Abstract
This paper examines the impact of exchange rate misalignment on total factor productivity growth in case of 15 emerging market economies using the annual data from 1990 to 2014. First, this study through panel cointegration test found a long-run cointegrating relationship between RER misalignment and TFP growth. Second, the DOLS results indicated that RER misalignment has negatively affected the TFP growth in the majority of the countries within the EMEs and the group as a whole too. Third, we found bi-directional panel long-run and short-run Granger causality between real exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity growth. Finally, in order to check the robustness, the dynamic panel data results showed that RER misalignment has negatively affected the TFP growth, which is consistent with our results derived from the DOLS. Further, when we decomposed the series into pre and post global financial crisis periods, this study found that real exchange rate misalignment did not affect the TFP growth in the pre-global financial crisis, but it has significantly adverse impact on TFP growth after the global financial crisis periods.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We select these fifteen countries on the basis of availability of data for measuring exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity.
References
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, Thaicharoen Y (2003) Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises, and growth. J Monet Econ 50(1):49–123
Aghion P, Bachetta P, Rancière R, Rogo K (2006) Exchange rate volatility and productivity growth: the role of financial development. Swiss Finance Institute
Aguirre, A., & Calderon, C., A. (2005). Real exchange rate misalignments and economic performance. Central Bank of Chile, Santiago.
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297
Balassa B (1964) The purchasing power parity doctrine: a reappraisal. J. Political Economy 72:584–596
Bereau S, Lopez-Villavicencio A, Mignon V (2009) Currency misalignments and growth: A new looking using nonlinear panel data methods. CEPII, Working Paper No 2009–17, Paris
Bhalla SS (2007) Second among equals: the middle class kingdoms of India and China. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington
Bleany M, Greenaway D (2000) The impact of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Econ 65:491–500
Bosworth BP, Collins SM, Chen Y (1996) Accounting for differences in economic growth. In: Kohsaka A, Ohno K (eds) Structural adjustment and economic reform: East Asia, Latin America, and central and Eastern Europe. Tokyo, Institute of Developing Economies
Campa M (1993) Entry by foreign firms in the U.S. under exchange rate uncertainty. Rev Econ Stat 75:614–622
Canning D, Pedroni P (2004) The effect of infrastructure on long-run economic growth. Harvard University, Mimeo
Cavallo D, Cottani J, Khan MS (1990) Real exchange rate behavior and economic performance in LDCs. Econ Dev Cult Chang 39(1):61–76
Chang GH, Shao S (2004) How much is the Chinese currency undervalued? A quantitative estimation. China Econ Rev 15(3):366–371
Cheung YW, Chinn MD, Fujii E (2010) China’s current account and exchange rate. University of Chicago Press, ISBN: 0–226–23971-3
Couharde C, Sallenave A (2013) How do currency misalignments’ threshold affect economic growth? J Macroecon 36:106–120
Dai PV, Delpachitra S (2015) Exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity in: an empirical analysis in East Asian economies. Economic Press, p 1–15
Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Dollar D (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985. Econ Dev Cult Chang 40:523–544
Domaç I, Shabsigh G (1999) Real exchange rate behavior and economic growth: Evidenc from Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Tunisia, International Monetary Fund. IMF, WP/99/40
Dornbusch R (1988) Overvaluation and trade balance. In: Dornbusch R, Helmers FL (eds) The open economy: tools for policymakers in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Washington D.C., pp 80–107
Dubas JM (2009) The importance of the exchange rate regime in limiting misalignment. World Dev 37(10):1612–1622
Easterly W, Levine R (1996) Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions, Papers 536, Harvard - Institute for International Development
Easterly W, Levine R (2003) Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. J Monet Econ 50(1):3–39
Easterly W, Kremer M, Pritchett L, Summers LH (1993) Good policy or good luck? Country growth performance and temporary shocks. J Monet Econ 32(3):459–483
Eichengreen B (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth. Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 4. (Ed.)
Elbadawi I, Kaltani L, Soto R (2012) Aid, real exchange rate misalignment and economic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. Estimating equilibrium exchange rates. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, pp 93–133
Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276
Gala P (2008) Real exchange rate levels and economic development: theoretical analysis and econometric evidence. Camb J Econ 32(2):273–288
Gala P, Lucinda CR (2006) Exchange rate misalignment and growth: old and new econometric evidence. Revista Economia 7(4):165–187
Gavin M, Hausmann R, Leiderman L (1995) The macroeconomics of capital flows to Latin America: recent experience and policy issues. OCE Working Paper, Inter-American Development Bank
Ghura D, Grennes T (1993) The real exchange rate and macroeconomic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. J Dev Econ 42:155–174
Harris, Richard, G. & Samer Kherfi, (2000). Productivity growth, convergence, and trade specialization in Canadian manufacturing, forthcoming in J. Bernstein, R. G. Harris and A. Sharpe(eds.) The Canada-U.S. manufacturing productivity Gap and available at http://www.sfu.ca/~rharri
Hausmann R, Pritchett L, Rodrik D (2005) Growth accelerations. J Econ Growth 10(4):303–329
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74
Justin D (2012) Exchange rate misalignment and economic growth. Southwestern Economic Review 39(1):121–137
Kao C, Chiang MH (1999) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data (Center for Policy Research Working Papers No. 2). Syracuse University, Syracuse
Leahy JV, Whited TM (1995) The effect of uncertainty on investment: Some stylized facts. NBER Working Paper No. 4986
Levin A, Lin CF (1992) Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Discussion Paper No. 92–93, University of California at San Diego, San Diego
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CJ (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108 (revise version of 1992’s work), 1–24.
Matsuyama K (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 58(2):317–334
Mbaye S (2012) Real exchange rate undervaluation and growth: is there a total factor productivity growth channel? CERDI, Clermont-Ferrand
McCoskey S, Kao C (1998) A residual-based test for the null of cointegration in panel data. Econ Rev 17(1):57–84
McLeod D, Mileva E (2011) Real exchange rates and productivity growth. Fordham University Department of Economics Discussion Paper, vol 4, pp 1–27
Narayan PK, Sagarika M, Narayan S (2011) Do market capitalization and stocks traded converge? New global evidence. J Bank Financ 35:2771–2781
Nouira R, Sekkat K (2012) Desperately seeking the positive impact of undervaluation on growth. J Macroecon 34(2):537–552
Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Economet Theor 20:597–627
Prasad ES, Rajan RG, Subramanian A (2007) Foreign capital and economic growth. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:153–230
Rath BN (2016) Does the digital divide across countries lead to convergence? New international evidence. Econ Model 58:75–82
Razmi A, Rapetti M, Skott P (2012) The real exchange rate and economic development. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 23(2):151–169
Rodrik D (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:365–412
Sallenave, A (2010a) Real exchange rate misalignment and economic performance for the G20 countries. Working Paper, 92001NANTERRE CEDEX. http://economix.uparis10.fr/
Sallenave A (2010b) Real exchange rate misalignments and economic performance for the G20 countries. Int Econ 121:59–80
Samuelson PA (1964) Theoretical notes on trade problems. Rev Econ Stat 46:145–154
Schroder M (2013) Should developing countries undervalue their currencies? J Dev Econ 105:140–151
Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–320
Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61(4):783–820
Terra C, Valladares F (2010) Real exchange rate misalignments. Int Rev Econ Financ 19:119–144
Toulaboe A (2006) Real exchange rate misalignments and economic growth in developing countries. Southwestern Economic Review 33:57–74
Vieira FV, MacDonald R (2012) A panel data investigation of real exchange rate misalignment and growth. Estudos Economicos (Sao Paulo) 42(3):433–456
Williamson J (1990) What Washington means by policy reform. In: Williamson J (ed) Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
Wong HT (2013) Real exchange rate misalignment and economic growth in Malaysia. J Econ Stud 40(3):298–313
You K, Sarantis N (2012) Structural breaks and the equilibrium real effective exchange rate of China: a NATREX approach. China Econ Rev 23(4):1146–1163
Zhang Z, Chen L (2014) A new assessment of the Chinese RMB exchange rate. China Econ Rev 30:113–122
Zhang Z, Sato K, Shimizu J, Shrestha N (2012) New estimates of the equilibrium exchange rate: the case for the chinese renminbi. World Econ 35(4):419–443
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the suggestions of the editor and two anonymous referees on an earlier draft of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Measuring capital stock
The physical capital stock data are not readily available in case of emerging countries. Thus, following Easterly and Levine (2003), we use a Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) to compute capital stocks. Specifically, let K(t) is the real capital stock in period t. Let I(t) equal the real investment rate in period t. The real investment is defined as gross fixed capital formation at constant 2005 US$. Let d equal the depreciation rate, which we assume equals 0.07. Thus, the capital accumulation equations state as:
K(t) = (1-d) K(t-1) + I(t). To make an initial estimate of the capital stock, we make the assumption that the country is at its steady-state capital-output ratio. Thus, in terms of steady-state value, let k = K/Y, let g = the growth rate of real GDP, Y is the real GDP and let i = I/Y. Then, from the capital accumulation equation plus the assumption that the country is at its steady-state, we know that k = i/[g + d]. Thus, if we can obtain a reasonable estimate of the steady-state values of i, g and d, then we can compute a reasonable estimate of k. Then, using the calculated value of k, an initial estimate of capital stock (k) multiplied with initial GDP(Y) can be obtained. In order to work out the initial estimate of k, we assume the steady state capital output ratio (d) = 0.07. We construct the steady-state growth rate (g): a weighted averaged of the countries average growth rate during the first ten years of which we have output and investment data and the world growth rate. The world growth rate is computed as 0.0234. Based on Easterly et al. (1993), we give a weight of 0.75 to the world growth rate and 0.25 to the country growth rate in computing an estimate of the steady-state growth rate for each individual country. We then compute i as the average investment rate during the first ten years for which there are data. Thus, with values for d, g, and i for each country, we estimate k for each country. To reduce the influence of business cycles on estimates of Y, we use the average real GDP value between 1989 and 1991 as an estimate of initial output. Thus, the capital stock, for example, in 1990 is given as Y*k.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akram, V., Rath, B.N. Exchange rate misalignment and total factor productivity growth in case of emerging market economies. Int Econ Econ Policy 15, 547–564 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0374-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0374-6
Keywords
- Exchange rate misalignments
- Total factor productivity
- Emerging market economies
- Panel cointegration
- Panel causality
- Panel GMM