Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of silviculture on dead wood and on the distribution and frequency of tree microhabitats in montane beech-fir forests of the Pyrenees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In forest ecosystems, the level of biodiversity is strongly linked to dead wood and tree microhabitats. To evaluate the influence of current forest management on the availability of dead wood and on the abundance and distribution of microhabitats, we studied the volume and diversity of dead wood objects and the distribution and frequency of cavities, dendrothelms, cracks, bark losses and sporophores of saproxylic fungi in montane beech-fir stands. We compared stands unmanaged for 50 or 100 years with continuously managed stands. A total of 1,204 live trees and 460 dead wood objects were observed. Total dead wood volume, snag volume and microhabitat diversity were lower in the managed stands, but the total number of microhabitats per ha was not significantly different between managed and unmanaged stands. Cavities were always the most frequent microhabitat and cracks the least frequent. Dendrothelm and bark loss were favored by management. Beech (Fagus sylvatica) carried many more microhabitats than silver fir (Abies alba), especially cavities, dendrothelms and bark losses. Fir very scarcely formed dendrothelms. Secondary tree species played an important role by providing cracks and bark losses. The proportion of microhabitat-bearing trees increased dramatically above circumference thresholds of 225 cm for beech and 215 cm for fir. Firs with a circumference of less than 135 cm did not carry microhabitats. In order to conserve microhabitat-providing trees and to increase the volume of dead wood in managed stands, we recommend conserving trees that finish their natural cycle over 10–20% of the surface area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardat J, Bioret F, Botineau M, Boullet V, Delpech R, Géhu JM, Haury J, Lacoste A, Rameau JC, Royer JM, Roux G, Touffet J (2004) Prodrome des végétations de France. (Patrimoines naturels, 61). MNHN, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrère P, Bouquet C, Debroas EJ, Pélissonnier H, Peybernès B, Soulé JC, Souquet P, Ternet Y (1982) Carte géologique de la France (1/50000), feuille Arreau (1072). BRGM, Orléans

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrère P, Bouquet C, Debroas EJ, Pélissonnier H, Peybernès B, Soulé JC, Souquet P, Ternet Y (1984) Notice explicative de la Carte géologique de la France (1/50000), feuille Arreau (1072). BRGM, Orléans

    Google Scholar 

  • Bässler C, Müller J (2010) Importance of natural disturbance for recovery of the rare polypore Antrodiella citrinella Niemelä & Ryvarden. Fungal Biol 114:129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauhus J, Puettmann K, Messier C (2009) Silviculture for old-growth attributes. For Ecol Manage 258:525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterlich W (1984) The relascope idea: relative measurements in forestry. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J (2005) Bois mort et cavités: leur rôle pour l’avifaune cavicole. In: Vallauri D et al (eds) Bois mort et à cavités: une clé pour les forêts vivantes. Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris, pp 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobiec A, Gutowski JM, Zub K, Pawlaczyk P, Laudenlayer WF (eds) (2005) The afterlife of a tree. WWF Poland, Warszawa-Hajnowka

    Google Scholar 

  • Branquart E, Liégeois S (2005) Normes de gestion pour favoriser la biodiversité dans les bois soumis au régime forestier (complément à la circulaire no 2619). Ministère de la Région wallonne, Direction Générale des Ressources Naturelles et de l’Environnement

  • Carey AB, Kershner J, Biswell B, Dominguez de Toledo LS (1999) Ecological scale and forest development: squirrels, dietary fungi, and vascular plants in managed and unmanaged forests. Wildl Monogr 142:1–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen M, Hahn K, Mountford E, Odor P, Standovar T, Rozenbergar D, Diaci J, Wijdeven S, Meyer P, Winter S, Vrska T (2005) Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For Ecol Manage 210:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline SP, Berg AB, Wight HM (1980) Snag characteristics and dynamics in Douglas-fir forests, western Oregon. J Wildl Manage 44:773–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (Chief ed) (1980) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the middle east and north Africa, vol 2 et 4. Oxford, Oxford University Press

