Skip to main content
Log in

A negotiation framework for linked combinatorial optimization problems

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tackle the challenge of applying automated negotiation to self-interested agents with local but linked combinatorial optimization problems. Using a distributed production scheduling problem, we propose two negotiation strategies for making concessions in a joint search space of agreements. In the first strategy, building on Lai and Sycara (Group Decis Negot 18(2):169–187, 2009), an agent concedes on local utility in order to achieve an agreement. In the second strategy, an agent concedes on the distance in an attribute space while maximizing its local utility. Lastly, we introduce a Pareto improvement phase to bring the final agreement closer to the Pareto frontier. Experimental results show that the new attribute-space negotiation strategy outperforms its utility-based counterpart on the quality of the agreements and the Pareto improvement phase is effective in approaching the Pareto frontier. This article presents the first study of applying automated negotiation to self-interested agents each with a local, but linked, combinatorial optimization problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An, B., Lesser, V., & Sim, K. M. (2008). Decommitment in multi-resource negotiation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Estoril, Portugal (pp. 1553–1556). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

  2. Bertsimas D., Thiele A. (2006) A robust optimization approach to inventorytheory. Operations Research 54(1): 150–168

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brahimi N., Dauzere-Peres S., Najid M. N., Nordli A. (2006) Single item lot sizing problems. European Journal of Operational Research 168(1): 1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, D. A., Brown, K. N., Dogru, M., & Lowe, B. (2007). Supply chain coordination through distributed constraint optimisation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, Providence, RI. Available from http://sites.google.com/site/ekrubdivad/burke-DCR07.pdf.

  5. Cachon P. G. (2008) Matching supply with demand: An introduction to operations management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crawford, E., & Veloso, M. (2008). Negotiation in semi-cooperative agreement problems. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, Sydney, Australia (pp. 252–258). IEEE.

  7. Duan, L., Doğru, M. K., & Özen, U., & Beck, J. C. (2010). Multi-agent negotiation for distributed production scheduling problems. In Proceedings of The Third International Workshop on Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations, Toronto, ON, Canada. Available from http://tidel.mie.utoronto.ca/pubs/cr_acno2010.pdf.

  8. Faratin P., Sierra C., Jenning N. R. (1998) Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24: 159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Faratin P., Sierra C., Jennings N. R. (2002) Using similarity criteria to make trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2): 205–237

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleischmann, B., & Meyr, H. (2003). Supply chain management: Design, coordination and operation. In Planning hierarchy, modeling and advanced planning systems, Chap. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  11. Grubshtein, A., Zivan, R., Grinshpoun, T., & Meisels, A. (2010). Local search for distributed asymmetric optimization. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada (pp. 1015–1022). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

  12. Kraus S. (2001) Strategic negotiation in multiagent environments. MIT, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai G., Sycara K. (2009) A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation 18(2): 169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M. D., Green J. R. (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Modi P. J., Shen W.-M., Tambe M., Yokoo M. (2005) ADOPT: Asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees. Artificial Intelligence 161: 149–180

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubinstein A. (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97–110

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Silver E. A., Pyke D. F., Peterson R. (1998) Inventory management and production planning and scheduling. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, S. F., Gallagher, A., Zimmerman, T., Barbulescu, L., & Rubinstein, Z. (2007). Distributed management of flexible times schedules. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Honolulu, HI (pp. 472–479). New York: ACM.

  19. Wooldridge M. (2009) An introduction to multiagent systems, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, X., & Lesser, V. (2002). Multi-linked negotiation in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy (pp. 1207–1214). New York: ACM.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Duan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duan, L., Doğru, M.K., Özen, U. et al. A negotiation framework for linked combinatorial optimization problems. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 25, 158–182 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-011-9172-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-011-9172-7

Keywords

Navigation