Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Diverting Stoma Is Not Necessary when Performing a Handsewn Coloanal Anastomosis for Lower Rectal Cancer

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Although a temporary diverting stoma is a frequent surgical procedure for the protection of anastomosis in a sphincter-preserving operation for lower rectal cancer, its impact on anastomotic leakage is not conclusive. This study was designed to evaluate anastomotic complications after ultralow anterior resection and handsewn coloanal anastomosis without a diverting stoma for lower rectal cancer patients.

Methods

Between January 1995 and December 2005, 96 patients were treated by ultralow anterior resection and handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer. Fifty-one patients received preoperative concurrent chemoradiation, whereas 45 had no preoperative treatment. No diverting stoma was created in any of these cases. The anastomotic complications were evaluated between the groups.

Results

Six of 96 patients (6.1 percent) developed anastomotic complications: three anastomotic stenoses, one partial anastomotic dehiscence, one retrorectal abscess, and one rectovaginal fistula. All of the complications occurred in the preoperative radiation group, whereas none from the nonradiation group had an anastomotic complication (P = 0.017). The patients with stenosis and partial dehiscence were managed conservatively. The patient with retrorectal abscess was treated with debridement, irrigation and drainage, and seton procedure with a transanal approach. The patient with rectovaginal fistula underwent a second coloanal anastomosis.

Conclusions

The anastomotic complication rate was low even without a diverting stoma. This study suggests that a diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer however, an effort should be made for healthy anastomotic healing in patients with rectal cancer who are preoperatively radiated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ND Karanjia AP Corder PJ Holdsworth RJ Heald (1991) ArticleTitleRisk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis Br J Surg 78 196–198 Occurrence Handle2015471 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800780221 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C1MfntFU%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M Mohiuddin GJ Marks (1987) ArticleTitleHigh dose preoperative radiation and sphincter preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13 839–842 Occurrence Handle3583853 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiB387otFQ%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S Pucciarelli P Toppan ML Friso et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePreoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer does not affect early postoperative morbidity and mortality in low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 42 1276–1284 Occurrence Handle10528764 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234213 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvls1SgsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. JP Bannon GJ Marks M Mohiuddin J Rakinic NZ Jian D Nagle (1995) ArticleTitleRadical and local excisional methods of sphincter-sparing surgery after high-dose radiation for cancer of the distal 3 cm of the rectum Ann Surg Oncol 2 221–227 Occurrence Handle7641018 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02307027 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA28fktl0%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F Bretagnol E Rullier C Laurent F Zerbib R Gontier J Saric (2004) ArticleTitleComparison of functional results and quality of life between intersphincteric resection and conventional coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 47 832–838 Occurrence Handle15108027 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0523-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ND Karanjia AP Corder P Bearn RJ Heald (1994) ArticleTitleLeakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 81 1224–1226 Occurrence Handle7953369 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800810850 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2c7hs1A%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K Mealy P Burke J Hyland (1992) ArticleTitleAnterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safety Br J Surg 79 305–307 Occurrence Handle1576494 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800790406 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B2cfjvFI%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NY Wong KW Eu (2005) ArticleTitleA defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study Dis Colon Rectum 48 2076–2079 Occurrence Handle16086220 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-005-0146-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnosVKjsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F Chen M Stuart (1996) ArticleTitleThe morbidity of defunctioning stomata ANZ J Surg 66 218–221 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MvgtF0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J Camilleri-Brennan RJ Steele (2002) ArticleTitleProspective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy Colorectal Dis 4 167–171 Occurrence Handle12780610 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00352.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. FH Remzi VW Fazio E Gorgun et al. (2006) ArticleTitleThe outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy Dis Colon Rectum 49 470–477 Occurrence Handle16518581 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-006-0509-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. CM Bailey JM Wheeler M Birks R Farouk (2003) ArticleTitleThe incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection Colorectal Dis 5 331–334 Occurrence Handle12814411 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.4.s1.1_78.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3oslCisw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. KC Peeters RA Tollenaar CA Marijnen et al. (2005) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic failure after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer Br J Surg 92 211–216 Occurrence Handle15584062 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4806 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7hslyjsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. I Gastinger F Marusch R Steinert S Wolff F Koeckerling H Lippert (2005) ArticleTitleProtective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma Br J Surg 92 1137–1142 Occurrence Handle15997447 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.5045 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvkvVKluw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B Ravo N Metwally P Castera PJ Polansky R Ger (1988) ArticleTitleThe importance of intraluminal anastomotic fecal contact and peritonitis in colonic anastomotic leakages. An experimental study Dis Colon Rectum 31 868–871 Occurrence Handle3180959 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02554851 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaD3s%2Fht1U%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholls RJ, Dozois RR, eds. Surgery of the colon and rectum. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1997:882–6

