Skip to main content
Log in

Malone Antegrade Continent Enema: An Alternative to Resection in Severe Defecation Disorders

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate patient self-reported outcome of the Malone antegrade continent enema at a single institution in patients suffering from severe defecatory disorders.

Methods

A total of 18 patients (15 females; median age, 31 (range, 12–63) years) underwent a Malone antegrade continent enema (August 1999 to September 2004). The Malone antegrade continent enema technique has been previously described; however, in this series emphasis was placed on method appendix tunneling. Patients’ charts were reviewed and follow-up telephone interviews were conducted. Indications for Malone antegrade continent enema were chronic constipation (n = 12), intractable fecal incontinence (n = 5), or both (n = 1). The underlying pathology included neurogenic (n = 2), congenital (n = 4), postsurgery-related (n = 4), irritable bowel syndrome (n = 6), and megarectum (n = 2). The appendix (n = 17) or cecum (n = 1) was used as a conduit.

Results

The mean follow-up was 18.5 (range, 3–67) months. Fourteen patients (78 percent) still use the Malone antegrade continent enema routinely and report good functional outcome. Three patients (20 percent) required stoma creation as subsequent alternate treatment. A total of 10 patients experienced 12 complications: 3 perioperative (infections) and 9 postoperative Malone antegrade continent enema use/nonuse complications (4 stomal orifice strictures, 2 fecal impactions, 2 appendiceal perforations, and 1 irrigation catheter knot). No patient experienced leakage from the appendiceal stoma. During the follow-up interval, one patient underwent proctectomy for megarectum. No failures occurred in patients with congenital or neurogenic disorders.

Conclusions

Malone antegrade continent enema is a reasonable option for the treatment of select patients with severe defecation disorders. Good functional patient self-reported outcome was achieved by 78 percent of patients. The social inconvenience of stoma leakage is avoided with appropriate surgical technique. Malone antegrade continent enema is one option that provides a less invasive surgical alternative than colectomy or ileostomy for severe defecation disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K Blachut W Bednarz L Paradowski (2004) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of constipation Rocz Akad Med Bialymst 49 47–52 Occurrence Handle15631313 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FgsFylsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. AE Bharucha (2004) ArticleTitleTreatment of severe and intractable constipation Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 7 291–298 Occurrence Handle15238204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Wald (2002) ArticleTitleSlow transit constipation Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 5 279–283 Occurrence Handle12095475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AM El-Tawil (2002) ArticleTitlePersistence of abdominal symptoms after successful surgery for idiopathic slow transit constipation South Med J 95 1042–1046 Occurrence Handle12356105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. K Thaler A Dinnewitzer M Oberwalder et al. (2005) ArticleTitleQuality of life after colectomy for colonic inertia Tech Coloproctol 9 133–137 Occurrence Handle16007361 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10151-005-0211-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnhsValtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. GP FitzHarris J Garcia-Aguilar SC Parker et al. (2003) ArticleTitleQuality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: both quality and quantity count Dis Colon Rectum 46 433–440 Occurrence Handle12682533 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6576-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AJ Pikarsky JJ Singh EG Weiss et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of patients undergoing colectomy for colonic inertia Dis Colon Rectum 44 179–183 Occurrence Handle11227933 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234290 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ot1Sltw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G Nylund T Oresland S Fasth S Nordgren (2001) ArticleTitleLong-term outcome after colectomy in severe idiopathic constipation Colorectal Dis 3 253–258 Occurrence Handle12790968 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00249.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3msFSgtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C Sample R Gupta F Bamehriz M Anvari (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic subtotal colectomy for colonic inertia J Gastrointest Surg 9 803–808 Occurrence Handle15985235 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.gassur.2005.01.294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MA Gladman SM Scott PJ Lunniss NS Williams (2005) ArticleTitleSystematic review of surgical options for idiopathic megarectum and megacolon Ann Surg 241 562–574 Occurrence Handle15798457 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000157140.69695.d3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A Alves B Coffin Y Panis (2004) ArticleTitleSurgical management for slow-transit constipation [in French] Ann Chir 129 400–404 Occurrence Handle15388366 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.anchir.2004.07.003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvns1WgsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L Zorcolo L Covotta DC Bartolo (2005) ArticleTitleOutcome of anterior sphincter repair for obstetric injury: comparison of early and late results Dis Colon Rectum 48 524–531 Occurrence Handle15747083 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0770-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C Muller O Belyaev T Deska et al. (2005) ArticleTitleFecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options Langenbecks Arch Surg 390 544–552 Occurrence Handle16096762 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00423-005-0566-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. GI Barisic ZV Krivokapic VA Markovic MA Popovic (2006) ArticleTitleOutcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months Int J Colorectal Dis 21 52–56 Occurrence Handle15830204 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00384-004-0737-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PS Malone PG Ransley EM Kiely (1990) ArticleTitlePreliminary report: the antegrade continence enema Lancet 336 1217–1218 Occurrence Handle1978072 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(90)92834-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D2c7jt1Q%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MJ Rongen AG Hoop Particlevan der CG Baeten (2001) ArticleTitleCecal access for antegrade colon enemas in medically refractory slow-transit constipation: a prospective study Dis Colon Rectum 44 1644–1649 Occurrence Handle11711737 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234385 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmsFKgsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J Marshall JM Hutson N Anticich MP Stanton (2001) ArticleTitleAntegrade continence enemas in the treatment of slow-transit constipation J Pediatr Surg 36 1227–1230 Occurrence Handle11479862 Occurrence Handle10.1053/jpsu.2001.25768 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjtFyntA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. NP Lees P Hodson J Hill et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLong-term results of the antegrade continent enema procedure for constipation in adults Colorectal Dis 6 362–368 Occurrence Handle15335371 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00669.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvjtVGrtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M Lukac Z Krstic S Sindjic S Perovic (2004) ArticleTitleContinent appendicostomy in the treatment of fecal incontinence Acta Chir Iugosl 51 139–140 Occurrence Handle15771306 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7jvFersg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.2298/ACI0402139L

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K Krogh S Laurberg (1998) ArticleTitleMalone antegrade continence enema for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults Br J Surg 85 974–977 Occurrence Handle9692576 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00772.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czlsFejtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. GR Hirst PJ Arumugam AJ Watkins et al. (2005) ArticleTitleAntegrade continence enema in the treatment of obstructed defaecation with or without faecal incontinence Tech Coloproctol 9 217–221 Occurrence Handle16328126 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10151-005-0230-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnmtVOgsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P Christensen S Buntzen K Krogh S Laurberg (2001) ArticleTitleIleal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic irrigation Br J Surg 88 1637–1638 Occurrence Handle11736978 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01959.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnptVGmtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Poirier M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Poirier, M., Abcarian, H. & Nelson, R. Malone Antegrade Continent Enema: An Alternative to Resection in Severe Defecation Disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 22–28 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0732-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0732-x

Key words

Navigation