Abstract
Debris flow generated by landslides due to intense rainfall can cause extensive damage to residential areas. To predict and prevent the severity of such damage, several numerical models have been developed. However, there are limited studies regarding the entrainment and erosion effect of debris flow. This research aims to analyze several erosion–entrainment models for the selection of erosion–entrainment models in debris-flow analysis. The study focuses on landslides that occurred in the Raemian and Sindonga apartment basins in Mt. Umyeon, Republic of Korea, on July 27, 2011. The impact area, entrainment volume, maximum velocity, inundated depth, and erosion shape resulting from the debris-flow modeling were compared with field data. The simulation results of each erosion–entrainment model were assessed through the receiver operating characteristic method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham MT, Satyam N, Reddy SKP, Pradhan B (2021) Runout modeling and calibration of friction parameters of Kurichermala debris flow, India. Landslides 18:737–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01540-1
An H, Ichikawa Y, Tachikawa Y, Shiiba M (2012) Comparison between iteration schemes for three-dimensional coordinate-transformed saturated–unsaturated flow model. J Hydrol 470:212–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.056
An H, Kim M, Lee G, Kim Y, Lim H (2019) Estimation of the area of sediment deposition by debris flow using a physical-based modeling approach. Quat Int 503:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quainst.2018.09.049
Audusse E, Bouchut F, Bristeau M-O, Klein R, Perthame BT (2004) A Fast and Stable Well-Balanced Scheme with Hydrostatic Reconstruction for Shallow Water Flows. SIAM J Sci Comput 25:2050–2065. https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827503431090
Bartelt P, Buehler Y, Christen M, Deubelbeiss Y, Graf C, McArdell B (2013) RAMMS–rapid mass movement simulation, A modeling system for debris flows in research and practice, user manual v1. 5, debris flow, manuscript update: 31 January 2013. WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, available at: http://ramms.slf.ch/ramms/downloads/RAMMS_DBF_Manual.pdf (last access: 27 Feb 2015)
Bertolo P, Bottino G (2008) Debris-flow event in the Frangerello Stream-Susa Valley (Italy)—calibration of numerical models for the back analysis of the 16 October, 2000 rainstorm. Landslides 5:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0099-7
Bingham EC (1922) Fluidity and plasticity. McGraw Hill, New York, p 440
Cepeda J, Chávez JA, Martínez CC (2010) Procedure for the selection of runout model parameters from landslide back-analyses: application to the Metropolitan Area of San Salvador, El Salvador. Landslides 7:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0197-9
Cesca M, D’Agostino V (2008) Comparison between FLO-2D and RAMMS in debris-flow modelling: a case study in the Dolomites. WIT Trans Eng Sci 60:197–206. https://doi.org/10.2495/deb080201
Christen M, Kowalski J, Bartelt P (2010) RAMMS: Numerical simulation of dense snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain. Cold Reg Sci Technol 63:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.005
Coe JA, Kean JW, Godt JW, Baum RL, Jones ES, Gochis DJ, Anderson GS (2014) New insights into debris-flow hazards from an extraordinary event in the Colorado Front Range. GSA Today 24:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG214A.1
Dahl M-PJ, Gauer P, Kalsnes BG, Mortensen LE, Jensen NH, Veihe A (2013) Numerical runout simulation of debris avalanches in the Faroe Islands, North Atlantic Ocean. Landslides 10:623–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0355-3
Denlinger RP, Iverson RM (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. J Geophys Res 106:553–566. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900330
Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Let 27:861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
Frank F, McArdell BW, Huggel C, Vieli A (2015) The importance of entrainment and bulking on debris flow runout modeling: examples from the Swiss Alps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:2569–2583. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2569-2015
Godt JW, Baum RL, Savage WZ, Salciarini D, Schulz WH, Harp EL (2008) Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: Requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework. Eng Geol 102:214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.019
Hong M, Jeong S, Kim J (2020) A combined method for modeling the triggering and propagation of debris flows. Landslides 17:805–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01294-5
Hussin HY, Quan Luna B, Van Westen CJ, Christen M, Malet J-P, Van Asch TWJ (2012) Parameterization of a numerical 2-D debris flow model with entrainment: a case study of the Faucon catchment, Southern French Alps. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:3075–3090. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3075-2012
Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296. https://doi.org/10.1029/97rg00426
Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb Mixture Theory J Geophys Res 106:537–552. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900329
Jakob M, Bovis M, Oden M (2005) The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris-flow magnitude and frequency. Earth Surf Process Landf 30:755–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1188
Johnson AM, Rodine JR (1984) Debris flow: slope instability, edited by Brunsden D and Prior DB. Wiley 257–361
Kean JW, Staley DM, Cannon SH (2011) In situ measurements of post-fire debris flows in southern California: Comparisons of the timing and magnitude of 24 debris-flow events with rainfall and soil moisture conditions. J Geophys Res 116:F04019. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jf002005
