Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic and Open Anterior Resection for Upper and Mid Rectal Cancer: An Evaluation of Outcomes

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic anterior resection with open operation for mid and upper rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 265 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open anterior resection for cancer of the mid and upper rectum from June 2000 to December 2004 were included. Data about the patients’ demographics, operative details, postoperative outcome, and disease status were collected prospectively. Comparison of the outcome between laparoscopic and open resection was performed.

Results

The median age of the 265 patients was 69 (range, 27–91) years, and laparoscopic anterior resection was performed in 98 patients (37 percent). There was no difference in the age, gender, comorbidities, and level of tumor between the two groups. The operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group (200 vs. 127 minutes; P < 0.01), but the blood loss was less (200 vs. 250 ml; P = 0.027). The overall operative mortality was 1.8 percent, and the complication rate was 27.9 percent. Significantly more patients with early diseases (Stage I and Stage II) were operated with laparoscopic approach. There was no difference in the mortality or morbidity between the two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in five patients with open resection and one with laparoscopic resection (P = 0.418). Patients with laparoscopic resection had an earlier return of bowel function and earlier resumption of diet as well as a shorter median hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days; P < 0.001). With the median follow-up of the surviving patients for 21.2 months, the three-year local recurrence rates for those with open and laparoscopic resection were 4.9 and 3.3 percent, respectively (P = 0.513). In patients with Stage I and Stage II disease, the three-year cancer-specific survivals for open and laparoscopic resection were 89.8 and 88.6 percent, respectively (P = 0.882), whereas those of patients with Stage III disease were 65.6 and 55.5 percent, respectively (P = 0.911).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic anterior resection for mid and proximal rectal cancer is a safe option with short-term advantages compared with open operation. The oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection were not compromised, with similar local recurrence rate and the cancer-specific survival rate as patients who underwent open resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas JM Pique et al. (1995) ArticleTitleShort-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for colon cancer Surg Endosc 9 1101–1105 Occurrence Handle8553212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287hvVWjsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. JW Milsom B Bohm KA Hammerhofer V Fazio E Steiger P Elson (1998) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report J Am Coll Surg 187 46–54 Occurrence Handle9660024 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czitFClsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JG Stage S Schulze P Moller et al. (1997) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma Br J Surg 84 391–396 Occurrence Handle9117320 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jt1Wguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800840339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. AE Chapman MD Levitt P Hewett R Woods H Sheiner GJ Maddern (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review Ann Surg 234 590–606 Occurrence Handle11685021 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnmvFChsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200111000-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. TM Young-Fadok K Hall Long EJ McConnell RG Gomez RL Cabanela (2001) ArticleTitleAdvantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs Surg Endosc 15 450–454 Occurrence Handle11353959 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mtl2gsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. SD Wexner ID Moscovitz (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s disease Surg Clin North Am 80 1299–1319 Occurrence Handle10987037 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmtVOitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70226-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C Smadja IM Sbai M Tahrat et al. (1999) ArticleTitleElective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Results of a prospective study Surg Endosc 13 645–648 Occurrence Handle10384067 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzhs1eruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G Shore QH Gonzalez A Bondora SM Vickers (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs. conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn disease Arch Surg 138 76–79 Occurrence Handle12511156 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.1.76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Dwivedi F Chahin S Agrawal et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease Dis Colon Rectum 45 1309–1314 Occurrence Handle12394427 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6415-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial Lancet 359 2224–2229 Occurrence Handle12103285 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. InstitutionalAuthorNameClinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) ArticleTitleA comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050–2059 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa032651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. KL Leung SP Kwok SC Lam et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial Lancet 363 1187–1192 Occurrence Handle15081650 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. JE Hartley BJ Mehigan AE Qureshi GS Duthie PW Lee JR Monson (2001) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach Dis Colon Rectum 44 315–321 Occurrence Handle11289275 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7pvFyktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J Leroy F Jamali L Forbes et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes Surg Endosc 18 281–289 Occurrence Handle14691716 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7kvFeluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8877-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M Morino U Parini G Giraudo M Salval CR Brachet C Garrone (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients Ann Surg 237 335–342 Occurrence Handle12616116 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200303000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. WI Law KW Chu JW Ho CW Chan (2000) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision Am J Surg 179 92–96 Occurrence Handle10773140 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhs1Cktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00252-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. WL Law KW Chu HM Tung (2004) ArticleTitleEarly outcomes of 100 patients with laparoscopic resection for rectal neoplasm Surg Endosc 18 1592–1596 Occurrence Handle15931488 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrmtV2hsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-003-9249-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. WL Law KW Chu (2004) ArticleTitleAnterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients Ann Surg 240 260–268 Occurrence Handle15273550 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000133185.23514.32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. RJ Heald BJ Moran RD Ryall R Sexton JK MacFarlane (1998) ArticleTitleRectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997 Arch Surg 133 894–899 Occurrence Handle9711965 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cznsFOrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. G Arbman E Nilsson O Hallbook R Sjodahl (1996) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 83 375–379 Occurrence Handle8665198 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283ks1altQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. WE Enker N Merchant AM Cohen et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681consecutive cases from a specialty service Ann Surg 230 544–552 Occurrence Handle10522724 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvltVGmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199910000-00010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. WL Law KW Chu (2002) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence following total mesorectal excision with double-stapling anastomosis for rectal cancers: analysis of risk factors World J Surg 26 1272–1276 Occurrence Handle12205546 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-002-6560-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. JW Milsom B Bohm C Decanini VW Fazio (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model Surg Endosc 8 1117–1123 Occurrence Handle7992190 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FosVejuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00705735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. JW Fleshman SD Wexner M Anvari et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 930–939 Occurrence Handle10411441 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzjslanug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. F Kockerling H Scheidbach C Schneider et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group Dis Colon Rectum 43 1503–1511 Occurrence Handle11089583 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fkt1Gjtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. WE Enker (1997) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision–the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer Ann Med 29 127–133 Occurrence Handle9187227 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szjtVOqsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. F Feliciotti M Guerrieri AM Paganini et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients Surg Endosc 17 1530–1535 Occurrence Handle12874687 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3sngs1Oiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. W Schwenk B Bohm C Witt T Junghans K Grundel JM Muller (1999) ArticleTitlePulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection: a randomized controlled evaluation Arch Surg 134 6–12 Occurrence Handle9927122 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isVeisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.1.6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. ND Karanjia AP Corder P Bearn RJ Heald (1994) ArticleTitleLeakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 81 1224–1226 Occurrence Handle7953369 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FktFWltg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Wai Lun Law M.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.), Yee Man Lee M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.), Hok Kwok Choi M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.), Chi Leung Seto M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.) & Judy W. C. Ho M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.), F.C.R.S.(Engl.)

Authors
  1. Wai Lun Law M.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yee Man Lee M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hok Kwok Choi M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chi Leung Seto M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Judy W. C. Ho M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.), F.C.R.S.(Engl.)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai Lun Law M.S., F.R.C.S.(Edinb.).

About this article

Cite this article

Law, W.L., Lee, Y.M., Choi, H.K. et al. Laparoscopic and Open Anterior Resection for Upper and Mid Rectal Cancer: An Evaluation of Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 1108–1115 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0

Key words

Search

Navigation