Abstract
Although there’s increasing emphasis on farmer-led extension in rural development, very few studies have been done to understand the social processes involved. This study was undertaken to identify farm and farmer characteristics that may influence dissemination of seed and knowledge of improved fallows and biomass transfer, to whom, how and what is disseminated. This was done by carrying out a formal and informal survey involving a random sample of 120 farmers from Siaya and Vihiga districts of western Kenya who were involved in a pilot project on soil fertility replenishment by the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) and Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI). A second survey involved 40 farmers, selected using the snowball sampling technique that were given seed and information by the first group of farmers. Descriptive statistics and logit regression models were used to analyze data. Results presented showed that seed and knowledge were mostly shared along kinship ties. Furthermore, informal social networks were found to be more effective for seed than knowledge. This calls for simplification of technical information by development professionals in order to help support farmers’ understanding and communication of complex principles. Farmers with leadership status in their groups, those who belonged to many groups and those with larger farm sizes were more likely to give out seed of improved fallows. These categories of farmers could be targeted to enhance the spread of technologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benor D, Harrison JQ (1977) Agricultural extension: the training and visit system. The World Bank, Washington DC
Bently JW, Boa E, van Mele P, Almanza J, Vasquez D, Eguino S (2003) Going public: a new extension method. Int J Agric Sustainability 1:108–123
Berg S (1988) Snowball sampling. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopaedia of Statistical Sciences, vol. 8. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 528–532
Davies K, Franzel S, Hilderbrand P, Place N (2004) Extending technologies among small scale farmers in Meru: ingredients for success in farmer groups. Paper presented at the Conference of the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education, Dublin, May 23–29, 2004
de Haan N (2001) Of goats and groups: a study on social capital in development projects. Agric Human Values 18:71–84
Douthwaite B, Delve R, Ekboir J, Twomlow S (2003) Contending with complexity: the role of evaluation in implementing sustainable natural resource management. Int J Agric Sustainability 1:51–66
Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Develop Cult Change 33:255–298
Franzel S (1999) Socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree fallows in Africa. Agrofor Syst 47:305–321
Franzel S, Cooper P, Denning G (2001) Scaling up the benefits of agroforestry research: lessons learned and research challenges. Dev Pract 11:524–534
Garforth C, Lawrence A (1997) Supporting sustainable agriculture through extension in Asia. ODI Natural Resources Perspectives, No. 21
International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR). (2000). Going to scale: can we bring more benefits to more people more quickly? IIRR, Silang, Cavite, Phillipines
Jama B, Palm CA, Buresh RJ, Niang A, Gachengo C, Nziguheba G, Amadalo B (2000) Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in western Kenya: a review. Agrofor Syst 49:201–221
Joshi L, Shrestha PK, Moss C, Sinclair FL (2004) Locally derived knowledge of soil fertility and its emerging role in integrated natural resource management. In: van Noodwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong C (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecoecosystems: concepts and models with multiple plant components. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 17–39
Keil A, Zeller M, Franzel S (2005) Improved tree fallows in smallholder maize production in Zambia: do initial testers adopt the technology? Agrofor Syst 64:225–236
Kwesiga F, Coe R (1994) The effect of short rotation Sesbania sesban planted fallows on maize yield. Forest Ecol Manage 64:199–208
Kwesiga F, Franzel S, Place F, Phiri D, Simwanza CP (1999) Sesbania sesban improved fallows in eastern Zambia: their inception, development and farmers enthusiasm. Agrofor Syst 47:49–66
Leewis C, van den Ban A (2004) Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Mango NAR (2002) Husbanding the land: agricultural development and socio-technical change in Luoland, Kenya. Published PhD Thesis, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Netherlands
Mango NAR, Hebinck P (2004) Cultural repertoires and socio-technological regimes: maize in Luoland. In: Wiskerke JC, Ploag JD (eds) Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production niches and regimes in Africa. Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 285–319
Mudege NN (2005) An ethnography of knowledge. Knowledge production and dissemination in land resettlement areas in Zimbambwe: the case of Mupfurudzi. Published PhD Thesis, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Netherlands