  • Dajoz R (2007) Les insectes des forêts. Rôle et diversité des insectes dans le milieu forestier, 2ème édn. Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Darveau M, Desrochers A (2001) Le bois mort et la faune vertébrée; état des connaissances au Québec. Université de Laval, Centre de recherche en biologie forestière, Ministère des ressources naturelles

  • Davasse B (1992) Anthracology and carbonized forested areas. Some examples from east Pyrenees. Bulletin de la société Botanique de France; Actualités botaniques. Colloque sur le charbon, les écosystèmes anciens et le rôle de l’Homme. Montpellier 139(2–4):597–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Deconchat M (1994) Les boisements des terres agricoles comme outils d’aménagement écologique du paysage. Tome 1: Synthèse et catalogue bibliographique des effets des bois sur la biodiversité. INRA-URSAD/SOLAGRO

  • DeGraaf RM, Shigo AL (1985) Managing cavity trees for wildlife in the northeast. USDA Forest Service, General technical report NE-101

  • Drapeau P, Nappi A, St Germain M, Angers VA (2005) Les régimes naturels de perturbations, l’aménagement forestier et le bois mort dans la forêt boréale québécoise. In: Vallauri D et al (eds) Bois mort et à cavités: une clé pour les forêts vivantes. Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris, pp 46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bus de Warnaffe G, Lebrun P (2004) Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 118:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour D (2003) Étude de l’influence du bois mort sur l’avifaune cavernicole en forêt feuillue. Mémoire de fin d’études. FUSAGx, Gembloux

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Branquart E, Henin J-M, Fayt P (2005) Vieux arbres et bois mort: des composantes essentielles de la biodiversité forestière. In: Résumé des interventions de la journée d’étude «Gestion forestière et biodiversité». Gembloux, Ministère de la Région wallonne, Direction Générale des Ressources Naturelles et de l’Environnement, pp 22–24

  • Ellis MB, and Ellis JP (1998) Microfungi on miscellaneous substrates. An identification handbook. Richmond Publishing, Slough, England

  • Fan Z, Shifley S, Spetich MA, Thompson FR, Larsen D (2003) Distribution of cavity trees in Midwestern old-growth and second-growth forests. Can J For Res 33:1481–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Berg DR, Thornburgh DA, Tappeiner JC (1997) Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber haversting: variable retention harvest systems. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21 st century. The science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, pp 111–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridman J, Walheim M (2000) Amount, structure and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For Ecol Manage 131:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz O, Heilmann-Clausen J (2010) Rot holes create key microhabitats for epiphytic lichens and bryophytes on beech (Fagus sylvatica). Biol Conserv 143:1008–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigue J, Magdalou JA (2000) Réserve naturelle de la Massane: suivi forestier et cartographie assisté par SIG. Laboratoire Arago, Observatoire océanologique de Banyuls/Mer. Travaux scientifiques 55:44

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg O (2004) Old-Growth forests; characteristics, conservation and monitoring. GIP ATEN, habitat and species management. Technical report no 74

  • Girompaire L, Ballon P (1992) Conséquences de l’écorçage du cerf élaphe dans le massif des Vosges alsaciennes. Revue Forestière Française XLIV(6):501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonin P (1988) Contribution à l’étude de l’évolution des forêts non exploitées dans les Pyrénées. Association Forêts Pyrénéennes, St. Gaudens, p 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin M, Laroussinie O (coord.) (2004) Biodiversité et Gestion forestière: connaître pour préserver. Synthèse bibliographique. Cemagref, Nogent sur Vernisson France

