Purpose
Symptoms caused by hemorrhoids are worse during defecation because of relaxation of the anal canal causing prolapse. We reviewed our experience of multiple rubber band ligations in a relaxed state of the anal canal using local anesthesia.
Methods
Forty-five patients, the majority of whom had Grade 2 or 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids, who required treatment underwent four quadrant local anesthetic infiltration in the submucosa of the upper anal canal. We used 1.5 ml of 0.25 percent bupivacaine in 1:200,000 epinephrine, 5 mm above the dentate line.
Results
The exposure of the relaxed anal canal was excellent, allowing multiple introductions of the anoscope and application of multiple bands without discomfort. The average number of bands applied in a single session was 3.84 (range, 1–7). Forty-two percent of the patients had banding performed at four sites. Complications following the procedure were minimal. Forty-seven percent of patients reported pain, with an average pain score of 5.29 (range, 1–10). Forty-seven percent of patients did not experience any pain after the procedure. Seventy-three percent had relief of symptoms; 16 percent had symptomatic recurrences, one-half of them were successfully treated by repeat banding after local anesthetic; only one patient required surgical hemorrhoidectomy.
Conclusions
Local anesthesia of the upper anal canal results in full relaxation and maximal mucosal redundancy of the anal canal simulating the anus in a natural condition during defecation. This gives an excellent exposure of the anal canal, enabling an accurate and multiple applications of rubber bands without pain during and shortly after the procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WR Schouten PH Gordon (1999) Anorectal physiology PH Gordon S Nivatvongs (Eds) Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum and anus EditionNumber2nd ed. Quality Medical Publishing St. Louis 55–86
WC Bernstein (1983) ArticleTitleWhat are hemorrhoids and what is their relationship to portal venous system? Dis Colon Rectum 26 829–834 Occurrence Handle6605842 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02554764 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuD2MjhtFw%3D
PA Haas TA Fox SuffixJr GP Haas (1984) ArticleTitleThe pathogenesis of hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 27 442–450 Occurrence Handle6745015 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02555533 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuB28%2FptFU%3D
WH Thomson (1975) ArticleTitleThe nature of hemorrhoids Br J Surg 62 542–552 Occurrence Handle1174785 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800620710 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSmD3MbntlE%3D
HH Lee RJ Spencer RW Beart SuffixJr (1994) ArticleTitleMultiple hemorrhoidal bandings in a single session Dis Colon Rectum 37 37–41 Occurrence Handle8287745 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02047212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3MnjvVM%3D
BC Peng DG Jayne YH Ho (2003) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of rubber band ligation vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles Dis Colon Rectum 46 291–297 Occurrence Handle12626901 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6543-z
ML Corman JF Gravie T Hager et al. (2003) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party: indications, contraindications and technique Colorectal Dis 5 304–310 Occurrence Handle12814406 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00483.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szkslajtw%3D%3D
JM Correa-Rovelo O Tellez L Obregon et al. (2002) ArticleTitleStapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy. A randomized, clinical trial Dis Colon Rectum 45 1367–1375 Occurrence Handle12394436 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6426-3
RG Molloy D Kingsmore (2000) ArticleTitleLife-threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomy Lancet 355 810 Occurrence Handle10711934 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nsFSqug%3D%3D
A Maw KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2002) ArticleTitleRetroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Report of a case and review of the literature Dis Colon Rectum 45 826–828 Occurrence Handle12072637 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6304-z
VS Iyer I Shrier PH Gordon (2004) ArticleTitleLong-term outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal hemorrhoids Dis Colon Rectum 47 1364–1370 Occurrence Handle15484351 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0591-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crht1WlsQ%3D%3D
WL Law KW Chu (1999) ArticleTitleTriple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. Prospective, randomized trial of use of local anesthetic injection Dis Colon Rectum 42 363–366 Occurrence Handle10223757 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236354 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jvVaksQ%3D%3D
GD Hooker EA Plewes C Rajgopal et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLocal injection of bupivacaine after rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Prospective, randomized study Dis Colon Rectum 42 174–179 Occurrence Handle10211492 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237123 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3is1Cktg%3D%3D
WH Thomson (2000) ArticleTitleStapled hemorrhoidectomy [letter] Colorectal Dis 2 310 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2000.00188.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprints are not available.
About this article
Cite this article
Selvasekar, C., Suwanthanma, W., Nivatvongs, S. et al. Local Anesthesia of Upper Anal Canal for Multiple Rubber Band Ligation: Description of Technique and Preliminary Results. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 1481–1483 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0299-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0299-1