Abstract
Purpose
To estimate the risk of blindness following bleb-related infection after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in open angle glaucoma, utilizing data obtained from two prospective multicenter studies.
Methods
The incidence of bleb-related infection in open angle glaucoma after the first or second glaucoma surgery was calculated using a Kaplan–Meier analysis and data from the Collaborative Bleb-related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study (CBIITS). The rate of blindness following bleb-related infection was calculated using data from the Japan Glaucoma Society Survey of Bleb-related Infection (JGSSBI). Finally, the rate of blindness following bleb-related infection after filtering surgery was estimated based on the above two data sets. Blindness was defined as an eye with a visual acuity of 0.04 or less.
Results
The incidences of development of bleb-related infection at 5 years were 2.6 ± 0.7 % (calculated cumulative incidence ± standard error) for all infections and 0.9 ± 0.4 % for endophthalmitis in all cases in the CBIITS data. The rates of blindness in the JGSSBI data were 14 % for the total cases with bleb-related infection and 30 % for the endophthalmitis subgroup. The rate of blindness developing within 5 years following trabeculectomy was estimated to be approximately 0.24–0.36 %.
Conclusions
The rate of blindness following bleb-related infection within 5 years after trabeculectomy is considerable and thus careful consideration must be given to the indication for trabeculectomy and the selection of surgical techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kitazawa Y, Kawase K, Matsushita H, Minobe M. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin. A comparative study with fluorouracil. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1693–8.
Awai-Kasaoka N, Inoue T, Inatani M, Takihara Y, Ogata-Iwao M, Tanihara H. Prognostic factors in trabeculectomy with mitomycin C having history of previous glaucoma surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57:514–9.
Solus JF, Jampel HD, Tracey PA, Gilbert DL, Loyd TL, Jeffers JL, et al. Comparison of limbus-based and fornix-based trabeculectomy: success, bleb-related complications, and bleb morphology. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:703–11.
Jampel HD, Solus JF, Tracey PA, Gilbert DL, Loyd TL, Jeffers JL, et al. Outcomes and bleb-related complications of trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:712–22.
Song A, Scott IU, Flynn HW, Budenz DL. Delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis: clinical features and visual acuity outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:985–91.
Kangas TA, Greenfield DS, Flynn HW, Parrish RK, Palmberg P. Delayed-onset endophthalmitis associated with conjunctival filtering blebs. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:746–52.
Ciulla TA, Beck AD, Topping TM, Baker AS. Blebitis, early endophthalmitis and late endophthalmitis after glaucoma-filtering surgery. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:986–95.
Mandelbaum S, Forster RK, Gelender H, Culbertson W. Late onset endophthalmitis associated with filtering blebs. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:964–72.
Higginbotham EJ, Stevens RK, Musch DC, Karp KO, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, et al. Bleb-related endophthalmitis after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:650–6.
Leng T, Miller D, Flynn HW Jr, Jacobs DJ, Gedde SJ. Delayed-onset bleb-associated endophthalmitis (1996–2008): causative organisms and visual acuity outcomes. Retina. 2011;31:344–52.
Yamamoto T, Kuwayama Y, The Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative bleb-related infection incidence and treatment study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:453–8.
Yamamoto T, Sawada A, Mayama C, Araie M, Ohkubo S, Sugiyama K, The Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study Group, et al. The 5-year incidence of bleb-related infection and its risk factors following filtering surgeries with adjunctive mitomycin C. Collaborative bleb-related infection incidence and treatment study 2. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1001–6.
Yamamoto T, Kuwayama Y, Kano K, Sawada A, Shoji N, Study Group for the Japan Glaucoma Society Survey of Bleb-related Infection. Clinical features of bleb-related infection: a 5-year survey in Japan. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:619–24.
Yamamoto T, Kuwayama Y, Nomura E, Tanihara H, Mori K, Study Group for the Japan Glaucoma Society Survey of Bleb-related Infection. Changes in visual acuity and intraocular pressure following bleb-related infection: the Japan Glaucoma Society Survey of Bleb-related Infection Report 2 [report online]. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:e420–6.
Azuara-Branco A, Katz LJ. Dysfunctional filtering blebs. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;43:93–126.
Greenfield DS. Bleb-related ocular infection. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:132–6.
Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844–51.
Inoue T, Inatani M, Takihara Y, Awai-Kasaoka N, Ogata-Iwao M, Tanihara H. Prognostic risk factors for failure of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C after vitrectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:464–9.
Aoyama A, Ishida K, Sawada A, Yamamoto T. Target intraocular pressure for stability of visual field loss progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54:117–23.
Malihi M, Filho ERM, Hodge DO, Sit AJ. Long-term trends in glaucoma-related blindness in Olmsted County, Minnesota [online report]. Ophthalmology. 2013;121(1):134–41.
Peters D, Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Lifetime risk of blindness in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:724–30.
Our A, Kano K, Kuwayama Y. Risk factors for visual outcome after bleb-related infection. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2010;114:598–603 (in Japanese).
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their deep appreciation to the Japan Glaucoma Society for the opportunity to perform this research.
Conflicts of interest
H. Yamada, None; A. Sawada, None; Y. Kuwayama, None; T. Yamamoto, None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, H., Sawada, A., Kuwayama, Y. et al. Blindness following bleb-related infection in open angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 58, 490–495 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0346-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-014-0346-0