  • Greenberg CH, McLeod DE, Loftis DL (1997) An old-growth definition for Western and mixed mesophytic forest. USDA, Southern research station, Gen tech rep SRS-16. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ (2002a) Saproxylic insect écology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ (2002b) The influence of forest management history on the integrity of the saproxylic beetle fauna in an Australian lowland tropical rain forest. Biol Conserv 104:149–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in ecological research, vol 15. Academic Press, London, pp 133–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy WM, Brooks RT, DeGraaf RM (1989) Cavity trees in sawtimbersize oak stands in central Massachusetts. Nor J Appl For 6:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiss E, Pericart J (2007) Hemiptères Aradidae Piesmatidae et Dipsocoromorphes euro-méditerranéens. Faune de France (France et régions limitrophes) 91. Fédération Française des sociétés de sciences naturelles

  • Hothorn T, Hornik K (2005) The coin package—conditional inference procedure in a permutation tes-framework, 0.4-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org

  • Hothorn T, Lausen B (2003) On the exact distribution of maximally selected rank statistics. Comput Stat Data Anal 43(2):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Zeileis A (2008) Generalized maximally selected statistics. Biometrics 64:1263–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Hornik K, Van de Wiel MA, Zeilis A (2006a) A Lego-system for conditional inference. Am Stat 60:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006b) Party: a laboratory for recursive part(y)itioning. http://CRAN.R-project.org/

  • Kitching RL (1971) An ecological study of water-filled tree-holes and their position in the woodland ecosystem. J Animal Ecol 40(2):281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrieu L, Brustel H, Cabanettes A, Corriol G, Delarue A, Harel M, Loireau JN, Sarthou JP (2010) Impact de l’anthropisation ancienne sur la biodiversité d’un habitat de hêtraie-sapinière montagnarde. Revue Forestière Française 4–2009:351–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausen B, Schumacher M (1992) Maximally selected rank statistics. Biometrics 1(48):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisiewska M (1992) Macrofungi on special substrates. In: Winterhoff W (ed) Fungi in vegetation science. Kluwer, Netherlands, pp 151–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb S (1999) Response of small mammals to coarse woody debris in a south-eastern pine forest. J Mammal 80(2):460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucan RK, Hanak V, Horacek I (2009) Long-term re-use of tree roosts by European forest bats. For Ecol Manage 258:1301–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannan RW, Meslow EC, Wright HM (1980) Use of snags by birds in Douglas-fir forests, western Oregon. J Wildl Manage 44:787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Kaila L, Haila Y (1998) Threatened beetles in white-backed woodpecker habitats. Cons Biol 12(2):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Punttila P, Kaila L, Rauh J (2000) Species richness of coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forest in southern Finland. Biol Conserv 94:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maser C, Trappe JM, Cline SP, Cromack K, Blaschke H, Sedell JR, Swanson FJ (1984) The seen and unseen world of the fallen tree. Gen Tech Rep PNW 164. USDA Forest service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR

  • McClelland BR, Frissell SS (1975) Identifying forest snags useful for hole-nesting birds. J For 73(7):414–417

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan PC, Means J, Hawk GM, Crmack KJ, Fogel R (1977) Log decomposition in an old growth Douglas-fir forest. In: Northwest scientific association abstract of papers presented at the 50th annual meeting, Washington State University Press, Pullman, WA

  • McMinn JW, Crossley DA (eds) (1996) Biodiversity and coarse woody debris in southern forests. Proceedings of the workshop on coarse woody debris in the southern forest: effect on biodiversity. USDA Forest Service, southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, p 146

  • Meschede A, Heller KG (2003) Ecologie et protection des chauves-souris en milieu forestier. MHN de Genève. Le Rhinolophe 16:1–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Métailié JP (1984) La forêt paysanne dans les Pyrénées centrales. Revue Géographique des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest 55(2):231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Métailié JP (2001) Un patrimoine historico-environnemental: les forêts pastorales dans les Pyrénées. In: Actes du 126ème congrès national des sociétés historiques et scientifiques, Toulouse. Paysages, territoires et aménagement dans le sud de la France, pp 33–47

  • Michel AK, Winter S (2009) Tree microhabitat structures as indicators of biodiversity in Douglas-fir forests of different stand ages and management histories in the Pacific Northwest, USA. For Ecol Manage 257:1453–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moning C, Müller J (2008) Environmental key factors and their thresholds for the avifauna of temperate montane forests. For Ecol Manage 256:1198–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moning C, Müller J (2009) Critical forest age thresholds for the diversity of lichens, molluscs and birds in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) dominated forests. Ecol Indic 9:922–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moning C, Werth S, Dziock F, Bässler C, Bradtka J, Hothorn T, Müller J (2009) Lichen diversity in temperate montane forests is influenced by forest structure more than climate. For Ecol Manage 258:745–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Bütler R (2010) A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. Eur J Forest Res 129:981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN, Liu Y (1991) Coarse woody debris in an old-growth deciduous forest on the Cumberland Plateau, southeastern Kentucky. Can J For Res 21:1567–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimbene J, Marini L, Nimis PL (2009) Influence of tree species on epiphytic macrolichens in temperate mixed forests of northern Italy. Can J For Res 39(4):785–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson SG, Niklasson M, Hedin J, Aronsson G, Gutowski JM, Linder P, Ljungberg H, Mikusinnski G, Ranius T (2002) Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 161:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norden B, Ryberga M, Gotmark F, Olaussona B (2004) Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol Conserv 117:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norsted G, Bader P, Ericson L (2001) Polypores as indicators of conservation value in Corsican pine forests. Biol Conserv 99:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odor P, Heilmann-Clausen J, Christensen M, Aude E, van Dort KW, Piltaver A, Siller I, Veerkamp MT, Walleyng R, Standovar T, van Hees AFM, Kosec J, Matocec N, Kraigher H, Grebenc T (2006) Diversity of dead wood inhabiting fungi and bryophytes in semi-natural beech forests in Europe. Biol Conserv 131:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardé J, Bouchon J (1988) Dendrométrie, 2ème édn. ENGREF Nancy, France

  • Pénicaud P (2000) Chauves-souris arboricoles en Bretagne: typologie de 60 arbres-gîtes et éléments de l’écologie des espèces observées. Le Rhinolophe 14:37–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponthus C (1996) Inventaire des forêts subnaturelles des Pyrénées françaises. Mémoire de fin d’études. ENSA Toulouse (ONF)

  • Radek K, Lucan R, Hanak V, Horacek I (2009) Long-term re-use of tree roosts by European forest bats. For Ecol Manage 258:1301–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rameau JC, Gauberville C, Drapier N (2000) Gestion forestière et diversité biologique; identification et gestion intégrée des habitats et espèces d’intérêt communautaire. IDF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2002) Influence of stand size and quality of tree hollows on saproxylic beetles in Sweden. Biol Conserv 103:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Henin J (2001) The dispersal rate of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Oecologia 126:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Richard F, Millot S, Gardes M, Selosse MA (2005) Diversity and specificity of ectomycorrhizal fungi retrieved from an old-growth Mediterranean forest dominated by Quercus ilex L. New Phytol 166:1011–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ringvall A, Stahl G (1999) On the field performance of transect relascope sampling for assessing downed coarse woody debris. Scand J For Res 14:552–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondeux J (1993) La mesure des arbres et des peuplements forestiers. Les presses agronomiques de Gembloux

  • Samuelsson J, Gustafsson L, Ingelög T (1994) Dying and dead trees: a review of their importance for biodiversity, Swedish threatened species unit, Uppsala

  • Schaeffer L (1949) Tarifs rapides et tarifs lents. Revue Forestière Française 1:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidl J, Sulzer P, Kitching RL (2008) The insect assemblage in water filled tree-holes in a European temperate deciduous forest: community composition reflects structural, trophic and physicochemical factors. Hydrobiologia 598:285–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmit JP, Lodge DJ (2005) Classical methods and modern analysis for studying fungal diversity. In: Dighton J, White J, Oudemans P (eds) The fungal community; Its organization and role in the ecosystem, 3rd edn (Mycology Volume 3). CRC Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 193–214

  • Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49:11–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sippola AL (2001) Forest structure and biodiversity in northern boreal forests; effects of regeneration cutting on flying beetles and wood-decomposing fungi. Artic Centre Reports 35. Helsinki: Hakapaino Oy

  • Sippola AL, Renvall P (1999) Wood-decomposing fungi and seed-tree cutting: a 40 years perspective. For Ecol Manage 115:183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sippola AL, Siitonen J, Kallio R (1998) Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland. Scand J For Res 13:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1971) Méthodes statistiques. Traduction française Boelle H, Camhaji E. ACTA, Paris

  • Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic invertrebrates and their conservation. Council Eur Nat Environ Ser 42:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprent P (1992) Pratique des statistiques non paramétriques. Traduction française Ley JP. INRA, Paris

  • Stanska M, Rozwaka R, Kowalczyk K (2010) Dipoena torva (Thorell, 1875) spider living on tree stems. Lesne Prace Badawcze 71(2):201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokland JN, Tomter SM, Söderberg U (2004) Development of dead wood indicators for biodiversity monitoring: experiences from Scandinavia. In: Marchetti M (ed) Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe—from ideas to operationality, EFI workshop, November 12th–15th 2003, Firenze, Italy, vol 51

  • Ternet Y, Barrère P, Debroas EJ (1995) Notice explicative de la Carte géologique de la France (1/50000), feuille Campan (1071). BRGM Orléans

  • Ternet Y, Barrère P, Dallas S, Debon F, Debroas EJ, François JM, Pouget P (1996) Carte géologique de la France (1/50000), feuille Campan (1071). BRGM, Orléans

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillon L (2005) Biodiversité, dynamique et conservation des petits mammifères cavicoles en France. In: Vallauri D et al (eds) Bois mort et à cavités: une clé pour les forêts vivantes. Tec et Doc Lavoisier, Paris, pp 145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillon L (2006) Etude des gîtes sylvestres en forêt domaniale de Rambouillet. Symbioses 15:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant F (1978) Les Systenus et leur habitat dendrotelme. Bull Société Ent Fr 83:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallauri D, André J, Blondel J (2002) Le bois mort, un attribut vital de la biodiversité de la forêt naturelle, une lacune de la forêt gérée. WWF-France, Paris

  • Vane CH, DrageTC SnapeCE (2006) Bark decay by the white-rot fungus Lentinula edodes: Polysaccharide loss, lignin resistance and the unmasking of suberin. Inter Biodeter Biodegr 57:14–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall PH, Young SS (1993) On adjusting P-values for multplicity. Biometrics 49:941–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Möller GC (2008) Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. For Ecol Manage 255:1251–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wonoroff D (1984) Forges prédatrices, forges protectrices. Revue Géographique des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest, tome 55(2):213–218

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study piloted by the Centre Régional de la Propriété Forestière de Midi-Pyrénées was financed with the help of European funds (FEDER) as well as French grants (Conseil régional de Midi-Pyrénées, Conseil général des Hautes-Pyrénées). We wish to thank the owners of the forests for their welcome and especially Jean-Louis Chaire. Thanks to Annie Ouin, Antoine Brin and the two anonymous reviewers of the journal for their constructive comments and their suggestions for the improvement of the manuscript. Thanks also to Mark Hewison for the checking of the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Larrieu.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Müller.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10342_2011_551_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Complementary data on characteristics of studied stands, main relationships tree microhabitats and taxa, decay stage definitions, comparison of dead wood volume per decay stage and per dead wood object type and girth thresholds for microhabitat presence. (PDF 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larrieu, L., Cabanettes, A. & Delarue, A. Impact of silviculture on dead wood and on the distribution and frequency of tree microhabitats in montane beech-fir forests of the Pyrenees. Eur J Forest Res 131, 773–786 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0551-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0551-z

Keywords

Navigation