Abstract
Anairetes alpinus is currently categorized as an endangered species due to range fragmentation and habitat loss across its geographic distribution. Its range is only partially known, and potential effects of future climate change on its distribution have yet to be assessed. Using ecological niche models and future climates information, we assessed the geographic and environmental potential distribution of A. alpinus for the years 2050 and 2070, analyzing effects of habitat loss and the importance of existing protected areas (PAs) across the species’ range. Our ecological niche models predicted a distributional range of ~ 59,000 to ~ 64,400 km2 for the species, extending from northern Peru to northern Bolivia. However, habitat loss led to an important reduction (> 57%) in the current potential suitable areas. On average, the climate change reduced the potential distributional areas by ~ 49% and ~ 61% for 2050 and 2070, respectively. Synergistic effects of climate change and habitat loss are predicted to pose an even greater risk, leading to a net reduction in future potential distributions of over 75%. We also observed a shift of ~ 230 m increase in elevation between the range under present conditions and scenarios for 2050 and 2070. Although PAs were more suitable climatically than surrounding areas, for future scenarios, we observed an important reduction (on average over 25%) of proportion of PAs within the estimated distributional areas, as well as a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in mean habitat suitability values within PAs. Our novel results offer a guide for future integrative studies focused on defining conservation units and ecological corridors across the distribution of many Andean species.
Zusammenfassung
Derzeitige und künftig mögliche Verbreitung des bedrohten Aschenbrust-Meisentyranns (Anairetes alpinus; Sperlingsvögel: Tyrannen) unter globalen Klimaänderungsszenarien
Wegen der Fragmentierung seines Verbreitungsgebiets und des Verlusts an Lebensraum über seine gesamte geographische Verbreitung hinweg wird Anairetes alpinus inzwischen als bedrohte Art eingestuft. Seine Verbreitung ist nur zum Teil bekannt, und mögliche Auswirkungen zukünftiger Klimaveränderungen auf die Verbreitung müssen noch untersucht werden. Mithilfe Ökologischer Nischen-Modelle und auf die Zukunft hochgerechneter Klima-Daten schlossen wir auf die mögliche zukünftige geographische Verbreitung der Art für die Jahre 2050 und 2070; dabei wurden die Effekte des Lebensraumverlusts sowie die Bedeutung der existierenden Schutzgebiete über die gesamte Verbreitung der Art hinweg analysiert. Unser Ökologisches Nischen-Modell sagte für die Art eine Verbreitung von ca. 59.000 bis 64.000 km2, von Nord-Peru bis Nord-Bolivien, vorher. Der Verlust von Lebensraum würde jedoch zu einer bedeutenden Verringerung (> 57%) der derzeit noch geeigneten Besiedlungsgebiete führen. Im Schnitt würde die Klimaänderung die potentiell möglichen Verbreitungsgebiete um ca. 49% (2050), bzw. ca. 61% (2070) verkleinern. Dabei kann man davon ausgehen, dass synergistische Effekte der Klimaveränderung und des Verlusts an Lebensraum ein noch größeres Risiko mit sich brächten, das den Nettorückgang zukünftig möglicher Verbreitungsgebiete auf über 75% steigen ließe. Auf der Basis der derzeitigen Bedingungen und Szenarien errechneten wir für 2050 und 2070 außerdem einen Anstieg von etwa 230 m über der jetzigen Verbreitungshöhe. Obwohl für die zukünftigen Szenarien die Schutzgebiete klimatisch besser geeignet sind als die Umgebung, stellten wir einen bedeutsamen Rückgang (im Schnitt über 25%) der Anteile der Schutzgebiete an den errechneten Verbreitungsgebieten fest sowie einen signifikanten (p > 0,05) Verlust an mittlerer Habitateignung innerhalb der Schutzgebiete. Unsere Ergebnisse können für die Verbreitung vieler Arten in den Anden als Leitfaden für zukünftige, integrative Untersuchungen zur Festlegung von Naturschutzeinheiten und von ökologischen Korridoren dienen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A, Vilela B, Anderson RP (2015) spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38:541–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01132
Alkishe AA, Peterson AT, Samy AM (2017) Climate change influences on the potential geographic distribution of the disease vector tick Ixodes ricinus. PLoS One 12:e0189092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189092
Anderson R, Lew D, Peterson A (2003) Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol Model 162:211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6
Araújo MB, Anderson RP, Barbosa AM, Beale CM, Dormann CF, Early R et al (2019) Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
Atauchi PJ, Peterson AT, Flanagan J (2018) Species distribution models for Peruvian plantcutter improve with consideration of biotic interactions. J Avian Biol 49:e01617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01617
Barnagaud JY, Kissling WD, Tsirogiannis C, Fisikopoulos V, Villéger S, Sekercioglu CH et al (2017) Biogeographical, environmental and anthropogenic determinants of global patterns in bird taxonomic and trait turnover. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:1190–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12629
Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT et al (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Model 222:1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
Bax V, Francesconi W (2019) Conservation gaps and priorities in the Tropical Andes biodiversity hotspot: implications for the expansion of protected areas. J Environ Manag 232:387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.086
BirdLife (2016) Anairetes alpinus. IUCN Red List Threat Species 2016:2019. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22699383A93729059.en(Accessed 22 January)
Bitencourt C, Rapini A, Damascena LS, Junior PDM (2016) The worrying future of the endemic flora of a tropical mountain range under climate change. Flora 218:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2015.11.001
Boria RA, Olson LE, Goodman SM, Anderson RP (2014) Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol Model 275:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 27:597–623
