Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The results and complications of perineal rectosigmoidectomy for complete rectal prolapse in 114 patients have been reviewed. Most patients were elderly and high risk by virtue of other concurrent medical conditions. Fourteen patients (12 percent) developed significant postoperative complications. Hospital stay was short (median, four days). Ten patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 104 patients were followed for 3 to 90 months. Eleven patients (10 percent) developed recurrent fullthickness rectal prolapse; six of them underwent repeat perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Sixty-seven patients had fecal incontinence prior to surgery. Eleven patients underwent concomitant levatoroplasty; 10 of them either improved or regained full continence of feces postoperatively. Twenty-six of the 56 patients who underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy alone improved or regained full continence. Rectal prolapse can be successfully treated by perineal rectosigmoidectomy in elderly, highrisk patients with minimal morbidity. Levatoroplasty dramatically improves fecal incontinence occurring in association with rectal prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes ES. Discussion on rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1949;42:1007–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Porter N. Collective results of operations for rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1962;55:1087–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermeulen FD, Nivatvongs S, Fang DT,et al. A technique for perineal rectosigmoidectomy using autosuture devices. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A. Results of Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:845–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Ripstein procedure. Lahey Clinic experience 1968–1985. Arch Surg 1988;123:554–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keighley MR, Fielding JA, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson JR, Wilson BG, Parks TG. Complete rectal prolapse—the results of Ivalon sponge rectopexy. Postgrad Med J 1984;60:411–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG,et al. The management of procidentia: 30 years experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:96–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Altemeier WA, Cuthbertson WR, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years' experience with the onestage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1971;173:993–1001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopal KA, Amshel AL, Shonberg IL, Eftaiha M. Rectal procidentia in elderly and debilitated patients. Experience with the Altemeier procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:376–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H,et al. Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:547–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramanujam PS, Venkatesh KS. Perineal excision of rectal prolapse with posterior levator repair in elderly high-risk patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:704–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham W, Clegg JF, Taylor V. Complete rectal prolapse; repair by a simple technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1984;66:87–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyers JO, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse in males—implications for management (abstr). Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:P28.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams JG, Wong WD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:209–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gundersen AL, Cogbill TH, Landercasper J. Reappraisal of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:721–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Monson JR, Jones NA, Vowden P, Brennan TG. Delorme's operation: the first choice in complete rectal prolapse? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1986;68:143–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uhlig BE, Sullivan ES. The modified Delorme operation: its place in surgical treatment for massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:513–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lomas MI, Cooperman H. Correction of rectal procidentia by use of polypropylene mesh (Marlex). Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:416–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jackaman FR, Francis JN, Hopkinson BR. Silicone rubber band treatment of rectal prolapse. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1980;62:386–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Earnshaw JJ, Hopkinson BR. Late results of silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:86–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, May 12 to 17, 1991.

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, J.G., Rothenberger, D.A., Madoff, R.D. et al. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 830–834 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047867

Keywords

Navigation