Abstract
Caprifig (Ficus carica L.) as pollen sources, play a major role in edible fig caprification by Blastophaga psenes L. The present study was carried out to evaluate the potential of three caprifig genotypes (Poozdombali, Kouhi and Kouhaki) for the shelter of B. psenes wasp in Estahban region, Fars province, Iran. Summer (profichi) crop fruits per genotype were harvested in full maturity period and evaluated for five times for the shelter of B. psenes wasp. Significant differences among caprifig genotypes were found for B. psenes number for the three times carried out (0, 21 and 28 days), but they did not show significant differences for two times (7 and 14 days). At day of harvesting, Poozdombali showed the highest B. psenes wasp number (341.33) and Kouhaki had the lowest (200.00) and they showed significant differences for this character in this time. Also, seven days after harvesting, Poozdombali showed the highest wasp number (106.67) and Kouhi and Kouhaki had the lowest (104.33), but not significant difference. Number of B. psenes at the day of harvesting was the highest for all of the genotypes and at 28 days after harvesting was the lowest. Cluster analysis identified two major clusters with several sub-clusters. Caprifig trees with having high B. psenes number are essential for a suitable caprification. Thus, Poozdombali genotype with the highest B. psenes number, is suitable in this important trait to be used for edible figs caprification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck NG, Lord EM (1988) Breeding system in Ficus carica, the common fig. I. floral diversity. Am J Bot 75:1904–1912
De Candolle A (1967) Origin of cultivated plants. Hafner Publishing, New York (Reprint of the 2nd Edition of 1886)
Condit IJ (1941) Fig characteristics useful in the identification of varieties. Hilgardia 14(1). doi:10.3733/hilg.v14n01p001
FAO (2012) FAOSTAT production crops. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed 21 Feb 2013
Ferguson L (1977) Fig breeding. Advanced course on fig production. EUFA, Turkey
Machado CA, Jousselin E, Kjellberg F, Compton SG, Herre EA (2001) Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig pollinating wasps. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 268:7–10
Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2. 1. Exeter Software, Setauket
SAS (1990) SAS user’s guide: SAS/STAT, SAS BASIC. Version 6.07, 4th edn.
Storey WB (1975) Figs. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, Purdue, pp 568–589
Storey WB (1955) Sex inheritance in figs. California Fig Institute. Proc Annu Res Conf 9:15–17
Storey WB (1979) Fig, Ficus carica (Moraceae). In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London, pp 205–208
Stover E, Aradhya M (2008) Fig genetic resources and research at the US national clonal germplasm repository in Davis, California. Acta Hort 798:57–68
Zeybekoglu NS, Mısırlı A, Gülcan R (1998) Researches on pollen germination ability of some caprifig varieties. Acta Hort 480:125–128
Zohary D, Spiegel-Roy P (1975) Beginnings of fruit growing in old world. Science 187:319–327
Condit IJ (1955) Fig varieties: a monograph. Hilgardia 23(11):323–538
Condit IJ (1969) Ficus: The exotic species. Univ. California, Div Agr Sci Berkeley Cormier
Khadivi-Khub A, Anjam K (2014) Characterization and evaluation of male fig (caprifig) accessions in Iran. Plant Syst Evol 300(10):2177–2189
Khadivi-Khub A, Anjam K (2016) The relationship of fruit size and light condition with number, activity and price of Blastophaga psenes wasp in caprifigs. Trees 30(5):1855–1862
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
K. Anjam, A. Khadivi-Khub and A. Sarkhosh state that they have no competing interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anjam, K., Khadivi-Khub, A. & Sarkhosh, A. The Potential of Caprifig Genotypes for Sheltering Blastophaga psenes L. for Caprification of Edible Figs. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59, 45–49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0296-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0296-4