Campbell LP, Luther C, Moo-Llanes D, Ramsey JM, Danis-Lozano R, Peterson AT (2015) Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1098/rstb.2014.0135
Carriker M (1933) Descriptions of new birds from Peru, with notes on other little-known species. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 85:1–38
Carriker M (1935) Descriptions of new birds from Bolivia, with notes on other little-known species. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 87:313–341
Cobos ME, Bosch RA (2018) Recent and future threats to the Endangered Cuban toad Peltophryne longinasus: potential additive impacts of climate change and habitat loss. Oryx 52:116–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
Cobos ME, Peterson AT, Barve N, Osorio-Olvera L (2019) kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7:e6281. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6281
Collevatti RG, Ribeiro MdSL, Diniz Filho JAF, Oliveira GD, Dobrovolski R, Terribile LC (2013) Stability of Brazilian seasonally dry forests under climate change: inferences for long-term conservation. Am J Plant Sci 4:792–805. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.44098
Cotto O, Wessely J, Georges D, Klonner G, Schmid M, Dullinger S et al (2017) A dynamic eco-evolutionary model predicts slow response of alpine plants to climate warming. Nat Commun 8:15399. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15399
Dale VH, Joyce LA, Mcnulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD et al (2001) Climate change and forest disturbances: climate change can affect forests by altering the frequency, intensity, duration, and timing of fire, drought, introduced species, insect and pathogen outbreaks, hurricanes, windstorms, ice storms, or landslides. Bioscience 51:723–734
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol 1:330–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
Engblom G, Chutas CA, Meza GF, Palomino W, Samochuallpa E (2002) The conservation of Polylepis-adapted birds at Abra Málaga, Cuzco, Peru. Cotinga 17:56–59
ESRI (2010) ArcMap 10.0. Environmental System Research Institute, Inc, New York
Feeley KJ, Silman MR (2010) Land-use and climate change effects on population size and extinction risk of Andean plants. Glob Change Biol 16:3215–3222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02197.x
Feeley KJ, Rehm EM, Machovina B (2012) Perspective: the responses of tropical forest species to global climate change: acclimate, adapt, migrate, or go extinct? Front Biogeogr 4:2. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG12621
Fitzpatrick JW (2004) Genus Myiarchus. In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie DA (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 431–441
Fjeldså J (1988) Status of birds of steppe habitats of the Andean zone and Patagonia. ICBP Tech Publ 7:81–95
Fjeldså J, Kessler M (2004) Conservación de la biodiversidad de los bosques de Polylepis de las tierras altas de Bolivia. In: Centro para la Investigación de la Diversidad Cultural y Biológica de los Bosques Pluviales Andinos (DIVA)
Fjeldså J, Kessler M, Engblom G, Driesch P (1996) Conserving the biological diversity of Polylepis woodlands of the highland of Peru and Bolivia: a contribution to sustainable natural resource management in the Andes. Nordeco, Copenhagen
Forero-Medina G, Joppa L, Pimm SL (2011) Constraints to species’ elevational range shifts as climate changes. Conserv Biol 25:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01572.x
Gareca EE, Hermy M, Fjeldså J, Honnay O (2010) Polylepis woodland remnants as biodiversity islands in the Bolivian high Andes. Biodivers Conserv 19:3327–3346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9895-9
GBIF.org (2019) GBIF occurrence Download Anairetes alpinus (Carriker, 1933). https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.qbg2y7
Golicher DJ, Cayuela L, Newton AC (2012) Effects of climate change on the potential species richness of Mesoamerican forests. Biotropica 44:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00815.x
Gosling WD, Hanselman JA, Knox C, Valencia BG, Bush MB (2009) Long-term drivers of change in Polylepis woodland distribution in the central Andes. J Veg Sci 20:1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01102.x
Greeney HF (2013) The nest of the Ash-breasted Tit-tyrant (Anairetes alpinus). Ornitol Colomb 13:74–78
Guevara L, Gerstner BE, Kass JM, Anderson RP (2018) Toward ecologically realistic predictions of species distributions: a cross-time example from tropical montane cloud forests. Glob Change Biol 24:1511–1522. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13992
Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araújo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E et al (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 5:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5%5b131:PANIAC%5d2.0.CO;2
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A et al (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araújo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog Phys Geogr 30:751–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133306071957
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IUCN, UNEP-WCMC (2012) Protected planet—the latest initiative harnessing the World Database on Protected Areas. World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). http://www.protectedplanet.net/. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
Janzen DH (1967) Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am Nat 101:233–249
Josse C, Cuesta F, Navarro G, Barrena V, Cabrera E, Chacón-Moreno E et al (2009) Ecosistemas de los Andes del norte y centro. Secretaría General de la Comunidad Andina, Lima
Kessler M (2006) Bosques de Polylepis. Bot Econ Andes Centrales 11:110–120
Kessler M, Toivonen JM, Sylvester SP, Kluge J, Hertel D (2014) Elevational patterns of Polylepis tree height (Rosaceae) in the high Andes of Peru: role of human impact and climatic conditions. Front Plant Sci 5:194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00194
Li BV, Pimm SL (2016) China’s endemic vertebrates sheltering under the protective umbrella of the giant panda. Conserv Biol 30:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12618
Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
Liu C, White M, Newell G (2013) Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J Biogeogr 40:778–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12058
Lizcano D, Prieto-Torres D, Ortega-Andrade M (2015) Distribución de la danta de montaña (Tapirus pinchaque) en Colombia: importancia de las áreas no protegidas para la conservación en escenarios de cambio climático. In: Payán E, Lasso C, Castaño-Uribe C (eds) Conservación de grandes vertebrados en áreas no protegidas de Colombia, Venezuela y Brasil. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humbolt, Bogotá, pp 115–129
Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (2019) Biodiversity and climate change: transforming the biosphere. Yale University Press, Yale
Malcolm JR, Liu C, Neilson RP, Hansen L, Hannah L (2006) Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol 20:538–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00364.x
Mark BG, Bury J, McKenzie JM, French A, Baraer M (2010) Climate change and tropical Andean glacier recession: evaluating hydrologic changes and livelihood vulnerability in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 100:794–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.497369
Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA (2013) A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36:1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
Merow C, Smith MJ, Edwards TC Jr, Guisan A, Mcmahon SM, Normand S et al (2014) What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models? Ecography 37:1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00845
Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis, vol 821. Wiley, New York
Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375
Morrone JJ (2014) Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1
Mota-Vargas C, Rojas-Soto OR (2012) The importance of defining the geographic distribution of species for conservation: the case of the Bearded Wood-Partridge. J Nat Conserv 20:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2011.07.002
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R (2016). Vegan: community ecology package. R Package (Version 2.3). http://www.worldagroforestry.org/publication/vegan-community-ecology-package-r-package-23. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GV, Underwood EC (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of Life on Earth. A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51:933–938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051%5b0933:TEOTWA%5d2.0.CO;2
Ortega JC, Machado N, Diniz-Filho JAF, Rangel TF, Araújo MB, Loyola R et al (2019) Meta-analyzing the likely cross-species responses to climate change. Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5617
Ortega-Andrade HM, Prieto-Torres D, Gómez-Lora I, Lizcano D (2015) Ecological and geographical analysis of the distribution of the Mountain Tapir (Tapirus pinchaque) in Ecuador: importance of protected areas in future scenarios of global warming. PLoS One 10:e0121137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121137
Owens HL, Campbell LP, Dornak LL, Saupe EE, Barve N, Soberón J et al (2013) Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecol Model 263:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.011
Parker TA, O’neill JP (1980) Notes on little known birds of the upper Urubamba Valley, southern Peru. Auk 97:167–176
Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286
Pauli H, Gottfried M, Reiter K, Klettner C, Grabherr G (2007) Signals of range expansions and contractions of vascular plants in the high Alps: observations (1994–2004) at the GLORIA master site Schrankogel, Tyrol, Austria. Glob Change Biol 13:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01282.x
Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Martinez-Meyer E, Brotons L, McClean C et al (2006) Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. J Biogeogr 33:1704–1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01460.x
Peterson AT (2001) Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 103:599–605. https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103%5b0599:PSGDBO%5d2.0.CO;2
Peterson A, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265–1267. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5431.1265
Peterson AT, Ortega-Huerta MA, Bartley J, Sánchez-Cordero V, Soberón J, Buddemeier RH, Stockwell DR (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416:626. https://doi.org/10.1038/416626a
Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Model 213:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
Peterson AT, Soberon J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M et al (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Peterson AT, Cobos ME, Jiménez-García D (2018a) Major challenges for correlational ecological niche model projections to future climate conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1429:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13873
Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Gordillo A (2018b) Assumption-versus data-based approaches to summarizing species’ ranges. Conserv Biol 32:568–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12801
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J et al (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl 19:181–197. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1
Prieto-Torres DA, Pinilla-Buitrago G (2017) Estimating the potential distribution and conservation priorities of Chironectes minimus (Zimmermann, 1780) (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae). Therya 8:131–144. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-17-478
Prieto-Torres DA, Rojas-Soto OR (2016) Reconstructing the Mexican tropical dry forests via an autoecological niche approach: reconsidering the ecosystem boundaries. PLoS One 11:e0150932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150932
Prieto-Torres DA, Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Santiago-Alarcon D, