Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical, Manometric, and Ultrasonographic Results of Pneumatic Balloon Dilatation vs. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was designed to compare the clinical, functional, and morphologic results of pneumatic balloon dilatation with lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

Methods

All patients with symptomatic chronic anal fissure were randomly assigned to pneumatic balloon dilatation or lateral internal sphincterotomy and invited to complete a standardized questionnaire inquiring about their symptoms. Anal ultrasonography and anal manometry were performed before and six months after surgery. A proctologic examination was performed between the fifth and sixth postoperative weeks. Anal continence, scored by using a validated continence grading scale, was evaluated preoperatively at 1 and 6 weeks and at 12 and 24 months.

Results

Fifty-three patients, who satisfied selection criteria, were enrolled in the trial. Four patients (7.5 percent) were lost to follow-up. Twenty-four patients (11 males; mean age, 42 ± 8.2 years) underwent pneumatic balloon dilatation and 25 patients (10 males; mean age, 44 ± 7.3 years) underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. Fissure-healing rates were 83.3 percent in the pneumatic balloon dilatation and 92 percent in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group. Recurrent anal fissure was observed in one patient (4 percent) after lateral internal sphincterotomy. At anal manometry, mean resting pressure decrements obtained after pneumatic balloon dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy were 30.5 and 34.3 percent, respectively. After pneumatic balloon dilatation, anal ultrasonography did not show any significant sphincter damage. At 24-month follow-up, the incidence of incontinence, irrespective of severity, was 0 percent in the pneumatic balloon dilatation group and 16 percent in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

As lateral internal sphincterotomy, pneumatic balloon dilatation grants a high anal fissure-healing rate but with a statistically significant reduction in postoperative anal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosen L, Abel ME, Gordon PH, et al. Practice parameters for the management of anal fissure. The Standards Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:206–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson RL. A review of operative procedures for anal fissure. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madoff RD, Fleshman JW. AGA technical review on the diagnosis and care of patients with anal fissure. Gastroenterology 2003;124:235–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khubchandani IT, Reed JF. Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure-in-ano. Br J Surg 1989;76:431–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Renzi A, Brusciano L, Pescatori M, et al. Pneumatic balloon dilatation for chronic anal fissure: a prospective, clinical, endosonographic, and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:121–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jorge J, Wexner SD. The etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G, Izzo G, Di Martino N. Stapled transanal rectal resection to treat obstructed defecation caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:661–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence: evaluation of 355 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nothmann BJ, Schuster MM. Internal anal sphincter derangement with anal fissures. Gastroenterology 1974;67:216–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Milito G, et al. Glyceryl trinitrate for chronic anal fissure-healing or headache? Results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:174–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ, Chadwick SJ, Melville D, Philips RK. Randomised controlled trial shows that glyceryl trinitrate heals anal fissure, higher doses are not more effective, and there is a high recurrence rate. Gut 1999;44:727–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maria G, Cassetta E, Gui D, Brisinda G, Bentivoglio AR, Albanese A. A comparison of botulinum toxin and saline for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med 1998;22:217–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jost WH. One hundred cases of anal fissure treated with botulin toxin: early and long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1029–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenhammer S. The surgical correction of chronic anal (sphincteric) contracture. S Afr Med J 1951;25:486–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bennet RC, Goligher JC. Results of internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. BMJ 1962;2:1500–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hardy KJ. Internal sphincterotomy: an appraisal with special reference to sequelae. Br J Surg 1967;54:30–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Notaras MJ. Lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure: a new technique. J R Soc Med 1969;62:713.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawley PR. The treatment of chronic fissure in-ano: a trial of methods. Br J Surg 1969;56:915–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman DC, Goligher JC. Lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy in treatment of anal fissure. BMJ 1970;3:673–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abcarian H. Surgical correction of chronic anal fissure: results of internal sphincterotomy vs. fissurectotomy midline sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:31–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pernikoff BJ, Einsenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Oliver GC, Salvati EP. Reappraisal of partial lateral internal sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiley M, Day P, Rieger N, Stephens J, Moore J. Open vs. closed lateral internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:847–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Allingham W. Diseases of the rectum. New York: Bermingham, 1882.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tuttle JP. A treatise on diseases of the anus, rectum and pelvic colon. New York: D Appleton, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hirschman LJ. Hand book of diseases of the rectum. St Louis: CB Mosby, 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus rectum and colon. London: Baillière Tindall, 1980:145.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen SL, Lund F, Nielsen OV, Tange G. Lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation in the treatment of fissure in ano in outpatients: a prospective randomised study. BMJ 1984;289:528–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marby M, Alexander-Williams J, Buchmann P, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare anal dilatation with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:308–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weaver RM, Ambrose NS, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Manual dilatation of the anus vs. lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano: results of a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:420–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nielsen MB, Ras Mussen O, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Risk of sphincter damage and anal incontinence after anal dilatation for fissure in ano. An endosonographic study. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:677–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sohn N, Eisemberg MM, Weinstein MA, Lugo RN, Ader J. Precise anorectal sphincter dilatation: its role in the therapy of anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:322–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Walfish S, Silberstein E. Balloon anal dilatation for anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol 1998;2:73–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adolfo Renzi M.D., Ph.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Renzi, A., Izzo, D., Di Sarno, G. et al. Clinical, Manometric, and Ultrasonographic Results of Pneumatic Balloon Dilatation vs. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 121–127 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9162-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9162-7

Key words

Navigation