Skip to main content
Log in

Lobesia botrana males mainly fly at dusk: video camera-assisted pheromone traps and implications for mating disruption

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pheromone-mediated mating disruption (MD) is currently considered an effective strategy to control the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana, with a successful interference on natural female calling during the male searching flight. However, little is known on the impact of the hour of the day on EGVM male flight. While various models forecasting the day of maximum presence of males per flight have been developed, field research on the male flight activity over 24 hours is scarce. Hence, we used video camera-assisted pheromone traps to allow a continuous monitoring of EGVM flights over daylight and night hours, quantifying captures of males. Experiments were carried out in three vineyards located in northern Spain over two years (2016 and 2017). Results showed that EGVM flight mainly occurred between 21:00 and 23:00 h (GMT+1, daylight saving time). Furthermore, male catches significantly differed over the study year, annual flight period and vineyard. Most of the dispensers used worldwide for EGVM MD continuously release the main sex pheromone component [(7E,9Z)-7,9-dodecadien-1-yl acetate], except for some automatic devices releasing puffs of sex pheromones at selected time intervals. The findings presented here can be useful to optimize the MD technique, identifying selected time intervals when the release of EGVM synthetic pheromones can be concentrated, boosting MD efficacy against this important pest, minimizing the release of synthetic sex pheromone molecules in the environment and reducing application costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amo-Salas M, Ortega-Lopez V, Harman R, Alonso-Gonzalez A (2011) A new model for predicting the flight activity of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Crop Prot 30:1586–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anfora G, Baldessari M, De Cristofaro A, Germinara GS, Ioriatti C, Reggiori F et al (2008) Control of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by biodegradable Ecodian sex pheromone dispensers. J Econ Entomol 101(2):444–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batiste WC (1970) A timing sex-pheromone trap with special reference to codling moth collections. J Econ Entomol 63(3):915–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batiste WC, Olson WH, Berlowitz A (1973a) Codling moth: influence of temperature and daylight intensity on periodicity of daily flight in the field. J Econ Entomol 66(4):883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batiste WC, Olson WH, Berlowitz A (1973b) Codling moth: diel periodicity of catch in synthetic sex attractant versus female-baited traps. Environ Entomol 2(4):673–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bovey P (1966) Super-famille des Tortricoidea. In: Balachowsky AS (ed) Entomologie appliqué à l’agriculture. Tome II. Lépidopterés, premier volume. Masson et Cie, Paris, pp 461–486, pp 859–887

  • Brockerhoff EG, Suckling DM, Kimberley M, Richardson B, Coker G, Gous S, Kerr JL, Cowan DM, Lance DR, Strand T, Zhang A (2012) Aerial application of pheromones for mating disruption of an invasive moth as a potential eradication tool. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043767

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JA (2006) Pheromone component patterns of moth evolution revealed by computer analysis of the Pherolist. J Anim Ecol 75(2):399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Varela LG, Smith RJ, Whitmer DR, Simmons GA, Lucchi A, Broadway R, Steinhauer R (2014) Growers, scientists and regulators collaborate on European grapevine moth program. Calif Agric 4:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sayed A, Gödde J, Witzgall P, Arn H (1999) Characterization of pheromone blend for grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana by using flight track recording. J Chem Ecol 25:389–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sayed AM, Gödde J, Arn H (2000) A computer-controlled video system for real-time recording of insect flight in three dimensions. J Insect Behav 13:881–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel B, Stockel J (1988) Studies of the flight behaviour of the European vine moth, Lobesia botrana Den. et Schiff. (Lep., Tortricidae). J Appl Entomol 105:205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo A, Ocete R, Lopez MA, Maistrello L, Ortega F, Samedo A, Soria FJ (2009) Forecasting the flight activity of Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermuller) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Southwestern Spain. J Appl Entomol 133:626–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz B (1939) Untersuchungen über die Wirkung des Sexualduftstoffes bei den Traubenwicklern Clysia ambiguella und Polychrosis botrana. Z. Angew Entomol 26:143–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz B (1943) Freiland- und Laboratoriums-Untersuchungen über Ausschlüpfen, Eiablage und Nahrungsaufnahme bei den Traubenwicklern Clysia ambiguella und Polychrosis botrana. Wein und Rebe 25:135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot AT (2014) Circadian rhythms of sexual activities in moths: a review. Front Ecol Evol 2:43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harari AR, Zahavi T, Thiéry D (2011) Fitness cost of pheromone production in signaling female moths. Evolution 65(6):1572–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harari AR, Zahavi T, Steinitz H (2015) Female detection of the synthetic sex pheromone contributes to the efficacy of mating disruption of the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. Pest Manag Sci 71:316–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KF, Birch MC (1986) Temporal reproductive isolation between 2 species of plume moths (Lepidoptera, Pterophoridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel HE (2017) A brief review on Lobesia botrana mating disruption by mechanically distributing and releasing sex pheromones from biodegradable mesofiber dispensers. Biochem Mol Biol J 3:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtrel B, Thiéry D (1999) Modulation of flight activity in Lobesia botrana Den & Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) females studied in wind tunnel. J Insect Behav 12:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A (2016) Semiochemical strategies for tortricid moth control in apple orchards and vineyards in Italy. J Chem Ecol 42(7):571–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Bagnoli B (2008) Grape areawide pest management in Italy. In: Koul et al (ed) Areawide pest management: theory and implementation. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 208–225

  • Ioriatti C, Anfora G, Tasin M, De Cristofaro A, Witzgall P, Lucchi A (2011) Chemical ecology and management of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 104(4):1125–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Varela LG (2012) Grape berry moths in Western European vineyards and their recent movement into the New World. In: Bostanian NJ et al (eds) Arthropod management in vineyards: pests, approaches, and future directions. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4032-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lance DR, Leonard DS, Mastro VC, Walters ML (2016a) Mating disruption as a suppression tactic in programs targeting regulated lepidopteran pests in US. J Chem Ecol 42(7):590–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lance DR, Leonard DS, Mastro VC, Walters ML (2016b) Towards pesticide-free farming? Sharing needs and knowledge promotes integrated pest management. Environ Sci Poll Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1919-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi A, Benelli G (2018) Towards pesticide-free farming? Sharing needs and knowledge promotes Integrated Pest Management. Environ Sci Poll Res https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1919-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi A, Ladurner E, Iodice A, Savino F, Ricciardi R, Cosci F, Conte G, Benelli G (2018a) Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers—a green route to manage the European grapevine moth? Environ Sci Poll Res. 25(10), 9426–9442, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1248-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi A, Sambado P, Juan Royo AB, Bagnoli B, Conte G, Benelli G (2018b) Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices. Environ Sci Poll Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2341-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf RL (1962) Destructive and useful insects, their habits and control, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp 403–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar JG (2007) Insect pheromones for integrated pest management: promise versus reality. Redia 90:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Gut LJ (2015) Mating disruption for the 21st Century: matching technology with mechanism. Environ Entomol 44(3):427–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Gut LJ, De Lame FM, Stelinski LL (2006) Differentiation of competitive versus non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (Part 2): case studies. J Chem Ecol 32(10):2115–2143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller K, Arenas L, Thiéry D, Moreau J (2016) Direct benefits from choosing a virgin male in the European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana. Animal Behav 114:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro-Roldán MA, Gemeno C (2017) Sublethal effects of neonicotinoid insecticide on calling behavior and pheromone production of tortricid moths. J Chem Ecol 43(9):881–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reineke A, Thiéry D (2016) Grapevine insect pests and their natural enemies in the age of global warming. J Pest Sci 89:313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs WL, Cardé RT (1974) Sex pheromones in the reproductive isolation of lepidopterous species. In: Birch MC (ed) pheromones. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 96–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting D, Eya DB (2010) Human Health Risk Assessment of Isomate®-EGVM. Report reviewed by the Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency and the California Department of Public Health, 39 pp

  • Welter S, Pickel C, Millar J, Cave F, Van Steenwyk R, Dunley J (2005) Pheromone mating disruption offers selective management options for key pests. Calif Agric 59(1):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall P, Arn H (1990) Direct measurement of the flight behavior of male moths to calling females and synthetic sex pheromones. Zeitsch Naturforsch 45:1067–1069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A (2010) Sex pheromones and their impact on Pest Management. J Chem Ecol 36(1):80–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Trapview (Hruševje, Slovenia) e CBC Iberia (Barcelona, Spain) for their technical assistance, as well as for the tools and facilities kindly provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Benelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests. The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely to provide specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the author institutions.

Additional information

Communicated by P. G. Becher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucchi, A., Sambado, P., Juan Royo, A.B. et al. Lobesia botrana males mainly fly at dusk: video camera-assisted pheromone traps and implications for mating disruption. J Pest Sci 91, 1327–1334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1002-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1002-0

Keywords

Navigation