Skip to main content
Log in

Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer

Prospective study of oncologic results

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Jeopardizing cure and risking high local recurrence have served as arguments against sphincter-saving resection for patients with distal third rectal cancer. This prospective study examines and compares the local recurrence and survival rates in patients with distal third rectal cancer treated by either coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: Between 1977 and 1993, 174 patients underwent coloanal anastomoses and 38 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection. All tumors were located 4 to 7 cm from the anal verge. One hundred ninety-three patients (91 percent) underwent rectal excision with a curative intent. Mean follow-up was 66 months after sphincter-saving resection and 65 months after abdominoperineal resection. RESULTS: Mean anastomotic height from the anal verge was 2.3 cm after sphincter-saving resection. Overall local recurrence rate was 7.9 percent after sphincter-saving resection and 12.9 percent after abdominoperineal resection. The five-year actuarial survival rate was 78 percent after sphincter-saving resection and 74 percent after abdominoperineal resection. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence and survival are not compromised in patients with distal third rectal cancer when treated by sphincter-saving resection, provided that oncologic principles are not violated. Coloanal anastomosis can be performed with an acceptable morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothenberger DA, Wong D. Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 1992;16:478–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimeter rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazorthes F, Voigt JJ, Roguer J, Chiotasso P, Chevreau P. Distal intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum correlated with lymph node involvement. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:45–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavaliere F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr. Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer: long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:807–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohiuddin M, Marks G. Patterns of recurrence following high-dose preoperative radiation and sphincter-preserving surgery for cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:117–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paty PB, Warren EE, Cohen AM, Lauwers G. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Bugat R. Synchronous abdomino transsphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: new technique for direct coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:573–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sagar PM, Pemberton JH. Surgical management of locally recurrent cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:293–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian census. Br J Surg 1995;82:1297–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IA,et al. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 1994;344:707–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams NS, Durdey P, Johnston D. The outcome following sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:595–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rullier E, Laurent C, Carles J, Saric J, Michel P, Parneix M. Local recurrence of low rectal cancer after abdomino perineal and anterior resection. Br J Surg 1997;84:525–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sweeney JL, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Resection and sutured peranal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:103–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vernava AM III, Robbins PL, Brabbe GW. Restorative resection: coloanal anastomosis for benign and malignant disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:690–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wunderlich M, Karner-Hanusch J, Schiessel R. Results of coloanal anastomosis: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:157–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallböök O, Johansson K, Sjödahl R. Laser-Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma—comparison between the straight and colonic J-pouch reconstruction. Br J Surg 1996;83:389–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.

About this article

Cite this article

Gamagami, R.A., Liagre, A., Chiotasso, P. et al. Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1272–1275 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234212

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234212

Key words

Navigation