Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reasons for converting to organic farming have been studied in a number of instances. However, the underlying rationale that motivates the behavior is not always made clear. This study aims to provide a detailed picture of farmers’ decision-making and illustrate the choice between organic and conventional farm management. Based on 21 interviews with farmers, a decision-tree highlighting the reasons and constraints involved in the decision of farmers to use, or not to use, organic production techniques was formulated. The accuracy of the decision-tree was tested through a written survey of 65 randomly sampled farmers. The decision-tree permits the identification of decision criteria and examines the decision-making process of farmers in choosing their farming method. It also allows for the characterization of farmer strategies and values, identifying five types of farmers: the “committed conventional;” the “pragmatic conventional;” the “environment-conscious but not organic;” the “pragmatic organic;” and the “committed organic.” The importance of taking into account heterogeneity in farmers’ attitudes, preferences, and goals and their impact on the choice of a farming method is emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Austin I. Deary J. Willock (2001) ArticleTitle“Personality and intelligence as predictors of economic behaviour in Scottish farmers”. European Journal of Personality 15 123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Beedell T. Rehman (2000) ArticleTitle“Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behaviour”. Journal of Rural Studies 16 IssueID1 117–127 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00043-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Beus R. Dunlap (1990) ArticleTitle“Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate”. Rural Sociology 55 IssueID4 590–616 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1549-0831.1990.tb00699.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Buck C. Getz J. Guthman (1997) ArticleTitle“From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California”. Sociologia Ruralis 37 IssueID1 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Burton D. Rigby T. Young (1999) ArticleTitle“Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 IssueID1 47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Darnhofer R. Gretzmacher W. Schneeberger (1997) ArticleTitle“Modelling farmers’ decisions: A comparison between HDM and CART for oats-vetch adoption in the Ethiopian Highlands”. Die Bodenkultur 48 IssueID4 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Darnhofer M. Eder W. Schneeberger (2003) ArticleTitle“Modellrechnungen zur Umstellung einer Ackerbauregion auf Biolandbau” (Estimating the economic impact of the conversion of a cash-crop region to organic farming). Berichte über Landwirtschaft 81 IssueID1 57–73

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Drake P. Bergström H. Svedsäter (1999) “Farmers’ attitudes and uptake” G. van Huylenbroeck M. Whitby (Eds) Countryside Stewardship: Farmers, Policies and Markets Elsevier Science Amsterdam, The Netherlands 89–111

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Duram (2000) ArticleTitle“Agent’s perceptions of structure: How Illinois organic farmers view political, economic, social, and ecological factors” Agriculture and Human Values 17 IssueID1 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Duram (1999) ArticleTitle“Factors in organic farmers’ decision-making: Diversity, challenge and obstacles” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14 IssueID1 2–10

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Edwards-Jones O. Howells (2001) ArticleTitleThe origin and hazard of inputs to crop protection in organic farming systems: are they sustainable Agricultural Systems 67 IssueID1 31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fairweather (1999) ArticleTitle“Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications” Agriculture and Human Values 16 IssueID1 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Falconer (2000) ArticleTitle“Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: A transactional perspective” Journal of Rural Studies 16 379–394

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Franzel (1984) ArticleTitle“Modeling farmers’ decisions in a farming systems research exercise: The adoption of an improved maize variety in Kirinyaga District, Kenya” Human Organization 43 IssueID3 199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Franzel R. Coe P. Cooper F. Place S. J. Scherr (2001) ArticleTitle“Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in sub-Saharan Africa”. Agricultural Systems 69 IssueID(1-2) 37–62

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Freyer (1998) ArticleTitle“Umfrage zum umweltgerechten Landbau in den Kantonen BL und BS” (Survey on environmentally friendly agriculture in the cantons of BL and BS). Agrarforschung 5 IssueID7 329–332

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gladwin (1976) ArticleTitle“A view of the Plan Puebla: An application of hierarchical decision models” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 IssueID5 881–887

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gladwin (1989a) Ethnographic Decision-tree Modelling Sage Sage University Paper Series on Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 19. Beverly Hills, California

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gladwin (1989b) ArticleTitle“Indigenous knowledge systems, the cognitive revolution and agricultural decision-making” Agriculture and Human Values 6 IssueID3 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2000). Agrarian Dreams? The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

  • M. Häfliger J. Maurer (1996) ArticleTitle“Umstellung auf Biolandbau–Motivation und Hemmnisse”. (Conversion to organic farming–Motivations and obstacles). Agrarforschung 3 IssueID(11–12) 531–534

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hall V. Mogyorody (2001) ArticleTitle“Organic farmers in Ontario: An examination of the conventionalization argument”. Sociologia Ruralis 41 IssueID(4) 399–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenberg, K., R. Siebert, and H. Kächele (1999). “Determinanten für die Umstellungsbereitschaft landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter in Brandenburg auf Ökologischen Landbau.” [Determinants of the conversion-willingness of farm managers.] In H. Hoffmann and S. Müller (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau “Vom Rand zur Mitte” (pp. 333–336). February 23–25, 1999. Berlin, Germany: Verlag Dr. Köster.