Nathaniels NQR (2005) Cowpea, farmer field schools and farmer to farmer extension: a Benin case study. Agricultural Research & Extension Network Paper No. 148
Niang A, De Wolf J, Nyasimi M, Hansen T, Rommelse R, Mwendwa K (1998) Soil fertility recapitalization and replenishment project in western Kenya. Pilot Project Report No. 9. Regional Agroforestry Research Centre, Maseno, Kenya
Noordin Q, Niang A, Jama B, Nyasimi M (2001) Scaling up adoption and impact of agroforestry technologies: experiences from western Kenya. Dev Pract 11:509–523
Noordin Q, Place F, Franzel S, De Wolf J (2003) Partcipatory research on agroforestry in western Kenya. In: Van Mele P (ed) Way out of the Woods: learning how to manage trees and forests. CPL Press, Newbury, UK, pp 53–67
Onim JFM, Otieno K, Dzowela B (1990) The role of Sesbania as a multi-purpose tree in small-scale farms in western Kenya. In: Macklin B, Evans DO (eds) Perennial Sesbania species in agroforestry systems. Proceedings of a workshop held in Nairobi, March 27–31, 1989. The Nitrogen Tree Association, Hawai, USA, pp 167–179
Phiri D, Franzel S, Mafongoya PL, Jere I, Katanga R, Phiri S (2004) Who is using the new technology? The association of wealth status and gender with the planting of improved tree fallows in Eastern Province, Zambia. Agric Syst 79:131–144
Place F, Adato M, Hebink P, Lwayo M, Omosa M, Nyasimi M, O’Leary C, Ongadi W, Ontita E, Opiyo P (2003) The impact of agroforestry based soil fertility replenishment practices on the poor in western Kenya. Final Report of the standing panel on impact assessment (SPIA)/IFPFRI Project on the Impact of Agricultural Research on Poverty. ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya
Pretty JN (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev 23:1247–1263
Shepherd KD, Ohlsson E, Okalebo JR, Ndufa JK (1996) Potential impact of agroforestry on soil nutrient balances at the farm scale in East African Highlands. Fertilizer Res 44:87–99
Simpson BM, Owens M (2002) Farmer field schools and the future of agricultural extension in Africa: sustainable development dimensions. FAO, Sustainable Development Department, Rome www.fao.org/sd/2002/KN0702 en.htm
Sinja J, Karigia J, Waithaka M, Miano D, Baltenwick I, Franzel S, Nyikal R, Romney D (2004) Adoption of fodder legumes technology through farmer to farmer extension approach. Uganda J Agric Sci 9:222–226
Smalling EMA (1993) Soil nutrient depletion in Sub-saharan Africa. In: van Rueler H, Prins WH (eds) The role of plant nutrients and sustainable food production in Sub-saharan Africa. Plonsen and Looijen, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 53–67
Spreen M (1992) Rare populations, hidden populations and link-tracing designs: what and why? Bull Methodol Sociol 36:34–5
Tiwari TP, Brook RM, Sinclair FL (2004) Implications of hill farmers’agronomic practices in Nepal for crop improvement in maize. Exp Agric 40:397–417
Van Duuren B (2003) Report of the consultancy on the assessment of the impact of the IPM programme at field level, 13 Jan–21 May 2003. Integrated pest management farmer training project, Danida, DAALI, Royal Government of Cambodia
Van Mele P, Zakaria AKM, Nasrin R, Chakroborty B, Hague MM, Rogers J (2005) Bringing science to life. Video development for women to women extension. In: Van Mele P, Salahuddin A, Magor NP (eds) Innovations in rural extension: case studies from Bangladesh. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 49–60
Vander Mey BJ (1999) Establishing gender sensitive IPM: a cowpea program in Ghana. In: van de Flirt E, Proost J (eds) Women and IPM: crop Protection Practices and strategies. Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 39–50
Vogt WP (1999) Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a non-technical guide for the social sciences. Sage publications, London UK
Walker DH, Sinclair FL, Thapa B (1995) Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development. Review of methods and their application. Agrofor Syst 30:235–248
Walker DH, Sinclair FL, Joshi L, Ambrose B (1997) Prospects for the use of corporate knowledge bases in the generation, management and communication of knowledge at a frontline agricultural research centre. Agric Syst 54:291–312
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Rockefeller Foundation and the Kenya Forestry Research Institute for providing financial support to undertake this work. Special thanks also go to the Participatory Approaches and Up-scaling Program of Wageningen University and Research Centre for supporting the first author undertake this study as part of her PhD thesis research. The authors are also grateful to Dr. James Kamiri Ndufa for providing logistical support in western Kenya and George Muok for his assistance in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kiptot, E., Franzel, S., Hebinck, P. et al. Sharing seed and knowledge: farmer to farmer dissemination of agroforestry technologies in western Kenya. Agroforest Syst 68, 167–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-006-9007-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-006-9007-8