Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pheromone-mediated mating disruption (MD) is widely used as a control tool to manage the European grapevine moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana. Most of the MD formulations are “passive” reservoir dispensers, which need to be used at a rather large number of units per hectare. A promising alternative is represented by automatic aerosol devices, releasing pheromone puffs at programmed time intervals. Herein, we investigated the effectiveness of MD aerosol product Isonet® L MisterX841 in reducing EGVM infestation on grape in comparison to the reference MD product Isonet® L and the grower’s standard. Experiments were carried out over 2 years in two different study sites of Aragon region (Spain). EGVM male catches were monitored using traps baited with the female sex pheromone. The effectiveness of MD formulations against the three generations of EGVM was assessed by determining the percentage of infested bunches and the number of nests per bunch. As expected, a much greater amount of male catches in the grower’s standard over Isonet® L MisterX841 and Isonet ® L was observed. No significant differences about EGVM male catches were found in vineyards where Isonet® L MisterX841 and Isonet® L were used. EGVM-infested bunches, as well as number of nests per bunch, were higher in the grower’s standard, if compared to vineyards where we tested Isonet® L MisterX841 and Isonet® L. However, the employ of the latter led to a lower EGVM bunch infestation, if compared to Isonet® L MisterX841. Overall, the MD approach proposed here is effective against EGVM. These aerosol devices require a lower number of units per hectare if compared to hand-applied dispensers, saving labor costs and contributing to reduce plastic disposal in agricultural settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anfora G, Baldessari M, De Cristofaro A, Germinara GS, Ioriatti C, Reggiori F et al (2008) Control of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by biodegradable Ecodian sex pheromone dispensers. J Econ Entomol 101:444–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker TC, Ditt T, Mafra-Neto A (1997) Disruption of sex pheromone communication in the blackheaded fireworm in Wisconsin cranberry marshes by using MSTRS devices. J Agric Entomol 14:449–457

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benelli G (2018) Plant-borne compounds and nanoparticles: challenges for medicine, parasitology and entomology. Environ Sci Poll Res 25:10149–10150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Suckling DM, Kimberley M, Richardson B, Coker G, Gous S, Kerr JL, Cowan DM, Lance DR, Strand T, Zhang A (2012) Aerial application of pheromones for mating disruption of an invasive moth as a potential eradication tool. PLoS One 7:e43767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burks CS, Brandl DG (2004) Seasonal abundance of the navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella, in figs and the effect of peripheral aerosol dispensers on sexual communication. J Insect Sci 4(1):40 available online: insectscience.org/4.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JA (2006) Pheromone component patterns of moth evolution revealed by computer analysis of the Pherolist. J Anim Ecol 75(2):399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardé RT, Minks AK (1995) Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annu Rev Entomol 40:559–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Varela LG, Smith RJ, Whitmer DR, Simmons GA, Lucchi A, Broadway R, Steinhauer R (2014) Growers, scientists and regulators collaborate on European grapevine moth program. Calif Agric 68(4):125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lame FM, Epstein D, Gut LJ, Goldfarb H, Miller JR (2010) Effect of varying dispenser point source density on mating disruption of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 103(4):1299–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 52:81–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (2016) Efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. Mating disruption pheromones (http://pp1.eppo.int/). First approved in 2008–09. Last update December 2016

  • Gilligan TM, Epstein ME, Passoa SC, Powell JA, Sage OC, Brown JW (2011) Discovery of Lobesia botrana ([Denis & Schiffermüller]) in California: an invasive species new to North America (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Proc Entomol Soc Washington 113(1):14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes RNC, Smagghe G, Stark JD, Desneux N (2016) Pesticide-induced stress in arthropod pests for optimized integrated pest management programs. Ann Rev Entomol 61:43–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gut LJ, Stelinski LL, Thomson DR, Miller JR (2004) Behaviour-modifying chemicals: prospects and constraints in IPM. In: Koul, Dhaliwal, Cuperus (eds) Integrated pest management: potential, constraints, and challenges. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, pp 73–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, Cooper ML, Gilioli G, Baumgärtner J, Duso C (2012) Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.) in California. Agric For Entomol 14(3):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M (2008) Puffers save labor. Good Fruit Grower 59(11):28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi H, Takabe M, Nakamuta K (2016) Mating disruption of a carpenter moth, Cossus insularis (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) in apple orchards with synthetic sex pheromone, and registration of the pheromone as an agrochemical. J Chem Ecol 42(7):606–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel HE (2017) A brief review on Lobesia botrana mating disruption by mechanically distributing and releasing sex pheromones from biodegradable mesofiber dispensers. Biochem Mol Biol J 3:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A (2016) Semiochemical strategies for tortricid moth control in apple orchards and vineyards in Italy. J Chem Ecol 42(7):571–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Anfora G, Tasin M, De Cristofaro A, Witzgall P, Lucchi A (2011) Chemical ecology and management of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Econ Entomol 104(4):1125–1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Bagnoli B, Lucchi A, Veronelli V (2004) Vine moths control by mating disruption in Italy: results and future prospects. Redia 87:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Bagnoli B (2008) Grape areawide pest management in Italy. In: Koul O, Cuperus G, Elliott N (eds) Areawide pest management: theory and implementation. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 208–225

  • Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Varela L G (2012) Grape berry moths in Western European vineyards and their recent movement into the New World. In: N.J. Bostanian et al. (eds) Arthropod management in vineyards: pests, approaches, and future directions, Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4032-7_14

  • Isaacs R, Ulczynski MJ, Wright B, Gut LJ, Miller JR (1999) Performance of the microsprayer with application for pheromone-mediated control of insect pests. J Econ Entomol 92:1157–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight AL (2004) Managing codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with an internal grid of either aerosol puffers or dispenser clusters plus border applications of individual dispensers. J Entomol Soc Br Col 101:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance D, Mastro VB, Cardé RT, Ioriatti C, Lucchi A, Steinhauer R, Simmons G, Cooper M, Varela LG (2015) Report of USDA APHIS international technical working group for the European grapevine moth (EGVM) in California. November 2, 2015, https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/eg_moth/downloads/twg-report-11-2-15.pdf Accessed January 25, 2018

  • Lance DR, Leonard DS, Mastro VC, Walters ML (2016) Mating disruption as a suppression tactic in programs targeting regulated lepidopteran pests in US. J Chem Ecol 42(7):590–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchi A, Benelli G (2018) Towards pesticide-free farming? Sharing needs and knowledge promotes Integrated Pest Management. Environ Sci Poll Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1919-0

  • Lucchi A, Ladurner E, Iodice A, Savino F, Ricciardi R, Cosci F, Conte G, Benelli G (2018) Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers—a green route to manage the European grapevine moth? Environ Sci Poll Res 25:9426–9442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee PS, Gut LJ, Miller JR (2014) Aerosol emitters disrupt codling moth, Cydia pomonella, competitively. Pest Manag Sci 70:1859–1862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee PS, Miller JR, Thomson DR, Gut LJ (2016) Optimizing aerosol dispensers for mating disruption of codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. J Chem Ecol 42:612–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millar JG (2007) Insect pheromones for integrated pest management: promise versus reality. Redia 90:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Gut LJ (2015) Mating disruption for the 21st century: matching technology with mechanism. Environ Entomol 44(3):427–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Gut LJ, De Lame FM, Stelinski LL (2006) Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): case studies. J Chem Ecol 32(10):2115–2143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro-Roldán MA, Gemeno C (2017) Sublethal effects of neonicotinoid insecticide on calling behavior and pheromone production of tortricid moths. J Chem Ecol 43:881–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey HH, Gerber RG (1996) Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication of codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in walnut orchards. Environ Entomol 25:1398–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelinski LL, Gut LJ, Haas M, McGhee P, Epstein D (2007) Evaluation of aerosol devices for simultaneous disruption of sex pheromone communication in Cydia pomonella and Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Pest Sci 80:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suckling DM, Daly JM, Chen X, Karg G (2007) Field electroantennogram and trap assessments of aerosol pheromone dispensers for disrupting mating in Epiphyas postvittana. Pest Manag Sci 63:202–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ting D, Eya DB (2010) Human health risk assessment of Isomate®-EGVM. Report reviewed by the Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency and the California Department of Public Health, pp 39

  • Welter S, Pickel C, Millar J, Cave F, Van Steenwyk R, Dunley J (2005) Pheromone mating disruption offers selective management options for key pests. Calif Agric 59(1):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A (2010) Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. J Chem Ecol 36(1):80–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing the tested dispensers and aerosol devices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Andrea Lucchi, Giuseppe Conte & Giovanni Benelli

  2. CBC Iberia S.A., Av. Diagonal 605, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Paolo Sambado & Anna B. Juan Royo

  3. Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, via San Camillo de Lellis s.n.c., 01100, Viterbo, Italy

    Bruno Bagnoli

  4. The BioRobotics Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy

    Giovanni Benelli

Authors
  1. Andrea Lucchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paolo Sambado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna B. Juan Royo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bruno Bagnoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuseppe Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giovanni Benelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Benelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclaimer

The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is only aimed to provide specific information; it does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the authors’ affiliations.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucchi, A., Sambado, P., Juan Royo, A.B. et al. Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 22196–22204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2341-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2341-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation