Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Morphological, Pomological, and Biochemical Characteristics of Important Turkish Olive Varieties Grown in the Southeastern Anatolian Region (Turkey) Conditions

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olive (Olea europaea L.) production is performed in approximately 40 countries around the world using varieties with quite different characteristics. Commercial varieties for table olives and olive oil production in each country have their important characteristics. Olive, which is a natural plant species of the Mediterranean basin, is grown intensively in areas where similar climatic conditions are dominant. In the present study, Turkish varieties in the olive collection garden of Gaziantep, which has a rough terrain and is located in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey, were used as the study material. The study was conducted for 2 years (2016 and 2017) to determine the morphological and pomological (leaf, flower, fruit, and seed) characteristics and fatty acid compositions of 28 different Turkish olive varieties. It was determined that there are significant differences between olive varieties in terms of all the characteristics examined in the study. It was observed in general that the petioles of the varieties that had longer leaf lengths, and the number of flowers of the varieties that had longer pedicels were higher. ‘Celebi’, ‘Izmir Sofralik Olive’, and ‘Karamursel Su’ varieties yielded high fruit length and fruit width values, and the ‘Sari Ulak’ variety had the highest fruit index value. It was also found that the oil content of the varieties varied between 16.76% and 31.86%, and the oil content of ‘Kilis Yaglik’ and ‘Kalembezi’ varieties was over 30%. It was determined that palmitic acid, one of the saturated fatty acids, and oleic acid, one of the unsaturated fatty acids, had high ratios in the fatty acid composition, and the ‘Celebi’, ‘Kalembezi’, ‘Kancelebi’, ‘Karamursel Su’, ‘Kiraz’, ‘Nizip Yaglik’, ‘Samanli’, ‘Saurani’, ‘Tavsan Yuregi’, and ‘Yag Celebi’ varieties stood out with their oleic acid content of over 75%. Also, the ‘Erkence’ variety, which had the highest palmitic acid (15.16%) ratio, had the lowest oleic acid (61.32%) and the highest linoleic acid (15.71%) ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arslan Ç, Uzun B, Ülger S, Çağırgan İM (2007) Determination of oil content and fatty acid composition of sesame mutants suited for intensive management conditions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 84(10):917–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aydın R, ve Nizamoğlu A (1995) Silifke Yağlık çeşidinde klonal seleksiyon çalışmaları. Türkiye II. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, Adana, 3–6 Ekim 1995, pp 731–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey AE (1951) Industrial oil and fat products. Industrial oil and fat products, 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldoni L, Tosti N, Ricciolini C, Belaj A, Arcioni S, Pannelli G, Porceddu A (2006) Genetic structure of wild and cultivated olives in the central Mediterranean basin. Ann Bot 98(5):935–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bayazit, S. (2007). Phenological, morphological, pomological and molecular characteristics of the wild almond genotypes collected from different ecotypes of Turkey (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis. Doktora Tezi, Basılmamıs, Çukurova University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Horticulture, Adana).

  • Besnard G, Breton C, Baradat P, Khadari B, Bervillé A (2001) Cultivar identification in olive based on RAPD markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126(6):668–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canözer Ö (1991) Yerli ve Yabancı Zeytin Çeşitlerinin Özelliklerinin Tespiti ve Kolleksiyon Zeytinliği Tesisi (Sonuç Raporu). Zeytincilik Arastırma Enstitüsü Bornova İzmir 24:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Çetin Ö, Nurengin METE, Şahin M, Sefer F, Hülya KAYA, Güloğlu U, Uluçay N (2016) Memecik x Uslu melezi (F1) zeytin genotiplerinin pomolojik özellikleri. Zeytin Bilim 6(1):9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbou S, Brahmi F, Taamali A, Issaoui M, Ouni Y, Braham M, Hammami M (2010) Extra virgin olive oil components and oxidative stability from olives grown in Tunisia. J Am Oil Chem Soc 87(10):1199–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dıraman H, Öztürk B, Özdemir D (2014) Chemometric classification of virgin olive oils produced from Gemlik cultivar by using some choromatographic and spectroscopic data. GIDA J Food 39(2):79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Dölek B (2003) Erdemli, Silifke ve Mut ilçelerinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan sofralık ve yağlık zeytin çeşit ve tiplerinin morfolojik, fenolojik ve pomolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Ç.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana (80s)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri A, Hormaza JI, Polito VS (1995) Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120(3):538–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2020) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, https://www.fao.org/home/en

