Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients: Outcome and Cost-Benefit Analysis

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic rectal resection on short-term postoperative morbidity and costs.

Methods

A total of 168 patients with rectal cancer were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 83) or open (n = 85) resection. Outcome parameters were: postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, quality of life, long-term survival, and local recurrences. The mean follow-up period was 53.6 months. Cost-benefit analysis was based on hospital costs.

Results

Operative time was 53 minutes longer in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.0001). Postoperative morbidity rate was 28.9 percent in the laparoscopic vs. 40 percent in the open group (P = 0.18). The mean length of hospital stay was 10 (4.9) days in the laparoscopic group and 13.6 (10) days in the open group (P = 0.004). Local recurrence rate and five-year survival were similar in both groups; however, the limited number of patients does not allow firm conclusions. Quality of life was better in the laparoscopic group only in the first year after surgery (P < 0.0001). The additional charge in the laparoscopic group was $1,748 per patient randomized ($1,194 the result of surgical instruments and $554 the result of longer operative time). The saving in the laparoscopic group was $1,396 per patient randomized ($647 the result of shorter length of hospital stay and $749 the result of the lower cost of postoperative complications). The net balance resulted in $351 extra cost per patient randomly allocated to the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions

Short-term postoperative morbidity was similar in the two groups. Laparoscopic resection reduced length of hospital stay, improved first-year quality of life, and slightly increased hospital costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H Nelson DJ Sargent HS Wieand et al. (2004) ArticleTitleA comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050–2059 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa032651 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXktVemsbw%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. EJ Hazebroek InstitutionalAuthorNameColor Study Group (2002) ArticleTitleCOLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer Surg Endosc 16 949–953 Occurrence Handle12163961 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8165-z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vgvFGmsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M Janson I Bjorholt P Carlsson et al. (2004) ArticleTitleRandomised clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer Br J Surg 91 409–417 Occurrence Handle15048739 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4469 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7lsVWgsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial Lancet 359 2224–2229 Occurrence Handle12103285 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O Aziz V Constantinides PP Tekkis et al. (2006) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis Ann Surg Oncol 13 413–424 Occurrence Handle16450220 Occurrence Handle10.1245/ASO.2006.05.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MM Davies DW Larson (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: the state of the art Surg Oncol 13 111–118 Occurrence Handle15572093 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.suronc.2004.08.003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crpvFKgtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M Morino U Parini G Giraudo et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients Ann Surg 237 335–342 Occurrence Handle12616116 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200303000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. M Braga A Vignali W Zuliani M Frasson C Serio ParticleDi V Carlo (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial Ann Surg 242 890–895 Occurrence Handle16327499 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000189573.23744.59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M Braga A Vignali L Gianotti et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcome Ann Surg 236 759–767 Occurrence Handle12454514 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F Bozzetti M Braga L Gianotti C Gavazzi L Mariani (2001) ArticleTitlePostoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial Lancet 358 1487–92 Occurrence Handle11705560 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06578-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnltFKqsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. PM King JM Blazeby P Ewings et al. (2006) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme Br J Surg 93 300–308 Occurrence Handle16363014 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.5216 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD287ivVGrsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M Braga M Frasson A Vignali W Zuliani V Civelli V Carlo ParticleDi (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival Dis Colon Rectum 48 2217–2223 Occurrence Handle16228828 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-005-0185-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. CP Delaney RP Kiran AJ Senagore K Brady VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleCase-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery Ann Surg 238 67–72 Occurrence Handle12832967 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. KL Leung SP Kwok SC Lam et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial Lancet 363 1187–1192 Occurrence Handle15081650 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. HM Quah DG Jayne KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2002) ArticleTitleBladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer Br J Surg 89 1551–1556 Occurrence Handle12445065 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02275.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38noslajtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. SE Araujo AH Silva eSousa Particleda SuffixJr FG Campos ParticleDe et al. (2003) ArticleTitleConventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 58 133–140 Occurrence Handle12894309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. PJ Guillou P Quirke H Thorpe et al. (2005) ArticleTitleShort-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 365 1718–1726 Occurrence Handle15894098 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. JW Fleshman SD Wexner M Anvari et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 930–939 Occurrence Handle10411441 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237105 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzjslanug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. KL Leung SP Kwok WY Lau et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma Surg Endosc 14 67–70 Occurrence Handle10653240 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900014 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7hs12nsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. RP Baker EE White L Titu GS Duthie PW Lee JR Monson (2002) ArticleTitleDoes laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum compromise long-term survival? Dis Colon Rectum 45 1481–1485 Occurrence Handle12432295 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6454-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. F Feliciotti M Guerrieri AM Paganini et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients Surg Endosc 17 1530–1535 Occurrence Handle12874687 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3sngs1Oiug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Braga M.D..

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 3 to 7, 2006.

About this article

Cite this article

Braga, M., Frasson, M., Vignali, A. et al. Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients: Outcome and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 464–471 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5

Key words

Navigation