Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies for scaling out impacts from agricultural systems change: the case of forages and livestock production in Laos

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scaling out and up are terms increasingly being used to describe a desired expansion of beneficial impacts from agricultural research and rural development. This paper explores strategies for scaling out production and livelihood impacts from proven technologies. We draw on a case study of forages and livestock production in Laos, a Southeast Asian country undergoing rapid economic and agricultural change. A facilitated learning environment stimulated farmers to adapt forages, livestock housing, and animal health practices to their own situations (scaling out). Regular follow-up visits and on-the-job mentoring for extension staff provided institutional support (scaling up). Within 5 years, the number of villages and households using forages and fattening livestock had increased six fold, with a 50% reduction in the time required for farmers to get significant benefits. The paper concludes that scaling out positive impacts from systems change requires field tested and proven technologies, evidence of significant livelihood impacts, fostering of local innovation, competent field staff, effective peer learning, and ongoing institutional support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

CGIAR:

Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

CIAT:

International Centre for Tropical Agriculture

CSU:

Charles Sturt University

FLSP:

Forages and Livestock Systems Project

FSP:

Forages for Smallholders Project

IIRR:

International Institute for Rural Reconstruction

LAO PDR:

Lao Peoples Democratic Republic

NAFES:

National Agriculture and Forestry Extension Service

NGO:

Non-governmental organization

PRE:

Participatory research and extension

References

  • Anderson, J.R., G. Feder, and S. Ganguly. 2006. The rise and fall of training and visit (T&V) extension: An Asian mini-drama with an African dialogue. In Changing roles of agricultural extension in Asian nations, ed. A.W. Van den Ban and R.K. Samantra, 149–172. New Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, V., S. Foerster, K. Pasteur, M. Pimbert, G. Pratt, and I.L. Arroyo. 2000. Transforming bureaucracies: Institutionalising participation and people-centered processes in natural resource management—an annotated bibliography. London: IIED and IDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J., C. Velasco, F. Rodriguez, R. Oros, R. Botello, M. Webb, A. Devaux, and G. Thiele. 2007. Unspoken demands for farm technology. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 5 (1): 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S.E., and B. Currie-Alder. 2006. Scaling up natural resource management: Insights from research in Latin America. Development in Practice 16 (2): 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cary, J., T. Webb, and N. Barr. 2002. Understanding landholders’ capacity to change to sustainable practices: Insights about practice adoption and social capacity for change. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. 2005. Reversals, institutions, and change. In The Earthscan reader in sustainable agriculture, ed. J. Pretty, 135–147. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). 2008. The world factbook. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/la.html. Accessed 24 February 2008.

  • Connell, J., and O. Pathammavong. 2007. Starting an agro-enterprise development process: A field facilitators guide. Unpublished report. Vientiane: CIAT Asia.

  • CSD NGO, Commission for Sustainable Development NGO Steering Committee. 2008. Scaling up sustainable agriculture initiatives. Highlights and synthesis of proceedings of the CGIAR NGO committee workshop. http://csdngo.igc.org/agriculture/agr_scalingup.htm. Accessed 25 February 2008.

  • Douthwaite, B., S. Schulz, A.S. Olanrewaju, and J. Ellis-Jones. 2007. Impact pathway evaluation of an integrated Striga hermonthica control project in Northern Nigeria. Agricultural Systems 92 (1–3): 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka, S. 1994. Learning from six reasons why farmers do not adopt innovation intended to improve sustainability of upland agriculture. Agricultural Systems 46: 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, Y. 2006. Understanding the history of change in Laos: An important premise for development efforts. Mountain Research and Development 26 (3): 197–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, S. 2004. Scaling up community-driven development: A synthesis of experience. FCND Discussion Paper No. 181. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • GOL (Government of Lao). 2005. National growth and poverty eradication strategy. Vientiane: GOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundel, S., J. Hancock, and S. Anderson. 2001. Scaling-up strategies for research in natural resource management: A comparative review. Chatham: Natural Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, L., J. White, P. Grace, D. Hodson, A.D. Hartkamp, C. Vaughan, and C. Meisner. 2001. Delivering the goods: Scaling out results of natural resource management research. Conservation Ecology 5 (2): 19. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art19.

  • Horne, P.M. 2005. FLSP activity completion report to AusAid. Vientiane: CIAT Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, P.M., and W.W. Stur. 2003. Developing agricultural solutions with smallholder farmers—how to get started with participatory approaches. ACIAR Monograph No. 99. Canberra: ACIAR.