  • Ferrara E, Papa G, Lamparelli F (2000) Evaluation of the olive germplasm in the Apulia region: Biological and technological characteristics. IV International Symposium on Olive Growing 586, pp 159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholami R, Zahedi SM (2019) Identifying superior drought-tolerant olive genotypes and their biochemical and some physiological responses to various irrigation levels. J Plant Nutr 42(17):2057–2069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gundogdu MA, Kaynas K (2015) Investigation of biochemical and pomological characteristics of different olive cultivars during maturation in North Aegean region of Turkey. In: III Balkan Symposium on Fruit Growing 1139, pp 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundogdu MA, Kaynas K (2018) Investigation of fatty acid compositions and some pomological characteristics of different olive cultivars during maturation in cool subtropical condition of Turkey. In: XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: VII International Symposium on Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, Avocado, II 1299, pp 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH, Brummitt RK, Culham A, Seberg O (2007) Flowering plant families of the world vol 88. Firefly books, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JB Jr, Wolf B, Mills HA (1991) Plant analysis handbook. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. Micro-Macro Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaleci N, Gündoğdu MA, Doğan E, Nergis O (2016) Bazı yabancı kökenli zeytin çeşitlerinin olgunlaşma süresince pomolojik ve bazı biyokimyasal özelliklerindeki değişimlerin incelenmesi. Zeytin Bilim 6(2):119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Karadag S, Aktug Tahtacı S, Yaman A, Ulusaraç A, Aksu O (2004) Adaptation of Olive (Olea europaea L.) In Southeastern Anatolian Region. In: V International Symposium on Olive Growing 791, pp 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Kıralan M, Bayrak A, Özkaya MT (2009) Oxidation stability of virgin olive oils from some important cultivars in East Mediterranean area in Turkey. J Am Oil Chem Soc 86(3):247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konuskan DB (2017) Fatty Acid and Sterol Compositions of Hatay Olive Oils. Turk J Agric Sci Technol 5(2):170–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Küçükyaşar S, Pazır F (2019) Organik ve Konvansiyonel Memecik Çeşidi Yeşil Zeytinler Arasındaki Fiziksel, Kimyasal ve Pomolojik Özellikler Açısından Farklılıklar. Akademik Gıda 17(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavee S, Rallo L, Rapoport HF, Troncoso A (1996) The floral biology of the olive: effect of flower number, type and distribution on fruitset. Sci Hortic 66(3–4):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodolini EM, Polverigiani S, Ali S, Mutawea M, Qutub M, Arabasi T, Neri D (2017) Oil characteristics of four Palestinian olive varieties. J Oleo Sci 66(5):435–441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi S, Sebastiani L, Minnocci A, Vitagliano C, Tognetti R (2004) Photosynthetic capacity and leaf structure during shoot development in Olea europaea. In: V International Symposium on Olive Growing 791, pp 473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Nergiz C, Engez Y (2000) Compositional variation of olive fruit during ripening. Food Chem 69(1):55–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’brien RD (2008) Fats and oils: formulating and processing for applications. CRC press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaya MT, Cakir E, Gokbayrak Z, Ercan H, Taskin N (2006) Morphological and molecular characterization of Derik Halhali olive (Olea europaea L.) accessions grown in Derik-Mardin province of Turkey. Sci Hortic 108(2):205–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli A, Malfatti A, Lucera L, Contento S, Sotiriou E (2005) Effects of processing techniques on the natural colourings and the other functional constituents in virgin olive oil. Food Res Int 38(8–9):873–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakar E (2015) Determination of morphological, pomological and physicochemical properties of olive genetic resources in Gaziantep province. Ziraat Fak Derg Atatürk Üniv 46(2):85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari E, Kim M, Salley SO, Ng KS (2013) A highly active nanocomposite silica-carbon supported palladium catalyst for decarboxylation of free fatty acids for green diesel production: Correlation of activity and catalyst properties. Appl Catal A Gen 467:261–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seker M, Gundogdu MA, Ipek MS (2010) Analysis of genetic diversity of local olive varieties in turkey by AFLP markers. In: XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): III International Symposium on 918, pp 269–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiada V, Tsarouhas P, Varzakas T (2020) Comparison and discrimination of two major monocultivar extra virgin olive oils in the southern region of Peloponnese, according to specific compositional/traceability markers. Foods 9(2):155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ulas M, Gezerel O (2004) Studies on the morphological, phenological and pomological characteristics of some table olive and olive oil cultivars in Cukurova region. In: V International Symposium on Olive Growing 791, pp 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Zare D, Salmanizade F, Safiyari H (2012) Some physical and mechanical properties of Russian olive fruit. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int J Biol Biomol Agric Food Biotechnol Eng 6(9):668–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Spiegel-Roy P (1975) Beginnings of fruit growing in the old world: olive, grape, date, and fig emerge as important bronze age additions to grain agriculture in the near east. Science 187(4174):319–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Nikpeyma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Y. Nikpeyma declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature oder sein Lizenzgeber (z.B. eine Gesellschaft oder ein*e andere*r Vertragspartner*in) hält die ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechte an diesem Artikel kraft eines Verlagsvertrags mit dem/den Autor*in(nen) oder anderen Rechteinhaber*in(nen); die Selbstarchivierung der akzeptierten Manuskriptversion dieses Artikels durch Autor*in(nen) unterliegt ausschließlich den Bedingungen dieses Verlagsvertrags und dem geltenden Recht.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikpeyma, Y. Determination of Morphological, Pomological, and Biochemical Characteristics of Important Turkish Olive Varieties Grown in the Southeastern Anatolian Region (Turkey) Conditions. Erwerbs-Obstbau 65, 1755–1768 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00843-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00843-6

Keywords

Navigation