Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training Level, Acculturation, Role Ambiguity, and Multicultural Discussions in Training and Supervising International Counseling Students in the United States

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research partially replicated Nilsson and Anderson’s Professional Psychology: Research and Practice (2004) study on training and supervising international students. It investigated the relationships among international counseling students’ training level, acculturation, supervisory working alliance (SWA), counseling self-efficacy (COSE), role ambiguity (RA) and multicultural discussion (MD) in supervision. In the present study (N = 71), two acculturation variables and RA predicted SWA. SWA and MD did not predict COSE, while language use in acculturation did. Training level differences were only associated with COSE. Findings indicate that supervisors should attend to role ambiguity and multicultural issues when supervising international students, including acculturation issues and their impact on students’ performance. Results are discussed against Nilsson and Anderson’s original study and the implications for supervision of international counseling students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D. E. (1990). The relationship of the supervisory working alliance to supervisor and supervisee narcissism, gender, and theoretical orientation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(7-B), 3602–3603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1962). Dimensions of therapist response as causal factors in the therapeutic change. Psychological Monographs, 76(42, Whole No. 562).

  • Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychodynamic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. doi:10.1177/0011000083111007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. P. (1999). Common stressors among international college students: research and counseling implications. Journal of College Counseling, 2, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, T. W., Henderson, D. A., Schweiger, W. K., & Collins, D. R. (2004). Counselor preparation: Programs, faculty, trends (11th ed.). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). Statistics a power primer. Psychology Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, J. A., & Larson, L. M. (2001). The impact of performance feedback on counseling self-efficacy and counselor anxiety. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322–329. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatmon, D., Jackson, D., Koshkarian, L., Martos-Perry, N., Molina, A., Patel, N., et al. (2001). Exploring ethnic, gender, and sexual orientation variables in supervision: do they really matter? Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29, 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killian, K. D. (2001). Differences making a difference: cross-cultural interactions in supervisor relationships. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 12, 61–103. doi:10.1300/J086v12n02_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacrosse, M. B., & Barak, A. (1976). Differential perception of counselor behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 170–172. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.23.2.170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, N., & Friedlander, M. L. (1995). The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. M., & Daniels, J. A. (1998). Review of the counseling self-efficacy literature. Counseling Psychologist, 26, 179–218. doi:10.1177/0011000098262001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. M., Suzuki, L. A., Gillespie, K. N., Potenza, M. T., Bechtel, M. A., & Toulouse, A. L. (1992). Development and validation of the Counseling Self-Estimate Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 105–120. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.39.1.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, M., & Wieling, E. (2006). Training experiences of international doctoral students in marriage and family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 369–383. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01613.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Y., Inman, A. G., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2009). Supervising international students: relationship between acculturation, supervisor multicultural competence, cultural discussions, and supervision satisfaction. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 10–18. doi:10.1037/a0013072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K.-M. (2006a). Counselor educators’ perceptions of and experiences with international counseling students: an online exploratory study. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10447-005-8492-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K.-M. (2006b). International students in CACREP-accredited counseling programs. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory, and Research, 34, 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K.-M., & Smith, S. D. (2009). Perception and experiences of international trainees in counseling and related programs. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 31, 57–70. doi:10.1007/s10447-008-9068-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, J. E. (2007). International students in supervision: course self-efficacy, stress, and cultural discussions in supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 26, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, J. E., & Anderson, M. Z. (2004). Supervising international students: the role of acculturation, role ambiguity, and multicultural discussions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 306–312. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.3.306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, J. E., & Dodds, A. K. (2006). A pilot phase in the development of the International Student Supervision Scale. Journal of Multicultural Counseling & Development, 34, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olk, M. E., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees’ experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 389–397. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.39.3.389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, S. (2003). Cultural diversity: mapping the experiences of students on an international counselor training programme. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 3, 107–113. doi:10.1080/14733140312331384472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangganjanavanich, V. F., & Black, L. L. (2009). Clinical supervision for international counselors-in-training: implications for supervisors. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory & Research, 37, 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, W. D. (2001). Replication: a design principle for field research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(15). Retrieved October 19, 2010 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=15.

  • Smith, S. D., & Ng, K.-M. (2009). International counseling trainees’ experiences and perceptions of their multicultural counseling training in the United States: a mixed method inquiry. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 31, 271–285. doi:10.1007/s10447-009-9083-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodowsky, G. R., Lai, E. W., & Plake, B. S. (1991). Psychometric properties of the American-International Relations Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 207–216. doi:10.1177/0013164491511020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: the counselor-complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychologists, 28, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (1998). Psychotherapy supervision in the 21st century: some pressing needs and impressing possibilities. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 93–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was partially funded by the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision Research Grant Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Counseling, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

    Kok-Mun Ng

  2. Department of Counselor Education, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Shannon D. Smith

Authors
  1. Kok-Mun Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shannon D. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok-Mun Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, KM., Smith, S.D. Training Level, Acculturation, Role Ambiguity, and Multicultural Discussions in Training and Supervising International Counseling Students in the United States. Int J Adv Counselling 34, 72–86 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-011-9130-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-011-9130-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation