Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Modeling of Stents Deployed in Tapered Arteries

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biomechanical interaction of stents and the arteries into which they are deployed is a potentially important consideration for long-term success. Adverse arterial reactions to excessive stress and the resulting damage have been linked to the development of restenosis. Complex geometric features often encountered in these procedures can confound treatment. In some cases, it is desirable to deploy a stent across a region in which the diameter decreases significantly over the length of the stent. This study aimed to assess the final arterial diameter and circumferential stress in tapered arteries into which two different stents were deployed (one stiff and one less stiff). The artery wall was assumed to be made of a strain stiffening material subjected to large deformations, with a 10% decrease in diameter over the length of the stent. A commercially available finite element code was employed to solve the contact problem between the two elastic bodies. The stiffer stent dominated over arterial taper, resulting in a nearly constant final diameter along the length of the stent, and very high stresses, particularly at the distal end. The less stiff stent followed more closely the tapered contour of the artery, resulting in lower artery wall stresses. More compliant stents should be considered for tapered artery applications, perhaps even to the exclusion of tapered stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bedoya J., Stent Design and Arterial Mechanics: Parameterization Tools Using the Finite Element Method, 2005. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University: College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bedoya J., et al., Effects of stent design parameters on normal artery wall mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 128(5):757–765, 2006. doi:10.1115/1.2246236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry J.L., et al., Hemodynamics and wall mechanics of a compliance matching stent: in vitro and in vivo analysis. J. Vasc. Inter. Radiol. 13(1):97–105, 2002. doi:10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60015-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosiers M., et al., Carotid artery stenting: which stent for which lesion? Vascular 13(4):205–210, 2005. doi:10.2310/6670.2005.50072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng C.P., et al., In vivo MR angiographic quantification of axial and twisting deformations of the superficial femoral artery resulting from maximum hip and knee flexion. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17(6):979–987, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding Z., M.H. Friedman, Quantification of 3-D coronary arterial motion using clinical biplane cineangiograms. Int. J. Card. Imaging. 16(5):331–346, 2000. doi:10.1023/A:1026590417177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Farb A., et al., Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 105(25):2974–2980, 2002. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000019071.72887.BD

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holzapfel G.A., M. Stadler, C.A. Schulze-Bauer, A layer-specific three-dimensional model for the simulation of balloon angioplasty using magnetic resonance imaging and mechanical testing. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30(6):753–767, 2002. doi:10.1114/1.1492812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Humphrey, J.D. Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs. New York: Springer verlag, 2002

  10. Humphrey J.D., et al., Computer-aided vascular experimentation: a new electromechanical test system. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21(1):33–43. 1993, doi:10.1007/BF02368162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Indolfi C., et al., Rat carotid artery dilation by PTCA balloon catheter induces neointima formation in presence of IEL rupture. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 283(2):H760–H767, 2002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kastrati A., et al., Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. Am. J. Cardiol. 87(1):34–39, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01268-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lally C., F. Dolan, P.J. Prendergast, Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis [erratum appears in J. Biomech. 2006;39(9):1760]. J. Biomech. 38(8):1574–1581, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Migliavacca F., et al., Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. J. Biomech. 35(6):803–811, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00033-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milnor W., Hemodynamics, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers C., et al., Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. Circ. Res. 84(4):378–383, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosamond W., et al., Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 115(5):e69–171, 2007. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.179918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Serruys P.W., N. Kukreja, Late stent thrombosis in drug-eluting stents: return of the ‘VB syndrome’. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med.. 3(12):637, 2006. doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Timmins L.H., et al., Stented artery biomechanics and device design optimization. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45(5):505–513, 2007. doi:10.1007/s11517-007-0180-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zubaid M., C. Buller, G.B. Mancini, Normal angiographic tapering of the coronary arteries. Can. J. Cardiol. 18(9):973–980, 2002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by NIH Grant No. R01 EB000115.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Moore Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timmins, L.H., Meyer, C.A., Moreno, M.R. et al. Mechanical Modeling of Stents Deployed in Tapered Arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 36, 2042–2050 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9582-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9582-0

Keywords

Navigation