Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sex effect on habitat selection in response to hunting disturbance: the study of wild boar

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial variation of the ‘predation risk’ due to human activities or distribution may increase the sexual difference in habitat selection. Indeed, females with offspring are usually more risk adverse than males. Based on a long-term wild boar study, we analysed the diurnal distribution of female and male wild boar before, during and after the hunting period. Hunting, food and foliation were investigated as factors affecting patterns of forest parcel selection. As expected, dense vegetative covers were selected during resting periods, but wild boar decreased this pattern of habitat selection in response to hunting disturbance. Moreover, the habitat selection of wild boar did not fit with the variation of food availability (presence or absence of mast) and the vegetation cycle. As expected, sows responded more to the hunting disturbance than males, leading to a more pronounced sexual difference during the riskier season. The unexpected decrease of bush use may be explained either by the increased hunting effort in this habitat or by the increased movements between resting sites due to disturbance, leading to a more random habitat selection pattern. The observed difference between sexes could result from a higher response of females with offspring to hunting, leading to an increased frequentation of secondary habitats, whereas males can tolerate more risks and remain hidden in thicket plots. Our results highlight how hunting disturbance can lead game species to change their patterns of refuge habitat selection and may affect the habitat segregation between the sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abaigar T, Del Barrio G, Vericad JR (1994) Habitat preference of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in a mediterranean environment. Indirect evaluation by signs. Mammalia 58:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radiotracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baubet E (1998) Biologie du sanglier en montagne: biodémographie, occupation de l'espace et régime alimentaire. Thèse de doctorat – UCBL I, 281 p

  • Baubet E, Brandt S, Touzeau C (1998) Effet de la chasse sur les stratégies d'occupation de l'espace des sangliers (Sus scrofa). Analyses préliminaires. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:655–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Baubet E, Vassant J, Brandt S et al. (2008) Connaissances sur la biologie du sanglier: Utilisation de l'espace et régime alimentaire. Colloque Sanglier de Rennes pp. 59–69

  • Boitani L, Mattei L, Nonis D, Corsi F (1994) Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. J Mammal 75:600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonenfant C, Loe LE, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC, Gaillard JM, Klein F (2004) Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger V, Baltzinger C, Saïd S, Ballon P, Picard JF, Dupouey JL (2009) Ranking temperate woody species along a gradient of browsing by deer. For Ecol Manage 258:1397–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C, Dufour AB (2006) Eigenanalysis of selection ratios from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 87:2349–2355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C, Maillard D, Vassant J, Brandt S (2002) Summer and hunting season home ranges of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in two habitats in France. Game Wildl Sci 19:281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessel D, Dufour AB, Thioulouse J (2004) The ade4 package - I: one-table methods. R News 4:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti P, Shackleton DM (2002) Relationship between predation-risk factors and sexual segregation in Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli dalli). Can J Zool 80:2108–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Differt J (2001) Phénologie des espèces arborées. Synthèse bibliographique. Analyse des données du Réseau National de Suivi à long terme des Ecosystèmes Forestiers (RENECOFOR- INRA)

  • Edgington ES (1987) Randomization tests. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 341

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Jedrzejewska B, Selva N, Zub K, Szymura L (2002) Kill rates and predation by wolves on ungulate populations in Biolowieza Primeval Forest (Poland). Ecology 83:1341–1356

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski G, Brandt S, Baubet E, Baudoin C (2005) Life-history patterns in female wild boars (Sus scrofa): mother-daughter postweaning associations. Can J Zool 83:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuling O, Stier N, Roth M (2008) How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L. ? Eur J Wildl Res 54:729–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuling O, Stier N, Roth M (2009) Commuting, shifting or remaining? Different spatial utilisation patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in forest and field crops during summer. Mamm Biol 74:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgo JC, Labisky RF, Fritzen DE (1998) Influences of hunting on the behavior of white-tailed deer: implications for conservation of the Florida panther. Conserv Biol 12:1359–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kufeld RC, Bowden DC, Schrupp DL (1988) Influence of hunting on movements of female mule deer. J Range Manage 41:70–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande US, Herfindal I, Finne MH, Kastdalen L (2009) Use of hunters in wildlife surveys: does hunter and forest grouse habitat selection coincide? Eur J Wildl Res 56:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Bednekoff PA (1999) Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am Nat 153:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard D, Fournier P (1995) Effects of shooting with hounds on size of resting range of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) groups in mediterranean habitat. IBEX J Mt Ecol 3:102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Main MB, Weckerly FW, Bleich VC (1996) Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. J Mammal 77:449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, MacDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals. Statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer Academic Publisher, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlroy JC, Saillard RJ (1989) The effect of hunting with dogs on the numbers and movements of feral pigs, Sus scrofa, and the subsequent success of poisoning exercises in Namadgi National Park, A.C.T. Aust Wildl Res 16:353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Sacchi O (2001) Habitat requirements of wild boars in the northern Apennines (N Italy): a multi-level approach. Ital J Zool 68:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquelle DG, Peek JM, Van Ballenberghe V (1992) Sexual segregation in Alaskan moose. Wildl Monogr 122:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzon A, Bento P (2004) An analysis of the hunting pressure on wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Tras-os-Montes region of northern Portugal in Alentejo, Portugal In: C. Fonseca, J. Herrero, A. L. and A.M.V.M. Soares (eds.). Wild boar research 2002. A selection and edited papers from the “4th international Wild boar symposium” Galemys 16(ne): 253–262

  • Nores C, Llaneza L, Álvarez MÁ (2008) Wild boar Sus scrofa mortality by hunting and wolf Canis lupus predation: an example in northern Spain. Wildl Biol 14:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (2001) Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Science 293:1786–1790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pellerin M, Saïd S, Gaillard JM (2008) Roe deer Capreolus capreolus home-range sizes estimated from VHF and GPS data. Wildl Biol 14:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poteaux C, Baubet E, Kaminski G, Brandt S, Dobson FS, Baudoin C (2009) Socio-genetic structure and mating system of a wild boar population. J Zool 278:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51:1077–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell C, Navàs F, Romero S et al. (2004) Activity patterns and social organization of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in a wetland environment: preliminary data on the effects of shooting individuals. in Alentejo, Portugal In: C. Fonseca, J. Herrero, A. L. and A.M.V.M. Soares (eds.). Wild boar research 2002. A selection and edited papers from the “4th international Wild boar symposium” Galemys 16(ne): 157–166

  • Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2002) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biol Rev 77:77–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saïd S, Gegout JC (2000) Using the age of the oldest woody specimen for studying post-pasture successions in Corsica (Mediterranean island). Acta Oecol 21:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos P, Mexia de Almeida L, Pretucci-Fonseca F (2004) Habitat selection by wild boar Sus scrofa L. in Alentejo, Portugal In: C. Fonseca, J. Herrero, A. L. and A.M.V.M. Soares (eds.). Wild boar research 2002. A selection and edited papers from the “4th international Wild boar symposium” Galemys 16(ne): 167–184

  • Scillitani L, Monaco A, Toso S (2010) Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 56:307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servanty S, Gaillard JM, Allaine D, Brandt S, Baubet E (2007) Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species: the wild boar. Behav Ecol 18:427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servanty S, Gaillard JM, Toïgo C, Brandt S, Baubet E (2009) Pulsed resources and climate induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under hunting pressure. J Anim Ecol 78:1278–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2003) Escape movement of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildl Biol 9:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2007) Impact of drive hunts on daytime resting site areas of wild boar family groups (Sus scrofa L.). Wildl Biol Pract 3:28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz F, Janeau G (1995) Daily selection of habitat in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Zool Soc Lond 237:423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankowich T (2008) Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 141:2159–2173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theuerkauf PJ, Rouys S (2008) Habitat selection by ungulates in relation to predation risk by wolves and humans in the Białowieza Forest. For Ecol Manage 256:1325–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DL, Taylor EJ (1990) Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. J Wildl Manage 54:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toïgo C, Servanty S, Gaillard JM, Brandt S, Baubet E (2008) Disentangling natural from hunting mortality in an intensively hunted wild boar population. J Wildl Manage 7:1532–1539

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolon V, Dray S, Loison A, Zeileis A, Fischer C, Baubet E (2009) Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear. Can J Zool 87:1129–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg L, Ostman O, Wennergren U (2005) Movement effects on equilibrium distributions of habitat generalists in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Model 188:432–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to Jean-Michel Gaillard, Philippe Aubry, Clément Calenge for their constructive comments on the manuscript. We thank Catherine Carter for revising the English manuscript. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for providing excellent suggestions for improving manuscript clarity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Baubet.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saïd, S., Tolon, V., Brandt, S. et al. Sex effect on habitat selection in response to hunting disturbance: the study of wild boar. Eur J Wildl Res 58, 107–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0548-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0548-4

Keywords

Navigation