Abstract
PURPOSE: Perineal pressure ulcers are a common and devastating complication for paralyzed or chronically bedridden patients. Controversy exists on the benefit of fecal diversion for the treatment and prevention of these ulcers. This study compared outcomes in bed-bound patients with pressure ulcers who electively underwent fecal diversion with those who did not. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all disabled patients who underwent surgery for medically intractable pressure ulcer from 1993 to 2001. Charts were divided into the colostomy group or noncolostomy group. Recurrence rates, healing times, morbidity and mortality, and number of reoperations were calculated for each group. Additionally, stoma patients were interviewed for quality of life assessment. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were treated during the study period (colostomy, n = 41; noncolostomy, n = 26). The majority of colostomies were performed laparoscopically, with a 9.7 percent incidence of postoperative complications. The ulcer recurrence rate was lower in the treated colostomy group (43 percent) compared with the noncolostomy group (69 percent; P < 0.05). In addition, noncolostomy patients had longer healing times (7 vs. 3 months; P < 0.05), and this group required more ulcer operations than the stoma patients did. Quality of life and bowel care were much improved by the colostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Stoma construction is a safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality that helps heal pressure ulcers and decreases the incidence of recurrence. Additionally, laparoscopic stoma construction represents a technical advance that may reduce operative complications that have been previously reported with open fecal diversion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
RJ Saltzstein J Romano (1990) ArticleTitleThe efficacy of colostomy as a bowel management alternative in selected spinal cord injury patients J Am Paraplegia Soc 13 9–13
JH Frisbie CG Tun CH Nguyen (1986) ArticleTitleEffect of enterostomy on quality of life in spinal cord injury patients J Am Paraplegia Soc 9 3–5
SR Kelly M Shashidharan B Borwell AM Tromans D Finnis DJ Grundy (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of intestinal stoma in patients with spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 37 211–214
GR Deshmukh DC Barkel D Sevo P Hergenroeder (1996) ArticleTitleUse or misuse of colostomy to heal pressure ulcers Dis Colon Rectum 39 737–738
P Wara K Sorensen V Berg (1981) ArticleTitleProximal fecal diversion Dis Colon Rectum 24 114–119
JA Porter EP Salvati RJ Rubin TE Eisenstat (1989) ArticleTitleComplications of colostomies Dis Colon Rectum 32 299–303
JM Stone VA Wolfe M Nino-Murcia I Perkash (1990) ArticleTitleColostomy as treatment for complications of spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71 514–518
AC Lynch C Wong A Anthony BR Dobbs FA Frizelle (2000) ArticleTitleBowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 38 717–723
JG Banwell GH Creasey AM Aggarwal JT Mortimer (1993) ArticleTitleManagement of the neurogenic bowel in patients with spinal cord injury Uro Clin North Am 20 517–526
S Glickman MA Kamm (1996) ArticleTitleBowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients Lancet 347 1651–1653
WE Longo GH Ballantyne IM Modlin (1989) ArticleTitleThe colon, anorectum, and spinal cord patient Dis Colon Rectum 32 261–267
ML Craven J Etchells (1998) ArticleTitleA review of the outcome of stoma surgery on spinal cord injured patients J Advan Nursing 27 922–926
RM Allman (1997) ArticleTitlePressure ulcer prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and impact Clin Geriatr Med 13 421–436
RM Allman (1995) ArticleTitleOutcomes in prospective studies and clinical trials Advan Wound Care 8 61–64
GR Evans CR Dufresne PN Manson (1994) ArticleTitleSurgical correction of pressure ulcers in an urban center Advan Wound Care 7 40–46
O Schwandner TH Schideck HP Bruch (1998) ArticleTitleStoma creation for fecal diversion Int J Colorect Dis 13 251–255
HK Lyerly JR Mault (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic ileostomy and colostomy Ann Surg 219 317–322
GM Fuhrman DM Ota (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic intestinal stomas Dis Colon Rectum 37 444–449
KA Ludwig JW Milsom A Garcia-Ruiz VW Fazio (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic techniques for fecal diversion Dis Colon Rectum 39 285–288
KA Ludwig JW Milsom JM Church VW Fazio (1996) ArticleTitlePreliminary experience with laparoscopic intestinal surgery for Crohn’s disease Am J Surg 17 52–55
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
de la Fuente, S.G., Levin, L.S., Reynolds, J.D. et al. Elective Stoma Construction Improves Outcomes in Medically Intractable Pressure Ulcers. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 1525–1530 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6808-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6808-6