Skip to main content
Log in

Anal Fistula Plug for Closure of Difficult Anorectal Fistula: A Prospective Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Complex high and recurrent fistulas remain a surgical challenge. Simple division, i.e., fistulotomy, will likely result in fecal incontinence. Various surgical treatment options for these fistulas have shown disappointing results. Recently a biologic anal fistula plug was developed to treat these high transsphincteric fistulas. To assess the results of the anal fistula plug in patients with complex high perianal fistulas, a prospective, two-center, clinical study was undertaken.

Methods

Between April 2006 and October 2006, a consecutive series of patients with difficult therapy-resistant high fistulas were enrolled. During surgery, the internal fistula tract opening was identified. A conical shaped collagen plug was pulled through the fistula tract. Any remaining portion of the plug that was not implanted in the tract was removed. The plug was fixed at the internal opening with a deep 3/0 polydioxanone suture.

Results

Seventeen patients with a median age of 45 (range, 27–75) years were included. Of these patients, 71 percent (12/17) were male. At a median length of follow-up of 7 (range, 3–9) months, 7 of 17 fistulas had healed (41 percent). In ten patients, the fistula recurred.

Conclusions

In these small series of 17 patients with difficult high perianal fistulas, a success rate of 41 percent is noted. Larger series, preferably in trial setting, must be performed to establish the efficacy of the anal fistula plug in perianal fistula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:723–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC. Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1194–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, van Gemert WG. Long-term outcome following mucosal advancement flap for high perianal fistulas and fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: Recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease?. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:784–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan GN, Owen HA, Torkington J, Lunniss PJ, Nicholls RJ, Cohen CR. Long-term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula. Br J Surg 2004;91:476– 80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Phillips RK, et al. Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zmora O, Neufeld D, Ziv Y, et al. Prospective, multicenter evaluation of highly concentrated fibrin glue in the treatment of complex cryptogenic perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2167–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Champagne BJ, O’Connor LM, Ferguson M, Orangio GR, Schertzer ME, Armstrong DN. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of cryptoglandular fistulas: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1817–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ortiz H, Marzo J. Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high trans-sphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas. Br J Surg 2000;87:1680–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sonoda T, Hull T, Piedmonte MR, Fazio VW. Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Joo JS, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Endorectal advancement flap in perianal Crohn’s disease. Am Surg 1998;64:147–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schouten WR, Zimmerman DD, Briel JW. Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1419–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor L, Champagne BJ, Ferguson MA, Orangio GR, Schertzer ME, Armstrong DN. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn’s anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1817–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN. Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Frederik M. Slors M.D., Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

van Koperen, P.J., D’Hoore, A., Wolthuis, A.M. et al. Anal Fistula Plug for Closure of Difficult Anorectal Fistula: A Prospective Study. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 2168–2172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0298-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0298-2

Key words

Navigation