Skip to main content
Log in

What drives students’ self-directed learning in a hybrid PBL curriculum

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence supporting Problem-based learning (PBL) fostering students’ self-directed learning (SDL) in hybrid PBL curricula is inconsistent. To explore the influence of PBL in a hybrid curriculum on students’ SDL, the authors investigated the following: (1) students’ self-assessed SDL ability, (2) students’ perceptions of the influence of curricular components on SDL, and (3) the relationships between curricular elements and SDL. The research questions were explored both quantitatively and qualitatively. All year 1 (n = 93) and year 2 (n = 93) students in 2004 were invited to participate. Participants completed a 53-item questionnaire addressing (a) self-assessment of their SDL ability, and (b) perceived influence of individual curriculum elements on individual study and SDL. Student and faculty focus group interviews (FGIs) were conducted. Students rated their SDL skills highly, particularly identifying knowledge deficits, learning skills and strategies, and managing study time. Students thought lectures helped in selecting study topics and learning for the tutorial case. Other components including tutors, unit/case objectives, tests, and tutorial discussions, were seen as influencing what to study and the learning process. No significant difference was observed in the responses between year 1 and 2 students. Among the six curriculum components, tutorial discussion and objectives were weakly correlated with with SDL ability. Findings from students and faculty focus group supported the perceived positive influence of the curriculum on SDL. This study found that students’ perceived SDL ability was positively influenced by several components of the hybrid PBL curriculum. However, further investigations are needed for a clearer understanding of the specific effects of the hybrid PBL curriculum on students’ SDL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In E. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning; a research perspectives on learning interactions (pp. 199–226). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, P., & Michael, J. A. (1992). Development of self-directed learning behaviors in a partially teacher-directed problem-based learning curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 4, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifeling learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, and quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distlehorst, L. H., Dawson, E., Robbs, R. S., & Barrows, H. S. (2005). Problem-based learning outcomes: The glass half-full. Academic Medicine, 80, 294–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, D. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (1994). What drives the student in problem-based learning? Medical Education, 28, 372–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B. J., Rothman, A. I., & Frecker, R. C. (2003). Effect of an undergraduate medical curriculum on students’ self-directed learning. Academic Medicine, 78, 1259–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. M., & Mann, K. V. (1996). Comparing students’ attitudes in problem-based and conventional curricula. Academic Medicine, 71, 1096–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning; a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, G. C., Khoo, H. E., Wong, M. L., & Koh, D. (2008). The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: A systematic review. CMAJ, 178, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Jones, G., & Hak, T. (2004). Self-directed learning and student pragmatism. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory and Practice, 9, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycke, K. H., Grottum, P., & Stromso, H. I. (2006). Student learning strategies, mental models and learning outcomes in problem-based and traditional curricula in medicine. Medical Teacher, 28, 717–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K. V. & Kaufman, D. M. (1994). Skills and attitudes in self-directed learning; the impact of a problem-based learning. The sixth Ottwawa Conference on Medical Education, 607–609.

  • Mann, K. V., & Kaufman, D. M. (1995). A response to the ACME-TRI report: The Dalhousie problem-based learning curriculum. Medical Education, 29, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K. V., & Kaufman, D. M. (1999). A comparative study of problem-based and conventional undergraduate curricula in preparing students for graduate medical education. Academic Medicine, 74, S4–S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mast, T. J., & Davis, D. (1994). Concepts of competence. In T. J. Mast & D. Davis (Eds.), The physician as learner (pp. 139–156). Chicago: Amercian Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miflin, B. M., Campbell, C. B., & Price, D. A. (1999). A lesson from the introduction of a problem-based, graduate entry course: The effects of different views of self-direction. Medical Education, 33, 801–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67, 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. (1993). Student perceptions about self-directed learning in a professional course implementing problem-based learning. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Vermeulen, L., & van der Molen, H. T. (2006). Longterm effects of problem-based learning: A comparison of competencies acquired by graduates of a problem-based and a conventional medical school. Medical Education, 40, 562–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkel, H. J., & Dolmans, D. H. (2006). The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 40, 730–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the medical students who participated in the survey, specially the students and the faculty members who volunteered for the focus group interviews; Soohyun Jeon, Ph.D., Korea University College of Medicine, for her contribution on statistical data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Mee Lee.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 5.

Table 5 Items and reliability coefficients for the elements of the COPS curriculum perceived by students to influence their individual study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, YM., Mann, K.V. & Frank, B.W. What drives students’ self-directed learning in a hybrid PBL curriculum. Adv in Health Sci Educ 15, 425–437 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9210-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9210-2

Keywords

Navigation