Skip to main content
Log in

A randomized controlled trial to compare anal dilatation with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Summary

A prospective randomized trial has compared manual dilatation of the anus (MDA) during general anesthesia with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy (LSS) during local anesthesia for the management of anal fissure in 156 patients. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex and symptoms. There was no difference in the duration of time off work or early complications of treatment but, four months after operation, 93 per cent claimed to have been improved by MDA compared with 78 per cent after LSS (P<0.05). Recurrent fissure was recorded in 13 patients after LSS (29 per cent) compared with four (10 per cent) after MDA (P<0.02). There was a significant reduction in anal pressure at four months (P<0.02) after MDA, (123±31 to 97±33) and LSS (127±36 to 104±32), but the anal pressure remained unchanged by operation in all patients where pressures were measured with recurrent fissure. These data indicate that MDA gives better results than LSS for treatment of anal fissure and that successful treatment is associated with a reduction in anal pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR: Anal pressures in hemorrhoids and anal fissure. Am J Surg 134: 608, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arabi Y, Gatehouse D, Alexander-Williams J, et al: Rubber band ligation or lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for treatment of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 64: 737, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bates T: Rectal prolapse after anorectal dilatation in the elderly. Br Med J 2: 505, 1972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenhammer S: The evaluation of the internal anal sphincterotomy operation with special reference to anal fissure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109: 583, 1959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenhammer S: Internal anal sphincterotomy plus free dilatation versus anal stretch with special criticism of the anal stretch procedure for hemorrhoids: The recommended modern approach to hemorrhoid treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 17: 493, 1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer M, Hamelmann H: Dehnung ocer Sphincterotomie als Behandlung der primär-chronischen Analfissur. Chirurg 49: 215, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer M, Thermann M, Hamelmann H: Monometrische Untersuchungen des Analkanales bei der primär-chronischen Fissur vor und nach der Behandlung durch Dehnung oder Sphincterotomie. Chirurg 49: 111, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatehouse D, Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J, et al: Laberal subcutaneous sphincterotomy: Local or general anaesthetic? Proc R Soc Med 71: 29, 1978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hancock BD: Measurement of anal pressure and motility. Gut 17: 645, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hancock BD: The internal sphincter and anal fissure. Br J Surg 64: 92, 1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Millar DM: Subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Br J Surg 58: 737, 1971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Notaras MJ: The treatment of anal fissure by lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy—a technique and results. Br J Surg 58: 96, 1971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson JP: Haemorrhoids and fissure. Br J Hosp Med 14: 600, 1978

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Marby, M., Alexander-Williams, J., Buchmann, P. et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare anal dilatation with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 22, 308–311 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02609311

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02609311

Keywords

Navigation