Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How wage structure and crop size negatively impact farmworker livelihoods in monocrop organic production: interviews with strawberry harvesters in California

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because organic certification standards institutionalized a product-based rather than process-based definition, certified organic produce can be grown on large-scale industrial monocrop farms. Besides toxicity of inputs, these farms operate in much the same way as conventional production. Scholars emphasize the fact that labor rights have been left out of certification criteria, and because of that, organic farms reproduce the same labor relations as conventional. Empirical studies of organic farm labor, however, rely primarily on the perspective of farmers. In this study, I ask the farmworkers themselves how harvesting on organic farms compares to conventional, and found that working in organic negatively impacts farmworker livelihoods. Qualitative interviews with 36 strawberry harvesters in Oxnard, California reveal that farmworkers make more money in conventional strawberry production because of the interaction between wage structure and size of the berry. Conventional strawberries are larger and therefore fewer of them fill up a box. Farmworkers routinely pick more boxes in conventional than in organic, thus earning more, since under the piece rate system, farmworkers are paid per box. With short-term economic survival rather than long-term occupational health concerns in mind, strawberry harvesters would rather work on conventional farms because “la fresa orgánica es más chiquita” (organic strawberries are smaller).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of the thirteen growers in her sample that employ more than three-quarters of their workforce year-round, 11 were all organic while only two were mixed organic. For all organic, 14% of growers sampled provide year-round employment for at least 75% of their workforce, whereas only 3% of mixed organic growers do.

  2. All names are pseudonyms.

  3. This self-determination ethic has also been found by Sarah Bronwyn Horton (2016) in her work with farmworkers in the Central Valley.

  4. Triqui farmworkers are highlighted in Seth Holmes’ (2013) ethnography of farm labor in Washington state, while in California, most indigenous Oaxacans are Mixtec and Zapotec.

Abbreviations

USDA:

United States Department of Agriculture

EFI:

Ethical food initiative

References

  • Alkon, A.H., and J. Guthman (eds.). 2017. The new food activism: Opposition, cooperation, and collective action. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkon, A.H., and C.G. McCullen. 2011. Whiteness and farmers markets: Performances, perpetuations…contestations? Antipode 43 (4): 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, A. 2016. Legacies of inequality: How hometown political participation and land distribution shape migrants’ paths into wage labor. World Development 87 (1): 318–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, A.L. 2018. Undocumented politics: Place, gender, and the pathways of Mexican migrants. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., and C. Getz. 2011. Farmworker food insecurity and the production of hunger in California. In Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability, ed. A.H. Alkon and J. Agyeman, 121–146. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L.F. 2015. The changing politics of organic food in North America. Cheltenham: Edward Elger Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, P., R.T. Edwards, B. Hounsome, and G. Edwards-Jones. 2008. Comparative assessment of migrant farm worker health in conventional and organic horticultural systems in the United Kingdom. Science of the Total Environment 391 (1): 55–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyer, B., and J. Bingen. 2014. Organic and non-organic farming: Is convergence possible? Research in Rural Sociology and Development 21 (1): 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R. 2013. The moral economy is a double-edged sword: Explaining farmers’ earnings and self-exploitation in community-supported agriculture. Economic Geography 89 (4): 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, C., S. Brown, and A. Shreck. 2008. Class politics and agricultural exceptionalism in California’s organic agriculture movement. Politics & Society 36 (1): 478–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 2000. Organic and conventional agriculture: Materializing discourse and agro-ecological managerialism. Agriculture and Human Values 17 (1): 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. 2014. Labor and the locavore: The making of a comprehensive food ethic. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2017. Paradoxes of the border: Labor shortages and farmworker minor agency in reworking California’s strawberry fields. Economic Geography 93 (1): 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.L. 2011. Pesticide drift and the pursuit of environmental justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.L. 2017. Taking a different tack: Pesticide regulatory-reform activism in California. In The new food activism: opposition, cooperation, and collective action, ed. A.H. Alkon and J. Guthman, 31–54. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.L., and C. Getz. 2015. Farm size and job quality: Mixed-methods studies of hired farm work in California and Wisconsin. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (4): 617–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. 2013. Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, S.B. 2016. They leave their kidneys in the fields: Illness, injury, and illegality among U.S. farmworkers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, K. 2000. Labour, livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe. Biological, Agriculture & Horticulture: An International Journal for Sustainable Production Systems 17 (3): 247–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. 2000. Transnational Oaxacan indigenous identity: The case of Mixtecs and Zapotecs. Identities 7 (2): 173–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresge, L. 2007. Indigenous Oaxacan communities in California: An overview. Davis: California Institute for Rural Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, A.A. 2007. The farmworkers’ journey. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, A.E., S. Young, C.M. Crespi, R.R. Vega, R.T. Cayetano, and R. Bastani. 2015. Social determinants of health in the Mixtec and Zapotec community in Ventura County, California. International Journal for Equity in Health 14 (16): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J.A. 2015. Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Agriculture and Human Values 32 (1): 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mines, R., S. Nichols, and D. Runsten. 2010. California’s indigenous farmworkers. San Francisco: California Rural Legal Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff-Zern, L.A. 2014. Challenging the agrarian imaginary: Farmworker-led food movements and the potential for farm labor justice. Human Geography 7 (1): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff-Zern, L.A. 2017. Farmworker-led food movements then and now: United Farm Workers, the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, and the potential for farm labor justice. In The new food activism: Opposition, cooperation, and collective action, ed. A.H. Alkon and J. Guthman, 157–178. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison, J., R. Hine, and J. Pretty. 2005. Survey and analysis of labour on organic farms in the UK and Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 3 (1): 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obach, B.K. 2017. Organic struggle: The movement for sustainable agriculture in the United States. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgeram, R. 2011. ‘The only thing that isn’t sustainable…is the farmer’: Social sustainability and the politics of class among Pacific Northwest farmers engaged in sustainable farming. Rural Sociology 76 (3): 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbicca, J. 2015. Food labor, economic inequality, and the imperfect politics of process in the alternative food movement. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (4): 675–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreck, A., C. Getz, and G. Feenstra. 2006. Social sustainability, farm labor, and organic agriculture: Findings from an exploratory analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 23 (4): 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, L. 2007. Transborder lives: indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California, and Oregon. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Venkat, K. 2012. Comparison of twelve organic and conventional farming systems: A life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36 (6): 620–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura County Civic Alliance. 2017. State of the region report.

  • Zaunbrecher, V., D. Hattis, R. Melnick, S. Kegley, T. Malloy, and J. Froines. 2016. Exposure and interaction: The potential health impacts of using multiple pesticides. Los Angeles: UCLA Sustainable Technology and Policy Program.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Soper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soper, R. How wage structure and crop size negatively impact farmworker livelihoods in monocrop organic production: interviews with strawberry harvesters in California. Agric Hum Values 37, 325–336 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09989-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09989-0

Keywords

Navigation