Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Chewing Gum in Reducing Postoperative Ileus After Elective Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

Published studies comparing the addition of chewing gum to standardized postoperative care to shorten postoperative ileus showed controversial results. This study was designed to conduct a systematic review of all relevant trials on chewing gum to reduce postoperative ileus after colorectal resection.

Methods

All published trials that compared the additional use of gum chewing with standard postoperative management were identified from Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and All Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews between January 1991 and January 2007. The clinical outcomes were extracted and meta-analysis was performed by Forest plot review.

Results

Five randomized, controlled trials with 158 (94 males) patients with mean age of 61.9 years were included. Seventy-eight patients received an addition of gum chewing and 80 had standard postoperative care for colorectal resection. Operating time (P = 0.78) and blood loss (P = 0.48) were similar. All patients tolerated the gum without any side-effects. With combined standard postoperative care and gum chewing, the patients passed flatus 24.3 percent earlier (weighted mean difference, −20.8 hours; P = 0.0006) and had bowel movement 32.7 percent earlier (weighted mean difference, −33.3 hours; P = 0.0002). They were discharged 17.6 percent earlier than those having ordinary postoperative treatment (weighted mean difference, −2.4 days; P < 0.00001). The gum-chewing group was associated with similar overall postoperative complication rate (odds ratio, 0.45; P = 0.05) with individual complication showing a trend favoring gum chewing, although they were not of statistical significance. Readmission (odds ratio, 0.36; P = 0.24) and reoperation rates (odds ratio, 1.36; P = 0.83) of the two groups were similar.

Conclusions

The use of gum chewing in the postoperative period is a safe method to stimulate bowel motility and reduce ileus after colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livingston EH, Passaro EP. Postoperative ileus. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:121–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shibata Y, Toyoda S, Nimura Y, Miyati M. Patterns of intestinal motility recovery during the early stage following abdominal surgery: clinical and manometric study. World J Surg 1997;21:806–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Graber JN, Schulte WJ, Condon RE, Cowles VE. Relationship of duration of postoperative ileus to extent and site of operative dissection. Surgery 1982;92:87–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petros JG, Realica R, Ahmad S, Rimm EB, Robillard RJ. Patient-controlled analgesia and prolonged ileus after uncomplicated colectomy. Am J Surg 1995;170:371–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kehlet H. Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg 2001;182(5A Suppl):3S–10S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delaney CP. Clinical perspective on postoperative ileus and the effect of opiates. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004;169(Suppl 2):61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systemic review on short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colon and recto-sigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:375–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:61–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferraz AA, Cowles VE, Condon RE, et al. Nonopiod analgesics shorten the duration of postoperative ileus. Am Surg 1995;61:1079–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheape JD, Wexner SD, James K, Jagelman DG. Does metoclopramide reduce the length of ileus after colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:437–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown TA, McDonald J, Williard W. A prospective, randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of cisapride after colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 1999;177:399–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tollesson PO, Cassuto J, Rimback G, Faxen A, Bergman L, Mattsson E. Treatment of postoperative paralytic ileus with cisapride. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:477–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith AJ, Nissan A, Lanouette NM, et al. Prokinetic effect of erythromycin after colorectal surgery: randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:333–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonacini M, Quiason S, Reynolds M, Gaddis M, Pemberton B, Smith O. Effect of intravenous erythromycin on postoperative ileus. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:208–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart BT, Woods RJ, Collopy BT, et al. Early feeding after elective open colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. ANZ J Surg 1998;68:125–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi J, O’Connell TX. Safe and effective early postoperative feeding and hospital discharge after open colon resection. Am Surg 1996;62:853–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carr CS, Ling KD, Boulos P, Singer M. Randomized trial of safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative enteral feeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection. BMJ 1996;312:869–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Soffer EE, Adrian TE. Effect of meal composition and sham feeding on duodenojejunal motility in humans. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1009–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stern RM, Crawford HE, Stewart WR, et al. Sham feeding: cephalic-vagal influences on gastric myoelectric activity. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:521–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anonymous. By gum, it might be good for you. Recent studies show that gum chewing may speed recovery from bowel surgery. Harv Health Lett 2006;31:5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Review Manager. RevMan User Guideline Version 4.2 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Asao T, Kuwano H, Nakamura J, Morinaga N, Hirayama I, Ide M. Gum chewing enhances early recovery from postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:30–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schuster R, Grewal N, Greaney GC, Waxman K. Gum chewing reduces ileus after elective open sigmoid colectomy. Arch Surg 2006;141:174–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Quah HM, Samad A, Neathey AJ, Hay DJ, Maw A. Does gum chewing reduce postoperative ileus following open colectomy for left-sided colon and rectal cancer? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Colorect Dis 2006;8:64–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matros E, Rocha F, Zinner M, et al. Does gum chewing ameliorate postoperative ileus? Results of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:773–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirayama I, Suzuki M, Ide M, Asao T, Kuwano H. Gum-chewing stimulates bowel motility after surgery for colorectal cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2006;53:206–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miedema BW. Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy [letter]. J Am Coll Surg 2003;195:901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holte K, Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 2000;87:1480–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luckey A, Livingston E, Tache Y. Mechanisms and treatment of postoperative ileus. Arch Surg 2003;138:206–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Simoons RL, Baucer AJ. Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg 1998;228:652–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mamel JJ. Gastric emptying disorders. In: Nord HJ, Brady PG, eds. Critical care gastroenterology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1982:113–28.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Deloof S, Croix D, Tramu G. The role of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in the inhibition of antral and pyloric electrical activity in rabbits. J Auton Nerv Syst 1988;22:167–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hasler WL. Pharmacotherapy for intestinal motor and sensory disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2003;32:707–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Resnick J, Greenwald DA, Brandt LJ. Delayed gastric emptying and postoperative ileus after nongastric abdominal surgery: part 1. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:751–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Delaney CP, Weese JL, Hyman NH, et al. Phase III trial of Alviompan, a novel, peripherally, acting, mu opioid antagonist, for postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;48:114–29.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Viscusi ER, Goldstein S, Witkowski T, et al. Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, compared with placebo in postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 2006;20:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hartsell PA, Frazee RC, Harrison JB, Smith RW. Early postoperative feeding after elective colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 1997;132:518–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Di Fronzo LA, Cymerman J, O’Connell TX. Factors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection. Arch Surg 1999;134:941–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen PM, Jensen P, et al. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilization. Lancet 1995;345:763–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:606–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002;89:446–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, Kehlet H. Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kellow JE, Delvaux M, Azpiroz F, Camilleri M, Quigley EM, Thompson DG. Principles of applied neurogastroenterology: physiology/motility-sensation. Gut 1999;45(Suppl 2):II17–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Miedema BW. Methods for decreasing postoperative gut dysmotility. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:365–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jepsen JM, Skoubo K, Elsborg L. Rectosigmoid motility response to sham feeding in irritable bowel syndrome. Evidence of a cephalic phase. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:53–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts JP, Benson MJ, Rogers J, Deeks JJ, Williams NS. Characterization of distal colonic motility in early postoperative period and effect of colonic anastomosis. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:1961–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranda K. Y. Chan M.B.B.S., F.R.A.C.S..

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, M.K.Y., Law, W.L. Use of Chewing Gum in Reducing Postoperative Ileus After Elective Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 2149–2157 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9039-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9039-9

Key words

Navigation