  • K. Jansen (2000) ArticleTitle“Labour, livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe” Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 17 IssueID3 247–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltoft. P (1999) ArticleTitle“Values about nature in organic farming practice and knowledge” Sociologia Ruralis 39 IssueID1 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, Norton.

  • H. Kirchmann G. Thorvaldsson (2000) ArticleTitle“Challenging targets for future agriculture”. European Journal of Agronomy 12 IssueID(3–4) 145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirner, L. (2001). Die Umstellung auf biologischen Landbau in Österreich – Potential, Hemmnisse, Mehrkosten in der biologischen Milchproduktion. [Conversion to Organic Farming in Austria – Potentials, Obstacles and Additional Costs in Organic Dairying.] Schriftenreihe 92. Vienna, Austria: Bundesanstalt für Agrarwirtschaft.

  • L. Kirner W. Schneeberger (2000) ArticleTitle“Bereitschaft der Marktfruchtbetriebe zur Umstellung auf biologische Wirtschaftsweise in Österreich.Analyse einer schriftlichen Befragung”. [Willingness of cash crop farms to convert to organic farming in Austria. Analysis of a written survey.] Die Bodenkultur 51 IssueID2 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lockeretz (1997) ArticleTitle“Diversity of personal and enterprise characteristics among organic growers in the Northeastern United States” Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 14 IssueID1 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Lockeretz (1999) ArticleTitle“Farm profile: Sörtorp, an organic farm in Sweden” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14 IssueID1 37–41 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0889189300007992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Lohr L. Salomonsson (2000) ArticleTitle“Conversion subsidies for organic production: Results from Sweden and lessons for the United States”. Agricultural Economics 22 IssueID2 133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Long J. van der Ploeg (1994) “Heterogeneity, actor and structure: Towards a reconstitution of the concept of structure” D. Booth (Eds) Rethinking Social Development: Theory, Research and Practice Longman Harlow, Essex, UK 62–89

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Lund S. Hemlin W. Lockeretz (2002) ArticleTitle“Organic livestock production as viewed by Swedish farmers and organic initiators”. Agriculture and Human Values 19 IssueID3 255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McGregor J. Willock B. Dent I. Deary A. Sutherland G. Gibson O. Morgan B. Grieve (1996) ArticleTitle“Links between psychological factors and farmer decision-making”. Farm Management 9 IssueID5 228–239

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. McGregor M. F. Rola-Rubzen R. Murray-Prior (2001) ArticleTitle“Micro and macro-level approaches to modelling decision-making”. Agricultural Systems 69 IssueID(1–2) 63–83

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Michelsen (2001) ArticleTitle“Organic farming in a regulatory perspective The Danish case” Sociologia Ruralis 41 IssueID1 62–84

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Morgan J. Murdoch (2000) ArticleTitle“Organic vs.conventional agriculture: Knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain”. Geoforum 31 159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Morris C. Potter (1995) ArticleTitle“Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers’ adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the U.K”. Journal of Rural Studies 11 IssueID1 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Prior, R. (1994). “Farmers as scientists: A personal construct theory interpretation of hierarchical decision models.” Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, Victoria University, Wellington, February 7–11, 1994. (http://www.curtin. edu.au/curtin/muresk/publications).

  • R. Murray-Prior (1998) ArticleTitle“Modelling farmer behaviour: A personal construct theory interpretation of hierarchical decision models” Agricultural Systems 57 IssueID4 541–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Prior, R. and Wright, V. (1994). “Farmer decisions and aggregate supply: An explanation of the impact of major price changes.” Paper presented to the 38th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, Victoria University, Wellington, February 7–11, 1994. (http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/muresk/publications).

  • Noe, E. (1999). “Who are the organic farmers in Denmark of today?” Paper presented at the XVII Congress of the ESRS, August 24–28, 1999, Lund, Sweden.

  • P. L. Nuthall (2001) ArticleTitle“Managerial ability a review of its basis and potential improvement using psychological concepts” Agricultural Economics 24 247–262

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Padel (2001) ArticleTitleConversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41 IssueID(1) 40–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Padel, S. (2002). “Studying conversion as a human activity system”. In J. Powell (ed.), UK Organic Research 2002 (pp. 101–104). Proceedings of the Colloquium of Organic Researchers (COR) Conference, March 26–28, 2002, Aberystwyth, UK.

  • K. Pietola A. Lansink (2001) ArticleTitle“Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland”. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28 IssueID(1) 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Rämisch (2001) ArticleTitle“Regionale Marktchancen für Produkte des ökologischen Landbaus - dargestellt am Fallbeispiel der Region um Scheyern”[Regional marketing opportunities for organic products–a case study in the region around Scheyern.] Berichte über Landwirtschaft 79 IssueID2 212–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Regouin, E. (2002). “To convert or not to convert to organic farming”. Paper presented at the OECD Workshop on Organic Agriculture, September 23–26, 2002, Washington, DC.

