Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of artificial barriers on the propagation of debris avalanches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper deals with the effects of artificial barriers on the dynamic features of unconfined flows such as debris avalanches in coarse-grained materials. These phenomena are often responsible for damage to structures and risk to human life. Artificial barriers could mitigate those threats by reducing the flow velocity and the runout distance as well as diverting the flow towards lateral zones constrained by the barriers. A quasi-3D SPH hydro-mechanically coupled model was used to simulate the propagation heights and velocities, the evolution of pore water pressures inside the flow and the entrainment of additional material from the ground surface during the propagation stage. The numerical simulations referred to (i) simple topography resembling typical in situ conditions and (ii) the case history of Nocera Inferiore (Southern Italy) where a destructive debris avalanche occurred in 2005. Different scenarios were analysed relative to the number, type and location of the artificial barriers. The numerical results highlight the variations in propagation pattern, velocity and deposition thickness of the flows, which may occur in presence of artificial barriers. Indications on favourable type and location of barriers are provided both for the simple topography and for the specific case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armanini A, Larcher M, Odorizzi M (2011) Dynamic impact of a debris flow front against a vertical wall. In proceedings of the 5th international conference on debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment, Padua, 1041–1049

  • Blanc, T., Pastor, M., Drempetic, M. S. V., & Haddad, B (2011) Depth integrated modelling of fast landslide propagation. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 15(sup1):51–72

  • Braun A, Cuomo S, Petrosino S, Wang X, Zhang L (2018) Numerical SPH analysis of debris flow run-out and related river damming scenarios for a local case study in SW China. Landslides 15(3):535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugnion L, McArdell BW, Bartelt P, Wendeler C (2012) Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles. Landslides 9(2):179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvetti F, di Prisco CG, Vairaktaris E (2017) DEM assessment of impact forces of dry granular masses on rigid barriers. Acta Geotech 12(1):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canelli L, Ferrero AM, Migliazza M, Segalini A (2012) Debris flow risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers-experimental tests and impact analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(5):1693–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Cuomo S, Della Sala M (2011a) Spatial and temporal occurrence of rainfall-induced shallow landslides of flow type: a case of Sarno-Quindici, Italy. Geomorphology 126(1–2):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Cuomo S, De Santis A (2011b) Numerical modelling of the December 1999 Cervinara flow-like mass movements (southern Italy). Proc. of 5th international conference on debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment. Ital J Eng Geol Environ, 635–644

  • Cascini L, Cuomo S, Pastor M, Sorbino G, Piciullo L (2014) SPH run-out modelling of channelised landslides of the flow type. Geomorphology 214:502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Cuomo S, Pastor M, Rendina I (2016) SPH-FDM propagation and pore water pressure modelling for debris flows in flume tests. Eng Geol 213:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini S, Cuomo S, Pastor M, Rendina, I (2018) Modelling of debris flows and flash floods propagation in storage basins of Italian Alps. Landslides (under review)

  • Ceccato F, Simonini P, di Prisco C, Redaelli I (2017) The effect of the front inclination on the impact forces transmitted by granular flows to rigid structures. In Workshop on world landslide forum, 593–599. Springer, Cham

  • Choi CE, Ng CWW, Au-Yeung SCH, Goodwin GR (2015) Froude characteristics of both dense granular and water flows in flume modelling. Landslides 12(6):1197–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo S, Pastor M, Cascini L, Castorino GC (2014) Interplay of rheology and entrainment in debris avalanches: a numerical study. Can Geotech J 51(11):1318–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo S, Pastor M, Capobianco V, Cascini L (2016) Modelling the space–time evolution of bed entrainment for flow-like landslides. Eng Geol 212:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuomo S, Cascini L, Pastor M, Petrosino S (2017) Modelling the propagation of debris avalanches in presence of obstacles. In workshop on world landslide forum (pp. 469-475). Springer, Cham

  • Gioffrè D, Mandaglio MC, di Prisco C, Moraci N (2017) Evaluation of rapid landslide impact forces against sheltering structures. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 3:79–91

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Bovis MJ, Hutchinson JN (2001) A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environ Eng Geosci 7(3):221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr, O., Leroueil, S., & Picarelli, L (2014). The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194

  • Hürlimann, M., McArdell, B. W., & Rickli, C (2015). Field and laboratory analysis of the runout characteristics of hillslope debris flows in Switzerland. Geomorphology 232:20–32

  • Kattel P, Kafle J, Fischer JT, Mergili M, Tuladhar BM, Pudasaini SP (2018) Interaction of two-phase debris flow with obstacles. Eng Geol 242:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan JSH, Koo RCH, Ng CWW (2015) Landslide mobility analysis for design of multiple debris-resisting barriers. Can Geotech J 52(9):1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuyama T (2008) Structural countermeasures for debris flow disasters. Int J Erosion Control Eng 1(2):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Song D, Kwan JHS, Koo RCH, Shiu HYK, Ho KKS (2015) Physical modeling of baffles influence on landslide debris mobility. Landslides 12(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., Blanc, T., Haddad, B., Petrone, S., Sanchez Morles, M. S., Drempetic, V., Issler, D., Crosta, G.B., Cascini, L., Sorbino, G., Cuomo, S (2014). Application of a SPH depth-integrated model to landslide run-out analysis. Landslides 11(5):793–812

  • Pastor M, Haddad B, Sorbino G, Cuomo S, Drempetic V (2009) A depth-integrated, coupled SPH model for flow-like landslides and related phenomena. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33(2):143–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor M, Quecedo M, FernÁndez Merodo JA, Herrores MI, GonzÁlez E, Mira P (2002) Modelling tailings dams and mine waste dumps failures. Géotechnique 52(8):579–591

  • Popescu, M. E., & Sasahara, K (2009). Engineering measures for landslide disaster mitigation. In Landslides–Disaster Risk Reduction (pp. 609–631). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Vagnon, F., & Segalini, A (2016). Debris flow impact estimation on a rigid barrier. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16(7):1691–1697

  • Wendeler C, Volkwein A, Denk M, Roth A, Wartmann S (2007) Field measurements used for numerical modelling of flexible debris flow barriers. In: Chen CL, Major JJ (eds) Proceedings of fourth international conference on debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment, 10–13 September 2007. Chengdu, China, pp 681–687

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Prof. Manuel Pastor (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain) and co-workers are much acknowledged for having provided the “GeoFlow_SPH” code used for the numerical simulations. We are grateful to Dr. Anika Braun (TU Berlin) for English proofreading. This research was developed within the framework of different projects (i) Industrial Partnership PhD Course (Dottorato Industriale Regione Campania, Italia); (ii) project FARB 2017 “Modellazione numerica e analisi inversa per frane tipo flusso” funded by the Italian Education and Research Ministry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical Engineering Group (GEG), University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Salerno, Fisciano, Italy

    Sabatino Cuomo

  2. Department of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, 80133, Naples, Italy

    Sabrina Moretti & Stefano Aversa

Authors
  1. Sabatino Cuomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sabrina Moretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefano Aversa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabatino Cuomo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cuomo, S., Moretti, S. & Aversa, S. Effects of artificial barriers on the propagation of debris avalanches. Landslides 16, 1077–1087 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01155-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01155-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation