Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity growth in case of emerging market economies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Economics and Economic Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of exchange rate misalignment on total factor productivity growth in case of 15 emerging market economies using the annual data from 1990 to 2014. First, this study through panel cointegration test found a long-run cointegrating relationship between RER misalignment and TFP growth. Second, the DOLS results indicated that RER misalignment has negatively affected the TFP growth in the majority of the countries within the EMEs and the group as a whole too. Third, we found bi-directional panel long-run and short-run Granger causality between real exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity growth. Finally, in order to check the robustness, the dynamic panel data results showed that RER misalignment has negatively affected the TFP growth, which is consistent with our results derived from the DOLS. Further, when we decomposed the series into pre and post global financial crisis periods, this study found that real exchange rate misalignment did not affect the TFP growth in the pre-global financial crisis, but it has significantly adverse impact on TFP growth after the global financial crisis periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We select these fifteen countries on the basis of availability of data for measuring exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, Thaicharoen Y (2003) Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises, and growth. J Monet Econ 50(1):49–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion P, Bachetta P, Rancière R, Rogo K (2006) Exchange rate volatility and productivity growth: the role of financial development. Swiss Finance Institute

  • Aguirre, A., & Calderon, C., A. (2005). Real exchange rate misalignments and economic performance. Central Bank of Chile, Santiago.

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa B (1964) The purchasing power parity doctrine: a reappraisal. J. Political Economy 72:584–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereau S, Lopez-Villavicencio A, Mignon V (2009) Currency misalignments and growth: A new looking using nonlinear panel data methods. CEPII, Working Paper No 2009–17, Paris

  • Bhalla SS (2007) Second among equals: the middle class kingdoms of India and China. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleany M, Greenaway D (2000) The impact of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Econ 65:491–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth BP, Collins SM, Chen Y (1996) Accounting for differences in economic growth. In: Kohsaka A, Ohno K (eds) Structural adjustment and economic reform: East Asia, Latin America, and central and Eastern Europe. Tokyo, Institute of Developing Economies

    Google Scholar 

  • Campa M (1993) Entry by foreign firms in the U.S. under exchange rate uncertainty. Rev Econ Stat 75:614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canning D, Pedroni P (2004) The effect of infrastructure on long-run economic growth. Harvard University, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo D, Cottani J, Khan MS (1990) Real exchange rate behavior and economic performance in LDCs. Econ Dev Cult Chang 39(1):61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang GH, Shao S (2004) How much is the Chinese currency undervalued? A quantitative estimation. China Econ Rev 15(3):366–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung YW, Chinn MD, Fujii E (2010) China’s current account and exchange rate. University of Chicago Press, ISBN: 0–226–23971-3

  • Couharde C, Sallenave A (2013) How do currency misalignments’ threshold affect economic growth? J Macroecon 36:106–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai PV, Delpachitra S (2015) Exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity in: an empirical analysis in East Asian economies. Economic Press, p 1–15

  • Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985. Econ Dev Cult Chang 40:523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domaç I, Shabsigh G (1999) Real exchange rate behavior and economic growth: Evidenc from Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Tunisia, International Monetary Fund. IMF, WP/99/40

  • Dornbusch R (1988) Overvaluation and trade balance. In: Dornbusch R, Helmers FL (eds) The open economy: tools for policymakers in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Washington D.C., pp 80–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubas JM (2009) The importance of the exchange rate regime in limiting misalignment. World Dev 37(10):1612–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Levine R (1996) Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions, Papers 536, Harvard - Institute for International Development

  • Easterly W, Levine R (2003) Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. J Monet Econ 50(1):3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Kremer M, Pritchett L, Summers LH (1993) Good policy or good luck? Country growth performance and temporary shocks. J Monet Econ 32(3):459–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen B (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth. Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 4. (Ed.)

  • Elbadawi I, Kaltani L, Soto R (2012) Aid, real exchange rate misalignment and economic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. Estimating equilibrium exchange rates. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, pp 93–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gala P (2008) Real exchange rate levels and economic development: theoretical analysis and econometric evidence. Camb J Econ 32(2):273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gala P, Lucinda CR (2006) Exchange rate misalignment and growth: old and new econometric evidence. Revista Economia 7(4):165–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin M, Hausmann R, Leiderman L (1995) The macroeconomics of capital flows to Latin America: recent experience and policy issues. OCE Working Paper, Inter-American Development Bank

  • Ghura D, Grennes T (1993) The real exchange rate and macroeconomic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Econ 42:155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Richard, G. & Samer Kherfi, (2000). Productivity growth, convergence, and trade specialization in Canadian manufacturing, forthcoming in J. Bernstein, R. G. Harris and A. Sharpe(eds.) The Canada-U.S. manufacturing productivity Gap and available at http://www.sfu.ca/~rharri

  • Hausmann R, Pritchett L, Rodrik D (2005) Growth accelerations. J Econ Growth 10(4):303–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justin D (2012) Exchange rate misalignment and economic growth. Southwestern Economic Review 39(1):121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Chiang MH (1999) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data (Center for Policy Research Working Papers No. 2). Syracuse University, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy JV, Whited TM (1995) The effect of uncertainty on investment: Some stylized facts. NBER Working Paper No. 4986

  • Levin A, Lin CF (1992) Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Discussion Paper No. 92–93, University of California at San Diego, San Diego

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CJ (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108 (revise version of 1992’s work), 1–24.

