Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Template Removal from Molecularly Imprinted Polymers by Pressurized Hot Water Extraction

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An optimal extraction method for the removal of templates from molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) is presented. The extraction method is based on pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). PHWE was evaluated by application to three distinctly colored MIPs for chlorophyll (green), quercetin (yellow) and phthalocynine (dark blue) with subsequent monitoring of template removal and template bleeding by an ultraviolet spectrophotometer. The templates were washed-off and the extraction efficiency (EE) was compared to that of soxhlet and ultrasonic extraction methods. PHWE employed hot water at an optimal temperature of 220 °C, pressure of 50 bars and flow rate of 2 mL min−1 to thoroughly wash-off the respective templates from their MIPs. The EE evaluated for PHWE was over 99.6% for all the MIPs with no subsequent or minimal template bleeding (<0.01%). The washing procedure was simple and relatively fast as it was achieved in 70 min at the most. At 95% confidence level (n = 3), soxhlet and ultrasonic recorded EE that was not significantly different (<94.5% in all cases) from that of PHWE (>99.6% in all cases). Soxhlet and ultrasonic had washing procedures that were slower (over 18 h) and employed large quantities (400 mL) of organic solvents modified with acids. The percentage relative standard deviations (%RSD) for the EE and recovery results were less than 2.3% in all cases indicating the high reproducibility of the method. Overall, the three methods performed comparably in extracting templates. PHWE seems to be the method of choice as it employed water which poses no environmental threat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Sellergren B (2001) In: Sellergren (ed) Molecularly imprinted polymers. Man made mimics of antibodies and their applications in analytical chemistry B, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 305–322

  2. Baggiani C, Anfossi L, Giovannoli C (2008) Analyst 133:719–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. He C, Long Y, Pan J, Li K, Liu F (2007) J Biochem Biophys Methods 70:133–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pichon V (2007) J Chromatogr A 1152:41–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tamayo FG, Turiel E, Martin-Esteban A (2007) J Chromatogr A 1152:32–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander C, Andersson HS, Andersson LI, Ansell RJ, Kirsch N, Nicholls IA, O’Mahony J, Whitcombe MJ (2006) J Mol Recognit 19:106–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin P, Wilson ID, Jones GR, Jones K (1998) In: Hill HM, Wilson ID (eds) Drug development assay approaches including molecular imprinting and biomarkers. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 21–27

  8. Andersson LI, Paprica A, Arvidsson T (1997) Chromatographia 46:57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mullett W, Lai EPC (1998) Anal Chem 70:3636–3641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sellergren B (1994) Anal Chem 66:1578–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moller K, Crescenzi C, Nilsson U (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 378:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellwanger A, Berggren C, Bayoudh S, Crecenzi C, Karlsson L, Owens PK, Ensing K, Cormack P, Sherrington D, Sellergren B (2001) Analyst 126:784–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng-Ju W, Jun Y, Qing-De S, Yun G, Xiao-Lan Z, Ji-Bao C (2007) Chin J Anal Chem 35:484–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Teo CC, Tan SN, Yong JWH, Hew CS, Ong ES (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:2484–2494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner C, Turner P, Jacobson G, Almgren K, Waldeback M, Sjöberg P, Karlsson EN, Markides KE (2006) Green Chem 8:949–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Richter P, Sepulveda B, Oliva R, Calderon K, Seguel R (2003) J Chromatogr A 994:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersson T, Hartonen K, Hyotylainen T, Riekkola ML (2002) Anal Chim Acta 466:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyotylainen T, Andersson T, Hartonen K, Kuosmanen K, Riekkola ML (2000) Anal Chem 72:3070–3076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ong ES, Len SM (2003) Anal Chim Acta 482:81–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ong ES, Cheong JSH, Goh D (2006) J Chromatogr A 1112:92–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Batlokwa BS (2009) In: An ion imprinted polymer for the selective extraction of mercury(II) ions in aqueous media MSc thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, pp 38

  22. Pichon V, Chapuis-Hugon F (2008) Anal Chim Acta 622:48–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Research Foundation of South Africa, Agilent Technologies (USA), UNDP/GEF SGP, Andrew Mellon Foundation and STINT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bareki Shima Batlokwa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batlokwa, B.S., Mokgadi, J., Nyokong, T. et al. Optimal Template Removal from Molecularly Imprinted Polymers by Pressurized Hot Water Extraction. Chromatographia 73, 589–593 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-010-1884-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-010-1884-3

Keywords

Navigation