Abstract
PURPOSE: Rubber band ligation is a common office procedure for hemorrhoids. Triple rubber band ligation in a single session has been shown to be a safe and economical way of treating hemorrhoids. However, postligation discomfort after triple rubber band ligation is not uncommon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of local anesthetic injection to the banded hemorrhoidal tissue in reducing postligation discomfort. METHODS: Patients attending an outpatient clinic for symptomatic hemorrhoids suitable for triple rubber band ligation were randomly assigned to two groups. In the treatment group rubber band ligation was performed at three columns of hemorrhoids, and 1 to 2 ml of 2 percent lignocaine was injected into the banded hemorrhoidal tissue. In the control group triple rubber band ligation was performed in a similar manner, but local anesthetic was not given. Patients were followed up by telephone at the second week and in the clinic after six weeks. RESULTS: From April to August 1996, 101 patients entered the trial and were treated with triple rubber band ligation. Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to the local anesthetic injection group and 39 to the control group. Overall good to excellent results occurred in 89 percent of patients, and there was no difference between the two groups. Postligation pain occurred in 26 and 20 percent of patients in the treatment and control groups, respectively (P>0.05). Postligation tenesmus occurred in 32 and 41 percent of patients in the treatment and control groups, respectively (P>0.05). No patients suffered from septic complications or bleeding that required transfusion. CONCLUSION: Triple rubber band ligation in a single session is a safe, economical, and effective way of treating symptomatic hemorrhoids. Postligation pain and tenesmus occurred in 24 and 37 percent, respectively. Discomfort was usually tolerable. Local anesthetic injection to the banded hemorrhoidal tissue did not help to reduce postligation discomfort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic hemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:477–81.
Khubchandani IT. A randomized comparison of single and multiple rubber band ligations. dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:705–8.
Poon GP, Chu KW, Lau WY,et al. Conventionalvs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:836–8.
Tchirkow G, Haas PA, Fox TA Jr. Injection of a local anesthetic solution into hemorrhoidal bundles following rubber band ligation. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:62–3.
Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation, an epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990;98:380–6.
Blaisdell PC. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 1958;96:401.
Barron J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 1963;105:563–70.
Gartell PC, Sheridan RJ, McGinn FP. Out-patient treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial to compare rubber band ligation with phenol injection. Br J Surg 1985;72:478–9.
Ambrose NS, Hares MM, Alexander Williams J, Keighley MR. Prospective randomised comparison of photocoagulation and rubber band ligation in treatment of haemorrhoids. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 1983;286:1389–91.
MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:687–94.
Lau WY, Chow HP, Poon GP, Wong SH. Rubber band ligation of three primary hemorrhoids in a single session: a safe and effective procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:336–9.
Lee HH, Spencer RJ, Beart RW Jr. Multiple hemorrhoidal bandings in a single session. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:37–41.
Mattana C, Maria G, Pescatori M. Rubber-band ligation of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse in constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:372–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Law, Wl., Chu, Kw. Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 363–366 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236354
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236354