  17. HJ Sugerman EL Sugerman JG Meador HH Newsome ParticleJr. JM Kellum ParticleJr. EJ DeMaria (2000) ArticleTitleIleal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion Ann Surg 232 530–541 Occurrence Handle10998651 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200010000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fhs1eitQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. AW Gooszen RH Geelkerken J Hermans MB Lagaay HG Gooszen (1998) ArticleTitleTemporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy Br J Surg 85 76–79 Occurrence Handle9462389 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00526.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7itl2nsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DP Edwards A Leppington-Clarke R Sexton RJ Heald BJ Moran (2001) ArticleTitleStoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial Br J Surg 88 360–363 Occurrence Handle11260099 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01727.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtVaqtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. WL Law KW Chu HK Choi (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision Br J Surg 89 704–708 Occurrence Handle12027979 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02082.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383ovVSqsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. N Dehni RD Schlegel C Cunningham M Guiguet E Tiret R Parc (1998) ArticleTitleInfluence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis Br J Surg 85 1114–1117 Occurrence Handle9718009 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00790.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czot1Wjuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. CA Mathias BG Wolff JH Pemberton et al. (1999) ArticleTitleColoanal anastomosis: is a defunctioning stoma necessary? Tech Coloproctol 3 79–82 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101510050020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y Nagamatsu K Shirouzu H Isomoto Y Ogata I Tsuchida Y Akagi (1998) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of lower rectal cancer with sphincter preservation using handsewn coloanal anastomosis Surg Today 28 696–700 Occurrence Handle9697261 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02484614 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czmt1Kjsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M Sailer KH Fuchs M Fein A Thiede (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction Br J Surg 89 1108–1117 Occurrence Handle12190675 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02194.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjsVWisg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. JK Lin HS Wang SH Yang JK Jiang WS Chen TC Lin (2002) ArticleTitleComparison between straight and J-pouch coloanal anastomoses in surgery for rectal cancer Surg Today 32 487–492 Occurrence Handle12107771 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005950200082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. RA Gamagami A Liagre P Chiotasso G Istvan F Lazorthes (1999) ArticleTitleColoanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer: prospective study of oncologic results Dis Colon Rectum 42 1272–1275 Occurrence Handle10528763 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvls1Sgsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. A Fichera F Michelassi (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term prospective assessment of functional results after proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis J Gastrointest Surg 5 153–157 Occurrence Handle11331477 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80027-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzjt1Cltg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. M el-Malt W Ceelen C Broecke ParticleVan den et al. (2003) ArticleTitleInfluence of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil on colonic anastomotic healing: experimental study in rats Acta Chir Belg 103 309–314 Occurrence Handle12914369 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3sznvVOktg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. N Kurt E Tarcan A Cokmez et al. (2004) ArticleTitleThe effect of tegafur and uracil combination on colonic anastomotic strength: an experimental study on rats Hepatogastroenterology 51 128–130 Occurrence Handle15011847 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXisFKjt7g%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. MJ Stoop R Dirksen T Wobbes T Hendriks (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of early postoperative 5-fluorouracil and ageing on the healing capacity of experimental intestinal anastomoses Br J Surg 85 1535–1538 Occurrence Handle9823919 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00868.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FjvFGhtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. JW Milsom A Senagore RK Walshaw et al. (1992) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiation therapy produces an early and persistent reduction in colorectal anastomotic blood flow J Surg Res 53 464–469 Occurrence Handle1434596 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-4804(92)90091-D Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD28%2FpslQ%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. MT Eriksen A Wibe J Norstein J Haffner JN Wiig (2005) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients Colorectal Dis 7 51–57 Occurrence Handle15606585 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnjtFGqsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. J Garcia-Aguilar E Hernandez de Anda P Sirivongs SH Lee RD Madoff DA Rothenberger (2003) ArticleTitleA pathologic complete response to preoperative chemoradiation is associated with lower local recurrence and improved survival in rectal cancer patients treated by mesorectal excision Dis Colon Rectum 46 298–304 Occurrence Handle12626903 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6545-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. H Birgisson L Pahlman U Gunnarsson B Glimelius (2005) ArticleTitleAdverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long-term follow-up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial J Clin Oncol 23 8697–8705 Occurrence Handle16314629 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. A Picciocchi C Coco P Magistrelli et al. (1994) ArticleTitleConcomitant preoperative radiochemotherapy in operable locally advanced rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 37 69–72 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02048435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T Watanabe S Kazama G Tshurita et al. (2004) ArticleTitlePreoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancer and sphincter saving operation [meeting abstract] Dis Colon Rectum 47 A1105

    Google Scholar 

  37. A Furst S Suttner A Agha A Beham KW Jauch (2003) ArticleTitleColonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study Dis Colon Rectum 46 1161–1166 Occurrence Handle12972958 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6707-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Jung Wook Huh M.D., Yoon Ah Park M.D. & Seung Kook Sohn M.D., Ph.D.

  2. Department of Surgery, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 146-92, Dogok-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul, 135-720, South Korea

    Seung Kook Sohn M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Jung Wook Huh M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoon Ah Park M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seung Kook Sohn M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Kook Sohn M.D., Ph.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Huh, J.W., Park, Y.A. & Sohn, S.K. A Diverting Stoma Is Not Necessary when Performing a Handsewn Coloanal Anastomosis for Lower Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 1040–1046 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0233-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0233-6

Key words

Search

Navigation