  • D. Rigby D. Cáceres (2001) ArticleTitle“Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems”. Agricultural Systems 68 IssueID1 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Rigby R. Young M. Burton (2001) ArticleTitle“The development of and prospects for organic farming in the UK”. Food Policy 26 IssueID6 599–613

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Roep R. de Bruin (1994) “Regional marginalisation, styles of farming and technology development” J. van der Ploeg A. Long (Eds) Born from Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development Van Gorcum Assen, The Netherlands 217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Schoon R. Te Grotenhuis (2000) ArticleTitle“Values of farmers, sustainability and agricultural policy”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 IssueID1 17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Schneeberger L. Kirner (2001) ArticleTitle“Umstellung auf biologischen Landbau in Österreich”.[Conversion to organic farming in Austria.] Berichte über Landwirtschaft 79 IssueID(3) 348–360

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Schneeberger I. Darnhofer M. Eder (2002) ArticleTitle“Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash crop producers in Austria”. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17 IssueID(1) 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. (2001). Umstellung von Marktfruchtbetrieben im Marchfeld und Weinviertel auf die biologische Wirtschaftsweise - Umstellungshemmnisse, Umstellungsprobleme und Wirtschaftlichkeit. [Conversion to organic farming of cash crop farms in the Marchfeld and Weinviertel–Expected obstacles, encountered problems and economic considerations.] PhD Dissertation. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

  • L. Schulze Pals (1994) Ökonomische Analyse der Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau.[Economic Analysis of the Conversion to Organic Farming.] Reihe A, Heft 436, Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten. Landwirtschaftsverlag Münster, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D. (2001). “Different pebbles, same pond: ‘Farming styles’ in the Loddon catchment of Victoria.” Paper presented at “Exploring beyond the boundaries of extension.” Australasia-Pacific Extension Network, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, October 3–5, 2001 (http://www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2001/p).

  • H. Tovey (1997) ArticleTitle“Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: On the organic farming movement in Ireland” Sociologia Ruralis 37 IssueID(1) 21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Trewavas (2001) ArticleTitle“Urban myths of organic farming Organic farming began as an ideology, but can it meet today’s needs?” Nature 410 409–410

    Google Scholar 

  • J. van der Ploeg (1994) “Styles of farming: An introductory note on concepts and methodology” J. van der Ploeg A. Long (Eds) Born from Within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development Van Gorcum Assen, The Netherlands 217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • J. van der Ploeg (2000) ArticleTitle“Revitalizing agriculture: Farming economically as starting ground for rural development” Sociologia Ruralis 40 IssueID(4) 497–511

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ploeg Particlevan der H. Renting H. Brunori K. Knickel J. Mannion T. Marsden K. Roest Particlede E. Devilla-Guzmán F. Ventura (2000) ArticleTitle“Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory”. Sociologia Ruralis 40 IssueID(4) 391–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. (1995). “Die Umstellung auf Biologischen Landbau – Bäuerinnen und Bauern bewerten ihre Ziele und Erfahrungen im Umstellungsprozeß.” [Conversion to organic farming – farmers assess their goals and experiences during the conversion process.] In B. Freyer, B. Lehmann, W. Schneeberger, and U. Zerger (eds.), Betriebswirtschaft im biologischen Landbau (pp. 199–203). Proceedings of a conference held in Zurich, April 3–5, 1995. SÖL Sonderausgabe 57, Bad Dürkheim, Germany: SÖL.

  • N. Ward (1993) ArticleTitle“The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era” Sociologia Ruralis 33 IssueID(3/4) 348–364 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-9523.1993.tb00969.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Willock I. Deary G. Edwards-Jones G. Gibson M. McGregor A. Sutherland J. B. Dent O. Morgan R. Grieve (1999) ArticleTitle“The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision-making: Business and environmentally-oriented behaviour in Scotland”. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 IssueID(2) 286–303

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Wilson (1997) ArticleTitle“Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme” Journal of Environmental Management 50 IssueID(1) 67–93

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A. Wilson K. Hart (2001) ArticleTitleFarmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: Towards conservation-oriented thinking? Sociologia Ruralis 41 IssueID(2) 254–274 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9523.00181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Economics, Feistmantelstr. 4, Vienna, Austria, 1180

    Ika Darnhofer & Walter Schneeberger

  2. Institute for Organic Farming, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

    Bernhard Freyer

Authors
  1. Ika Darnhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Walter Schneeberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernhard Freyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ika Darnhofer.

Additional information

Ika Darnhofer is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Economics at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna. She received both her MSc and PhD in Agricultural Economics from the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, working on issues of agricultural development in Africa. Her current research interests include economic and sociological analyses of factors that shape farmers’ land use decision-making behavior, with a particular focus on organic farming.

Walter Schneeberger is a Full Professor of Farm Business Management and Head of the Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Economics at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna. His current research interests include the economics of producing and processing agricultural products and farm business management for both conventional and organic farms.

Bernhard Freyer is a Full Professor of Organic Farming and Head of the Institute of Organic Farming of the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna. His work on organic farming focuses on its agronomic aspects (plant cultivation, crop rotations, and soil fertility) as well as on the analysis of conversion to organic farming (planning process, farm development) and its potential for regional development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W. & Freyer, B. Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale. Agric Hum Values 22, 39–52 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-7229-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-7229-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation