Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Designing sustainable agriculture education: Academics’ suggestions for an undergraduate curriculum at a land grant university

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, land grant universities and their colleges of agriculture have been discipline driven in both their curricula and research agendas. Critics call for interdisciplinary approaches to undergraduate curriculum. Concomitantly, sustainable agriculture (SA) education is beginning to emerge as a way to address many complex social and environmental problems. University of California at Davis faculty, staff, and students are developing an undergraduate SA major. To inform this process, a web-based Delphi survey of academics working in fields related to SA was conducted. Faculty from colleges and universities across the US were surveyed. Participants suggested that students needed knowledge of natural and social science disciplines relating to the agri-food system. In addition, stakeholders suggested students learn through experiences that link the classroom to field work, engaging a broad range of actors within applied settings. Stakeholders also emphasized the need for interdisciplinary and applied scholarship. Additionally, they proposed a range of teaching and learning approaches, including many practical experiences. Given the diverse suggestions of content knowledge and means of producing knowledge, the survey presented unique challenges and called into question the epistemological and pedagogical norms currently found in land grant colleges of agriculture. This study has implications for land grant universities seeking to develop undergraduate curriculum appropriate to the field of SA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LGCA :

Land grant colleges of agriculture

SA:

Sustainable agriculture

References

  • Allen P. (1993) Connecting the social and the ecological in sustainable agriculture. In P. Allen (ed.), Food for the Future (pp. 1–16). New York: Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen P., D. V. Dusen, J. Lundy, S. Gliessman (1991). Expanding the definition of sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6(1): 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri M. A. (1998). Beyond agroecology: Making sustainable agriculture part of political agenda. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3(4): 142–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L. H. (1905). “Recent problems in agriculture: What a university farm is for.” University of California Agricultural Experiment Station (p. 4). Circular No. 15. Berkeley: University of California Press

  • Bawden, R. (1990). “Of agricultural systems and systems agriculture: Systems methodologies in agricultural education.” In J. G. W. Jones (ed.), Systems Theory Applied to Agriculture and the Food Chain (Chapter 12). Davis, California: P.R. Street

  • Bawden, R. (1996). “A learning approach to sustainable agriculture and rural development: Reflections from Hawkesbury.” In FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), Training for Agricultural and Rural Development, 1995–96. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/sd/EXdirect/EXan0010.htm on February 28, 2006

  • Boyer Commission. (1998). Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Learning. Retrieved from http://www.naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/ on February 28, 2006

  • Busch L., W. B. Lacy (1983). Science, Agriculture, and the Politics of Research. Boulder, Colorado: Westview

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A 30-year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17(S1): S11–S58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. (1916) Democracy and Education. New York: MacMillan Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: MacMillan Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd edition. New York: Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitri, C. and C. Greene (2002). Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic foods market, USDA Economic Research Service, Agricultural Information Bulletin number AIB777. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture

  • Francis C., G. Leiblein, J. Helenius, L. Salomonsson, H. Olsen, J. Porter (2001). Challenges in designing ecological agriculture education: A Nordic perspective on change. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 16(2): 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis C., G. Lieblein, S. Gliessman, T. A. Breland, N. Creamer, L. Harwood, L. Salomonsson, J. Helenius, D. Rickerl, R. Salvador, M. Wiedenhoeft, S. Simmons, P. Allen, M. Altieri, C. Flora, R. Poincelot (2003). Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22(3): 99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H. (1990). The difficulties of school: Probable causes, possible cures. Daedalus 119(2): 85–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman S. R. (1998). Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Ann Arbor Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten H. D., M. L. Risius (2004). Development of an interdisciplinary agroecology major with input from surveys of students, graduates, and employers. The NACTA Journal 48(1): 58–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities (1999). Returning to Our Roots: The Engaged Institution. Battle Creek, Michigan: W. K. Kellogg Foundation

  • Kerr, C. (2001). The Gold and the Blue: A Personal Memoir of the University of California, 1949–1967, Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press

  • King, A. (2003). “CA & ES currents; A message from Dean Van Alfen.” Sustainable Agriculture Town Hall Meeting, July 25, 2003. Davis, California: UC Davis College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

  • Kliebard H. M. (1995). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, K., L. Tourte, R. Kozloff, and B. Shouse (2002). A Statistical Picture of California’s Organic Agriculture, 1995–1998. DANR Publication 3425. Davis: University of California Agriculture Issues Center

  • Kolb D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, H. (1992). “Overview.” In National Research Council Board on Agriculture, Agriculture and the Undergraduate (pp. 1–15).Washington, DC: National Academy Press

  • LaMay C. L. (2001). Justin Smith Morrill and the politics and legacy of the land-grant college acts. In: L. K. Grossman, N. N. Minow (eds.), A Digital Gift to the Nation: Fulfilling the Promise of the Digital and Internet Age (pp. 73–95). New York: The Century Foundation Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. (1992). One more turn after the social turn. In E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimensions of Science (pp. 272–294). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieblein G., E. Ostergaard, C. Francis (2004). Becoming an agroecologist through action education. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2(3): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae R. J., S. B. Hill, J. Hennings, G. R. Mehuys (1989) Agricultural science and sustainable agriculture: A review of the existing scientific barriers to sustainable food production and potential solutions. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 6(3): 173–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill Act. (1862). Thirty-Seventh U.S. Congress, Session II, Chapter 130. Retrieved from http://www.memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=012/llsl012.db&recNum=534 on April 23, 2007

  • NRC (National Research Council). (1989). Alternative Agriculture. Committee on the Role of Alternative Farming Methods in Modern Production Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). (1991). Toward Sustainability: A Plan for Collaborative Research on Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). (1996). Colleges of Agriculture at the Land Grant Universities: Public Service and Public Policy. Committee on the Future of the Colleges of Agriculture in the Land Grant University System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr D., M. Van Horn (2006). Development of organic and sustainable agricultural education at the University of California, Davis: A closer look at practice and theory. HortTechnology 16(3): 426–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner G. J. (1995). Analyzing the Curriculum. San Francisco, California: McGraw-Hill, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23(8): 1247–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röling N. G., M. A. E. Wagemakers (1998). Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge, United Kimgdom: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon D. S. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A. N. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp L. A. (2002). Fruits of Progress: Growing Sustainable Farming and Food Systems. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture). (2000). Educational and Training Opportunities in Sustainable Agriculture, 13th edition. Beltsville, Maryland: USDA, Agricultural Research Service

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mark Van Horn, Kristin Reynolds and other members of the University of California, Davis Sustainability Curriculum Workgroup for their contributions. We also thank the anonymous referees, and the editors, including Dr. Laura DeLind of Michigan State University, for their constructive comments and inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural and Environmental Education, School of Education, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA

    Damian M. Parr, Cary J. Trexler & Bryce T. Battisti

  2. International Agriculture Development, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA

    Navina R. Khanna

Authors
  1. Damian M. Parr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cary J. Trexler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Navina R. Khanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bryce T. Battisti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian M. Parr.

Additional information

Damian M. Parr is a doctoral student of Agricultural and Environmental Education, in the School of Education at the University of California at Davis. His professional interests include organic farming, sustainable agriculture, experiential and transformational learning, critical pedagogy, and participatory action research. He is currently working on linking on-campus student initiated sustainable farm and food systems projects to curricula at land grant universities

Cary J. Trexler is an assistant professor of Agricultural and Environmental Education at the University of California at Davis where he teaches courses in the history of agricultural education, experiential learning, and research methods for practicing teachers. His research focuses on experiential learning, sustainable agriculture education, and needs of teachers and informal educators within the context of the agri-food system

Navina R. Khanna is a graduate student pursuing an MS in International Agricultural Development at the University of California at Davis. She is committed to facilitating community dialogue and education about sustainability issues. Her work at the university focuses on the process and goal of sustainability in agricultural education and campus food system sustainability. Her primary professional interests include democratic participatory process in agri-food system sustainability and urban revitalization

Bryce T. Battisti is a doctoral student of Agricultural and Environmental Education, in the School of Education at the University of California at Davis. His research interests include the development of alternative models for university education that are founded on student-centered experiential learning. Specifically, he studies models of permaculture education that lead toward accredited degrees and relates these models to sustainable agriculture degree programs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parr, D.M., Trexler, C.J., Khanna, N.R. et al. Designing sustainable agriculture education: Academics’ suggestions for an undergraduate curriculum at a land grant university. Agric Hum Values 24, 523–533 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-007-9084-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-007-9084-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation