Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative Anal Manometry Predicts Continence After Perineal Proctectomy for Rectal Prolapse

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study examines whether preoperative anal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency predict functional outcome after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.

Methods

All adult patients treated by perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse from 1995 to 2004 were identified (N = 106). Forty-five patients underwent anal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing before proctectomy and they form the basis for this study.

Results

Perineal proctectomy with levatoroplasty (anterior 88.9 percent; posterior 75.6 percent) was performed in all patients, with a mean resection length of 10.4 cm. Four patients (8.9 percent) developed recurrent prolapse during a 44-month mean follow-up. Preoperative resting and maximal squeeze pressures were 34.2 ± 18.3 and 60.4 ± 30.5 mmHg, respectively. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing was prolonged or undetectable in 55.6 percent of patients. Grade 2 or 3 fecal incontinence was reported by 77.8 percent of patients before surgery, and one-third had obstructed defecation. The overall prevalence of incontinence (77.8 vs. 35.6 percent, P < 0.0001) and constipation (33.3 vs. 6.7 percent, P = 0.003) decreased significantly after proctectomy. Patients with preoperative squeeze pressures >60 mmHg (n = 19) had improved postoperative fecal continence relative to those with lower pressures (incontinence rate, 10 vs. 54 percent; P = 0.004), despite having similar degrees of preoperative incontinence. Abnormalities of pudendal nerve function and mean resting pressures were not predictive of postoperative incontinence.

Conclusions

Perineal proctectomy provides relief from rectal prolapse, with good intermediate term results. Preoperative anal manometry can predict fecal continence rates after proctectomy, because patients with maximal squeeze pressures >60 mmHg have significantly improved outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RD Madoff A Mellgren (1999) ArticleTitleOne hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery Dis Colon Rectum 42 441–450 Occurrence Handle10215042 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ivFyrsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. EH Birnbaum L Stamm JF Rafferty RD Fry IJ Kodner JW Fleshman (1996) ArticleTitlePudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 39 1215–1221 Occurrence Handle8918427 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2snhtFQ%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. OB Johansen SD Wexner N Daniel JJ Nogueras DG Jagelman (1993) ArticleTitlePerineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly Dis Colon Rectum 36 767–772 Occurrence Handle8348868 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA2M7lt1A%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02048369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. AP Sainio PE Voutilainen AI Husa (1991) ArticleTitleRecovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: cause of improved continence? Dis Colon Rectum 34 816–821 Occurrence Handle1914749 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D3cnpvFU%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02051077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K Yoshioka G Hyland MR Keighley (1989) ArticleTitleAnorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence Br J Surg 76 64–68 Occurrence Handle2917261 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC3srksFM%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. I Schultz A Mellgren BY Nilsson A Dolk B Holmstrom (1998) ArticleTitlePreoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy Dis Colon Rectum 41 1392–1398 Occurrence Handle9823805 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FjvFCisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. JG Williams WD Wong L Jensen DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg (1991) ArticleTitleIncontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study Dis Colon Rectum 34 209–216 Occurrence Handle1999126 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2Mzhtl0%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02090159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A Tsunoda N Yasuda N Yokoyama G Kamiyama M Kusano (2003) ArticleTitleDelorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis Dis Colon Rectum 46 1260–1265 Occurrence Handle12972972 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6724-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. K Azimuddin IT Khubchandani L Rosen JJ Stasik RD Riether JF Reed (2001) ArticleTitleRectal prolapse: a search for the “best” operation Am Surg 67 622–627 Occurrence Handle11450773 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzpvFygtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. AJ Brown JH Anderson RF McKee IG Finlay (2004) ArticleTitleStrategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria Dis Colon Rectum 47 103–107 Occurrence Handle14702646 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FitV2isw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-003-0013-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MH Kimmins BK Evetts J Isler R Billingham (2001) ArticleTitleThe Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 44 565–570 Occurrence Handle11330584 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jvVGnsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. JG Williams DA Rothenberger RD Madoff SM Goldberg (1992) ArticleTitleTreatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy Dis Colon Rectum 35 830–834 Occurrence Handle1511640 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A1c%2FhtFM%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02047867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ML Prasad RK Pearl H Abcarian CP Orsay RL Nelson (1986) ArticleTitlePerineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 29 547–552 Occurrence Handle3743295 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimA3c%2Fgt1c%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. RE Karulf RD Madoff SM Goldberg (2001) ArticleTitleRectal prolapse Curr Probl Surg 38 771–832 Occurrence Handle11593231 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrks1SrsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. AM Metcalf V Loening-Baucke (1988) ArticleTitleAnorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse Am J Surg 155 206–210 Occurrence Handle3341544 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC3s7ltFw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DS Kim CB Tsang WD Wong AC Lowry SM Goldberg RD Madoff (1999) ArticleTitleComplete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results Dis Colon Rectum 42 460–466 Occurrence Handle10215045 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ivFyrtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02234167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. LS Dvorkin CL Chan CH Knowles NS Williams PJ Lunniss SM Scott (2004) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse Dis Colon Rectum 47 198–203 Occurrence Handle15043290 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-003-0035-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. K Yoshioka G Hyland MR Keighley (1988) ArticleTitlePhysiological changes after postanal repair and parameters predicting outcome Br J Surg 75 1220–1224 Occurrence Handle3233474 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC28jlsFQ%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Sean C. Glasgow M.D., Elisa H. Birnbaum M.D., Ira J. Kodner M.D., James W. Fleshman M.D. & David W. Dietz M.D.

  2. Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA

    David W. Dietz M.D.

Authors
  1. Sean C. Glasgow M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisa H. Birnbaum M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ira J. Kodner M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James W. Fleshman M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David W. Dietz M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Dietz M.D..

Additional information

Supported exclusively using institutional funding.

About this article

Cite this article

Glasgow, S.C., Birnbaum, E.H., Kodner, I.J. et al. Preoperative Anal Manometry Predicts Continence After Perineal Proctectomy for Rectal Prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 1052–1058 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0538-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0538-x

Key words

Search

Navigation