Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Grasping practices of self-reliance within alternative foodscapes in Flanders

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foodscapes, the ways and places in which human beings interact with food, are dominated by the global agri-food system. In many ways, it has never been easier to access such varieties or quantities of food. Be it in restaurants, supermarkets or local markets, food is often only a quick purchase away from the plate. In spite of that, there are persons who choose to follow alternative paths, moving away from reliance on the conventional system by engaging in practices of food self-reliance. In this paper, using the analytical lenses of behavioural, social innovation and social practice theories, we explore why and how people strive for self-reliance and self-governing their foodscapes. We apply these lenses to data gathered from site visits and in-depth interviews with those engaged in self-reliant practices in Flanders. The practices we encountered range from permaculture to transition towns and illustrate the diverse alternative foodscapes found in Flanders. Our research reveals that while practices—and the people who engage in them—may at first appear distinct, they have commonalities as well, including similar values, needs, goals and more. These diverse elements combine to create, reshape and sustain practices within foodscapes. By further understanding the motivational, biogeophysical and social underpinnings that enable them we reveal a diverse, yet connected, continuum of practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S. 2015. Simplicity. In Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era, ed. G. D'Alisa, F. Demaria, G. Kallis, pp. 133–136. Routledge.

  • Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1986. Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist 41 (12): 1389–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., and N. Adams. 1977. Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1 (4): 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01663995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., and S. Miller. 2008. The impacts of local markets: A review of research on farmers markets and community supported agriculture (CSA). American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (5): 1298–1302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01220.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N., and K. Reynolds. 2015. Resource needs for a socially just and sustainable urban agriculture system: Lessons from New York City. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30 (1): 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170514000210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, C.A., and A. Myhre. 2000. Community-supported agriculture: A sustainable alternative to industrial agriculture? Human Organization 59 (2): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.59.2.715203t206g2j153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crivits, M., and E. Paredis. 2013. Designing an explanatory practice framework: Local food systems as a case. Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (3): 306–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513484321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, E., P. Schmidt, and S.H. Schwartz. 2008. Bringing values back. In: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (3): 420–445.

  • Ericksen, P.J. 2008. Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change 18 (1): 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. 2016. Global foodscapes: Oppression and resistance in the life of food. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, V.V., T.L. Milfont, and V.M. Guerra. 2014. The functional theory of human values: From intentional overlook to first acknowledgement—A reply to Schwartz (2014). Personality and Individual Differences 68: 250–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., A. Biro, and N. Mackendrick. 2009. Lost in the supermarket: The corporate-organic foodscape and the struggle for food democracy. Antipode 41 (3): 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00685.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, A., and E. Mathijs. 2014. (De)politicising the local: The case of the Transition Towns movement in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Rural Studies 34: 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, H. 2001. Differentiating multiple meanings of garden and community. Urban Geography 22 (7): 656–670. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.22.7.656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackendrick, N. 2014. Foodscape. American Sociological Association 13 (3): 16–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504214545754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathijs, E. 2012. Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained world. The futures of agriculture. Brief No. 01—English. Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR), Rome

  • Mehmood, A., and C. Parra. 2013. Social innovation in an unsustainable world. In The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, ed. F. Moulaert, D. McCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 53–66. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, B.E. 2011. Images of foodscapes: Introduction to foodscape studies and their application in the study of healthy eating out-of-home environments. Royal Society for Public Health 131 (5): 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913911415150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. 2003. In the sweat of our brow: Citizenship in American domestic practice during WWII—Victory Gardens. The Journal of American Culture 26 (3): 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1542-734X.00100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch. 2013a. General introduction: The return of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice. In The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, ed. F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 1–6. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., D. MacCallum, and J. Hillier. 2013b. Social innovation: Intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, ed. F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 13–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nevens, F., E. Mathijs, and P. Vandenbroeck. 2017. From systematic to systemic: an experiment in systems analysis for agriculture and food. AgroEcological Transitions. https://doi.org/10.18174/407609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, A. 2018. “We will not perish; We’re going to keep flourishing”: Race, food access, and geographies of self-reliance. Antipode 50 (2): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, C. 2018. Global foodscapes: Oppression and resistance in the life of food, by A Fraser. Irish Geography 51 (1): 139–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, TR. 2011. Where the action is (on large social phenomena such as sociotechnical regimes). Sustainable Practices Research Group, Working Paper 1

  • Schatzki, T.R. 2012. A primer on practices. Practice-based education, 13–26. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H., J. Cieciuch, M. Vecchione, E. Davidov, R. Fischer, C. Beierlein, et al. 2012. Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103 (4): 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekulova, F. 2015. Happiness. In Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era, ed. G. D'Alisa, F. Demaria, G. Kallis, pp. 113–116. Routledge.

  • Sonnino, R. 2016. Food and the city: Understanding the new urban foodscapes. Presented at: Invited Lecture, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, 12 January 2016.

  • Sonnino, R., and T. Marsden. 2005. Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (2): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, R and Marsden, T. 2006. Alternative Food Networks in the South West of England: Towards a New Agrarian Eco-Economy? In Marsden, Terry, Murdoch, Jonathan† (ed.) Between the local and the global. Research in rural sociology and development, 12: 299–322 Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Spijker, S.N., and C. Parra. 2018. Knitting green spaces with the threads of social innovation in Groningen and London. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (5–6): 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1382338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (ed.). 2010. Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. 1890. Les lois de l'imitation. Paris: Félix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.J., R. Bogdan, and M. DeVault. 2015. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Permaculture Activist https://www.permacultureactivist.net/articles/articles.htm

  • Veteto, J.R., and J. Lockyer. 2008. Environmental anthropology engaging permaculture: Moving theory and practice toward sustainability. Anthro Source 30 (1–2): 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. 2011a. Environmental reviews and case studies: D-town farm: African American resistance to food insecurity and the transformation of Detroit. Environmental Practice 13 (4): 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046611000408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. 2011b. Sisters of the soil: Urban gardening as resistance in Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 5 (1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2979/racethmulglocon.5.1.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, T.H. 2003. World War II poster campaigns: Preaching frugality to American consumers. Journal of Advertising 32 (1): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Nuria Spijker.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spijker, S.N., Mathijs, E. & Parra, C. Grasping practices of self-reliance within alternative foodscapes in Flanders. Agric Hum Values 37, 819–832 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10021-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10021-z

Keywords

Navigation