  • IIRR. 2000. Going to scale: Can we bring more benefits to more people more quickly?. Silang, Cavite, Philippines: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, Y.C. James Yen Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiptot, E., P. Hebinck, S. Franzel, and P. Richards. 2007. Adopters, testers or pseudo-adopters? Dynamics of the use of improved tree fallows by farmers in western Kenya. Agricultural Systems 94 (2): 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolavalli, S., and J. Kerr. 2002. Scaling up participatory watershed development in India. Development and Change 33 (2): 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendham, E., J. Millar, and A. Curtis. 2007. Landholder participation in native vegetation management in irrigation areas. Journal of Ecological Restoration and Management 8 (1): 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J., and A. Curtis. 1999. Challenging the boundaries of local and scientific knowledge: Opportunities for developing temperate pasture systems in Australia. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J., V. Photakoun, and J. Connell. 2005. Scaling out impacts: A study of three methods for introducing forage technologies to villages in Laos. ACIAR Working Paper No. 58. Canberra: ACIAR.

  • Ojiem, J.O., N. De Ridder, B. VanLauwe, and K.E. Giller. 2006. Socio-ecological niche: A conceptual framework for integration of legumes in smallholder farming systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4 (1): 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachico, D., and S. Fujisaka. ed. 2004. Scaling up and out: Achieving widespread impact through agricultural research. CIAT Publication 340. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.

  • Pannell, D.J., G.R. Marshall, N. Barr, A. Curtis, F. Vanclay, and R. Wilkinson. 2006. Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation technologies by rural landholders. Australasian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46: 1407–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phengsavanh, P., V. Phimpachanhvongsod, and P. Horne. 2004. Livestock intensification: Forage and livestock technologies for complex upland systems. In Poverty reduction, shifting cultivation stabilization in the uplands of Laos: Technologies, approaches, methods for improving upland livelihoods, ed. B. Bouahom, A. Glendinning, S. Nilsson, and M. Victor, 78–85. Vientiane: NAFRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. 2002. Agri-culture: Reconnecting people, land, and nature. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., J. Morison, and R. Hine. 2005. Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries. In The Earthscan reader in sustainable agriculture, ed. J. Pretty, 375–398. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. 2003. The diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roothaert, R., and S. Kaaria. 2004. Issues and strategies for going to scale: A case study of the forages for smallholders project in the Philippines. In Scaling up and out: Achieving widespread impact through agricultural research, ed. D. Pachio and S. Fujisaka, 71–92. CIAT Publication 340. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.

  • Scoones, I., and J. Thompson (eds.). 1994. Beyond farmer first: Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research, and extension practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snapp, S., and K.L. Heong. 2003. Scaling up and out. In Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods: Uniting science, participation, ed. P. Pound, S. Snapp, C. McDougall, and A. Braun, 67–83. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stur, W., D. Gray, and G. Bastin. 2002a. Review of the livestock sector in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Prepared for the Asian Development Bank. Manila, Philippines: International Livestock Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stur, W.W., P.M. Horne, F.A. Gabunada, P. Phengsavanh, and P. Kerridge. 2002b. Forage options for smallholder crop-animal systems in Southeast Asia: Working with farmers to find solutions. Agricultural Systems 71 (1–2): 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. 1995. Participatory approaches in government bureaucracies: Facilitating the process of institutional change. World Development 23 (9): 1521–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thongmanivong, S., and Y. Fujita. 2006. Recent land use and livelihood transitions in northern Laos. Mountain Research and Development 26 (3): 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Ban, A.W., and R.K. Samantra (eds.). 2006. Changing roles of agricultural extension in Asian nations. Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Mele, P. 2006. Zooming-in zooming-out: A novel method to scale up local innovations and sustainable technologies. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4 (2): 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, B.B., A. Cadelina, A. Cardano, and E. Visitacion. 1999. Community history and rural development: Why some farmers participate more readily than others. Agricultural Systems 59 (2): 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2003. Scaling-up the impact of good practices in rural development. A working paper to support implementation of the World Bank’s rural development strategy. Report No. 26031. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://go.worldbank.org/67MZA7JQ50. Accessed 12 April 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia

    Joanne Millar

  2. CIAT International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, PO Box 6766, Vientiane, Laos

    John Connell

Authors
  1. Joanne Millar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Connell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne Millar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millar, J., Connell, J. Strategies for scaling out impacts from agricultural systems change: the case of forages and livestock production in Laos. Agric Hum Values 27, 213–225 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9194-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9194-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation