Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Sexual and Voiding Function After Total Mesorectal Excision With Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation in Males With Rectal Cancer

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation has been reported to be an optimal surgery for rectal cancer. It minimizes local recurrence and sexual and urinary dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in terms of voiding and sexual function in males with rectal cancer. METHODS: We performed urine flowmetry using Urodyn® and a standard questionnaire using the International Index of Erectile Function and the International Prostate Symptom Score before and after surgery in 68 males with rectal cancer. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean maximal urinary flow rate and voided volume were seen before and after surgery (18.9 ± 5.7 vs. 13.7 ± 7.0, 240 ± 91.9 vs. 143 ± 78; P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively), but no differences in residual volume before and after surgery were apparent (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 8.1 ± 4.4; P > 0.05). The total International Prostate Symptom Score was increased after surgery from 6.2 ± 5.8 to 9.8 ± 5.9 (P < 0.05). There were no changes of score for one of each of seven International Prostate Symptom Score items in 49 patients (73.5 percent) to 61 patients (89.7 percent). Five International Index of Erectile Function domain scores (erectile function, intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, sexual desire, and overall satisfaction) were significantly decreased after surgery (18.2 ± 9.3 vs. 13.5 ± 9, 8.4 ± 4.2 vs. 4.4 ± 2.9, 5.8 ± 2.9 vs. 4.4 ± 2.9, 6.1 ± 2.4 vs. 4.8 ± 2, 6.1 ± 2.2 vs. 4.5 ± 2.3, respectively; P < 0.05). Erection was possible in 55 patients (80.9 percent); penetration ability was possible in 51 patients (75 percent). Complete inability for erection and intercourse was observed in three patients (5.5 percent). Retrograde ejaculation was noted in 9 patients (13.2 percent). International Index of Erectile Function domains such as sexual desire and overall satisfaction were greatly decreased in 39 patients (57.4 percent) and 43 patients (63.2 percent), respectively. Multiple regression analysis of factors affecting postoperative sexual dysfunction showed that age older than 60 years (sexual desire, P = 0.019), within six months (erectile function, P = 0.04; intercourse satisfaction, P = 0.011; orgasmic function, P = 0.03), lower rectal cancer (erectile function, P = 0.02; intercourse satisfaction, P = 0.036; orgasmic function, P = 0.027) were significant factors adversely affecting sexual function. CONCLUSION: Total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation showed relative safety in preserving sexual and voiding function. The International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires were useful in assessing urinary and sexual function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ML Santangelo G Romano C Sassaroli (1987) ArticleTitleSexual functions after resection for rectal cancer Am J Surg 154 502–504 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD2cjitF0%3D Occurrence Handle3674298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. VW Fazio J Fletcher D Montague (1980) ArticleTitleProspective study of the effect of resection of the rectum on male sexual function World J Surg 4 149–152 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BB287islE%3D Occurrence Handle7190753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G LaMonica RA Audisio M Tamburini A Filiberti V Ventafridda (1985) ArticleTitleIncidence of sexual dysfunction in male patients treated surgically for rectal malignancy Dis Colon Rectum 28 937–940 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD2MrhvVU%3D Occurrence Handle4064853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K Sugihara Y Moriya T Akasu S Fujita (1996) ArticleTitlePelvic autonomic nerve preservation for patients with rectal carcinoma Cancer 78 1871–1880 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD28rot1A%3D Occurrence Handle8909305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AR Mundy (1982) ArticleTitleAn anatomical explanation for bladder dysfunction following rectal and uterine surgery Br J Urol 54 501–504 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyD2snhslI%3D Occurrence Handle7171956

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ES Zinreich LR Derogatis J Herpst G Auvil S Piantadosi SE Order (1990) ArticleTitlePre and post-treatment evaluation of sexual function in patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19 729–732 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D3cfltV0%3D Occurrence Handle2211222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RJ Heald RD Ryall (1986) ArticleTitleRecurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Lancet 1 1479–1482 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimB2Mros1w%3D Occurrence Handle2425199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Y Moriya K Hojo T Sawada Y Koyama (1989) ArticleTitleSignificance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection Dis Colon Rectum 32 307–315 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC2s%2FgsFM%3D Occurrence Handle2784376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. RJ Heald (1995) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer Br J Surg 82 1297–1299 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD1MjotVw%3D Occurrence Handle7489148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. WE Enker (1995) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of rectal cancer J Am Coll Surg 181 335–346 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD3cfkslU%3D Occurrence Handle7551328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. HR Choi WS Chung BS Shim et al. (1996) ArticleTitleTranslation validity and reliability of I-PSS Korean version Korean J Urol 37 659–665

    Google Scholar 

  12. RC Rosen A Riley G Wagner IH Osterloh J Kirkpatrick A Mishra (1997) ArticleTitleThe International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Urology 49 822–830 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3s7jsFc%3D Occurrence Handle9187685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DE Neal NS Williams D Johnston (1981) ArticleTitleA prospective study of bladder function before and after sphincter-saving resections for low carcinoma of the rectum Br J Urol 53 558–564 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2D1M3lsFM%3D Occurrence Handle7317742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. TC Gerstenberg ML Nielsen S Clausen J Blaabjerg J Lindenberg (1980) ArticleTitleBladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer. Urodynamic investigation before and after operative in a consecutive series Ann Surg 191 81–86 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BC3cfislU%3D Occurrence Handle7352782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. VB Astler FA Coller (1954) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum Ann Surg 139 846–852 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CyuD2sbhtlU%3D Occurrence Handle13159135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. P Kirkegaard A Hjortrup S Sanders (1981) ArticleTitleBladder dysfunction after low anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer Am J Surg 141 266–268 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C3cjhsF0%3D Occurrence Handle7457746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. K Hojo T Sawada Y Moriya (1989) ArticleTitleAn analysis of survival and voiding, sexual function after wide iliopelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the rectum, compared with conventional lymphadenectomy Dis Colon Rectum 32 128–133 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC38%2FksF0%3D Occurrence Handle2914526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. K Havenga WE Enker K McDermott AM Cohen BD Minsky J Guillem (1996) ArticleTitleMale and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum J Am Coll Surg 182 495–502 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2c3ht1w%3D Occurrence Handle8646349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A Nesbakken K Nygaard E Bull-Njaa E Carlsen LM Eri (2000) ArticleTitleBladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 87 206–210 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01357.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jslynug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10671929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. KY Lee SM Kim NK Kim JK Park SK Sohn JS Min (2001) ArticleTitlePattern of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer J Korean Surg Soc 61 581–585

    Google Scholar 

  21. K Havenga CP Maas MC DeRuiter K Welvaart JB Trimbos (2000) ArticleTitleAvoiding long-term disturbance to bladder and sexual function in pelvic surgery, particularly with rectal cancer Semin Surg Oncol 18 235–243 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(200004/05)18:3<235::AID-SSU7>3.0.CO;2-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3itFKhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10757889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. K Havenga MC DeRuiter WE Enker K Welvaart (1996) ArticleTitleAnatomical basis of autonomic nerve preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Br J Surg 83 384–388 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2cnislQ%3D Occurrence Handle8665201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, N.K., Aahn, T.W., Park, J.K. et al. Assessment of Sexual and Voiding Function After Total Mesorectal Excision With Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation in Males With Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 1178–1185 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6388-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6388-5

Keywords

Navigation