Lai J, Wang G, Wang Z, Chen J, Pang X, Wang S, Zhou Z, He Z, Qin Z, Fan X (2018) A review on pore structure characterization in tight sandstones. Earth Sci Rev 177:436–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.003
Lee S, An H, Kim M, Lim H (2020) Analysis of debris flow simulation parameters with entrainment effect: a case study in the Mt. Umyeon J Korea Water Resour Assoc 53:637–646. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2020.53.9.637
Liu W, He S (2020) Comprehensive modelling of runoff-generated debris flow from formation to propagation in a catchment. Landslides 17:1529–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01383-w
McDougall S, Hungr O (2005) Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Can Geotech J 42:1437–1448. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-064
Medina V, Hürlimann M, Bateman A (2008) Application of FLATModel, a 2D finite volume code, to debris flows in the northeastern part of the Iberian Peninsula. Landslides 5:127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0102-3
Mergili M, Jaboyedoff M, Pullarello J, Pudasaini SP (2020a) Back calculation of the 2017 Piz Cengalo-Bondo landslide cascade with r.avaflow: what we can do and what we can learn. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 20:505–520. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-505-2020
Mergili M, Pudasaini SP, Emmer A, Fischer JT, Cochachin A, Frey H (2020b) Reconstruction of the 1941 GLOF process chain at Lake Palcacocha (Cordillera Blanca, Peru). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 24:93–114. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-93-2020
Morgenstern NR (1978) Mobile soil and rock flows. Lecture given at the fifth Southeast Asian Conference on soil engineering, Bangkok, July 1977. Geotech Eng 9(2):123–141
Naef D, Rickenmann D, Rutschmann P, McArdell BW (2006) Comparison of flow resistance relations for debris flows using a one-dimensional finite element simulation model. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:155–165. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-155-2006
Pirulli M (2010) On the use of the calibration-based approach for debris-flow forward-analyses. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1009-2010
Pirulli M, Sorbino G (2008) Assessing potential debris flow runout: a comparison of two simulation models. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:961–971. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-961-2008
Pitman EB, Patra A, Bauer A, Sheridan M, Bursik M (2003) Computing debris flows and landslides. Phys Fluids 15:3638–3646
Pudasaini SP (2012) A general two-phase debris flow model. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 117:F03010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002186
Pudasaini SP, Mergili M (2019) A multi-phase mass flow model. J Geophys Res 124:2920–2942. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005204
Pudasaini SP, Fischer JT (2020) A mechanical erosion model for two-phase mass flows. Int J Multiph Flows 132:103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103416
Pudasaini SP, Krautblatter M (2021) The mechanics of landslide mobility with erosion. Nat Commun 12:6793. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26959-5
Pudasaini SP, Wang Y, Hutter K (2005) Modelling debris flows down general channels. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:799–819. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-799-2005
Remaître A, Malet J-P, Maquaire O (2005) Morphology and sedimentology of a complex debris flow in a clay-shale basin. Earth Surf Process Landf 30:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1161
Rickenmann D, Laigle D, McArdell BW, Hübl J (2006) Comparison of 2D debris-flow simulation models with field events. Comput Geosci 10:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9021-3
Scaringi G, Fan X, Xu Q, Liu C, Ouyang C, Domènech G, Yang F, Dai L (2018) Some considerations on the use of numerical methods to simulate past landslides and possible new failures: the case of the recent Xinmo landslide (Sichuan, China). Landslides 15:1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0953-9
Seoul City (2014) Research contract report: Addition and Complement causes survey of Mt, vol. 2011 Woomyeon landslide (In Korean)
Shugar DH, Jacquemart M, Shean D et al (2021) A massive rock and ice avalanche caused the 2021 disaster at Chamoli. Indian Himalaya Sci 373(6552):300–306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh4455
Sovilla B, Burlando P, Bartelt P (2006) Field experiments and numerical modeling of mass entrainment in snow avalanches. J Geophys Res 111:F03007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000391
Stock J, Dietrich WE (2003) Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature. Water Resour Res 39:1089. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr001057
Takahashi T (2007) Debris flow: mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. Taylor and Francis, New York
Takahashi T, Nakagawa H (1991) Prediction of stony debris flow induced by severe rainfall. J Jpn Soc Eros Control Eng 44:12–19. https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo1973.44.3_12
Voellmy A (1955) Über die Zerstörungskraft von Lawinen. Schweiz Bauztg 73:212–285
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. (No. 2018-Tech-19) and the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (Project code: 22-3412-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S., An, H., Kim, M. et al. Evaluation of different erosion–entrainment models in debris-flow simulation. Landslides 19, 2075–2090 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01901-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01901-y