M. Rosset. 2010. La vía campesina: The birth and evolution of a transnational social movement. Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 149–175.
Oh, J., and S. Kim. 2017. Enhancing urban agriculture through participants’ satisfaction: The case of Seoul, Korea. Land Use Policy 69: 123–133.
Peschard, K., and S. Randeria. 2020. ‘Keeping seeds in our hands’: The rise of seed activism. Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (4): 613–647.
Ryu, H., J.S. Lee, and S. Lee. 2018. Participatory neighborhood revitalization effects on social capital: Evidence from community building projects in Seoul. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 144 (1): 4017–4025.
Schiavoni, C.M. 2016. The contested terrain of food sovereignty construction: Toward a historical, relational and interactive approach. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (1): 1–32.
Suh, J. 2019. Environmental characteristics of urban-rural farming migrants in the Republic of Korea and their significance for rural sustainability. Local Environment 24 (8): 663–677.
Sun, Y. 2008. The docking of science and politics: Converting a scientist`s breeding research into the president`s ‘Tongil rice.’ Journal of the Korean History of Science Society 30 (2): 417–439 (in Korean).
Trauger, A. 2014. Toward a political geography of food sovereignty: Transforming territory, exchange and power in the liberal sovereign state. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1131–1152.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their interest and helpful comments. This research was supported by the Korean Studies Grant Program of the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2019-R25). The paper benefited from feedback at workshops in Bornholm, Copenhagen, and Kaohsiung, as well as in the Back to the Land course organized by Konstfack University. Jamie S. Davidson suggested the title and gave comments on earlier drafts. Anders Riel Muller was a source of helpful perspectives on Korean nationalism and food. Erik Mobrand gave invaluable feedback on multiple drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H. South and/or north: an indigenous seed movement in South Korea and the multiple bases of food sovereignty. Agric Hum Values 39, 521–533 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10263-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10263-5