  • Matsuyama K (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 58(2):317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaye S (2012) Real exchange rate undervaluation and growth: is there a total factor productivity growth channel? CERDI, Clermont-Ferrand

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoskey S, Kao C (1998) A residual-based test for the null of cointegration in panel data. Econ Rev 17(1):57–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod D, Mileva E (2011) Real exchange rates and productivity growth. Fordham University Department of Economics Discussion Paper, vol 4, pp 1–27

  • Narayan PK, Sagarika M, Narayan S (2011) Do market capitalization and stocks traded converge? New global evidence. J Bank Financ 35:2771–2781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouira R, Sekkat K (2012) Desperately seeking the positive impact of undervaluation on growth. J Macroecon 34(2):537–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Economet Theor 20:597–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad ES, Rajan RG, Subramanian A (2007) Foreign capital and economic growth. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:153–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rath BN (2016) Does the digital divide across countries lead to convergence? New international evidence. Econ Model 58:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razmi A, Rapetti M, Skott P (2012) The real exchange rate and economic development. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 23(2):151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:365–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallenave, A (2010a) Real exchange rate misalignment and economic performance for the G20 countries. Working Paper, 92001NANTERRE CEDEX. http://economix.uparis10.fr/

  • Sallenave A (2010b) Real exchange rate misalignments and economic performance for the G20 countries. Int Econ 121:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1964) Theoretical notes on trade problems. Rev Econ Stat 46:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder M (2013) Should developing countries undervalue their currencies? J Dev Econ 105:140–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61(4):783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terra C, Valladares F (2010) Real exchange rate misalignments. Int Rev Econ Financ 19:119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulaboe A (2006) Real exchange rate misalignments and economic growth in developing countries. Southwestern Economic Review 33:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira FV, MacDonald R (2012) A panel data investigation of real exchange rate misalignment and growth. Estudos Economicos (Sao Paulo) 42(3):433–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (1990) What Washington means by policy reform. In: Williamson J (ed) Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong HT (2013) Real exchange rate misalignment and economic growth in Malaysia. J Econ Stud 40(3):298–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You K, Sarantis N (2012) Structural breaks and the equilibrium real effective exchange rate of China: a NATREX approach. China Econ Rev 23(4):1146–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Chen L (2014) A new assessment of the Chinese RMB exchange rate. China Econ Rev 30:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Sato K, Shimizu J, Shrestha N (2012) New estimates of the equilibrium exchange rate: the case for the chinese renminbi. World Econ 35(4):419–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the suggestions of the editor and two anonymous referees on an earlier draft of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badri Narayan Rath.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Measuring capital stock

The physical capital stock data are not readily available in case of emerging countries. Thus, following Easterly and Levine (2003), we use a Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) to compute capital stocks. Specifically, let K(t) is the real capital stock in period t. Let I(t) equal the real investment rate in period t. The real investment is defined as gross fixed capital formation at constant 2005 US$. Let d equal the depreciation rate, which we assume equals 0.07. Thus, the capital accumulation equations state as:

K(t) = (1-d) K(t-1) + I(t). To make an initial estimate of the capital stock, we make the assumption that the country is at its steady-state capital-output ratio. Thus, in terms of steady-state value, let k = K/Y, let g = the growth rate of real GDP, Y is the real GDP and let i = I/Y. Then, from the capital accumulation equation plus the assumption that the country is at its steady-state, we know that k = i/[g + d]. Thus, if we can obtain a reasonable estimate of the steady-state values of i, g and d, then we can compute a reasonable estimate of k. Then, using the calculated value of k, an initial estimate of capital stock (k) multiplied with initial GDP(Y) can be obtained. In order to work out the initial estimate of k, we assume the steady state capital output ratio (d) = 0.07. We construct the steady-state growth rate (g): a weighted averaged of the countries average growth rate during the first ten years of which we have output and investment data and the world growth rate. The world growth rate is computed as 0.0234. Based on Easterly et al. (1993), we give a weight of 0.75 to the world growth rate and 0.25 to the country growth rate in computing an estimate of the steady-state growth rate for each individual country. We then compute i as the average investment rate during the first ten years for which there are data. Thus, with values for d, g, and i for each country, we estimate k for each country. To reduce the influence of business cycles on estimates of Y, we use the average real GDP value between 1989 and 1991 as an estimate of initial output. Thus, the capital stock, for example, in 1990 is given as Y*k.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, V., Rath, B.N. Exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity growth in case of emerging market economies. Int Econ Econ Policy 15, 547–564 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0374-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0374-6

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation