Skip to main content
Log in

Testing predictions on body mass and gut contents: dissection of an African elephant Loxodonta africana Blumenbach 1797

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The values reported in the literature for the total gastrointestinal tract (GIT) content mass of elephants are lower than expected from interspecific mammalian regression. This finding agrees with theoretical considerations that elephants should have less capacious GITs than other herbivorous mammals, resulting in short ingesta retention times. However, the data on elephants was so far derived from either diseased zoo specimens or free-ranging animals subjected to an unknown hunting stress. In this study, we weighed the wet contents of the GIT segments of a captive African elephant that was euthanased because of a positive serological tuberculosis test, but that was clinically healthy, did not show a reduced appetite, and ingested food up to the time of euthanasia. The animal weighed 3,140 kg and its total gut contents were 542 kg or 17% of body mass. This is in close accord with the published mammalian herbivore regression equation of Parra (Comparison of foregut and hindgut fermentation in herbivores. In: Montgomery GG (ed) The ecology of arboreal folivores. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp205–230, 1978) and contradicts the notion that elephants have comparatively less capacious gastrointestinal tracts. Data on the individual gut segments, however, do support earlier suspicions that elephants have a comparatively less capacious caecum and a disproportionally capacious colon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benedict FG (1936) The physiology of the elephant. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss IO (1961) Some observations on food habits and behaviour of the African elephant. J Wildl Manage 25:131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauss M, Frey R, Kiefer B, Lechner-Doll M, Loehlein W, Polster C, Streich WJ, Rößner GE (2003) The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters. Oecologia 136:14–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens ET, Maloiy GMO (1982) Digestive physiology of three East African herbivores, the elephant, rhinoceros and hippopotamus. J Zool Lond 198:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Demment MW, Van Soest PJ (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. Am Nat 125:641–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist W (1851) A practical treatise on the treatment of the diseases of the elephant, camel, and horned cattle, with instructions for preserving their efficiency. Calcutta (cited by Benedict 1936)

  • Hungate RE, Phillips GD, McGregor A, Hungate DP (1959) Microbial fermentation in certain mammals. Science 130:1192–1194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laws RM, Parker ISC (1968) Recent studies on elephant populations in East Africa. Symp Zool Soc Lond 21:319–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws RM, Parker ISC, Johnstone RCB (1975) Elephants and their habitats. The ecology of elephants in North Bunyoro, Uganda. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlein W, Kienzle E, Wiesner H, Clauss M (2003) Investigations on the use of chromium oxide as an inert external marker in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus): passage and recovery rates. In: Fidgett A, Clauss M, Ganslosser U, Hatt JM, Nijboer J (eds) Zoo animal nutrition, vol II. Filander, Fürth, Germany, pp 223–232

  • Noback CV (1932) 36th Annual Report, New York Zoological Society, p 58 (cited by Benedict 1936)

  • Parra R (1978) Comparison of foregut and hindgut fermentation in herbivores. In: Montgomery GG (ed) The ecology of arboreal folivores. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 205–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson-Bullock W (1962) The weight of the African elephant (Loxdonta africana). Zool Soc Lond 138:133–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoshani J et al (1982) On the dissection of a female Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) and data from other elephants. Elephant 2:3–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoven W, Prins RA, Lankhorst A (1981) Fermentative digestion in the African elephant. S Afr J Wildl Res 11:78–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Camille Forel (Safari de Peaugres), Patrick Paubel (Etablissement Point équarissage), Valeria Café-Marçel, Helena Nimmervoll, Stefan Hoby, and Jérôme Foellmi for their support in planning and performing the dissection of the elephant. This is contribution no. 18 of the DFG research unit “Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Clauss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clauss, M., Robert, N., Walzer, C. et al. Testing predictions on body mass and gut contents: dissection of an African elephant Loxodonta africana Blumenbach 1797. Eur J Wildl Res 51, 291–294 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0113-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0113-0

Keywords

Navigation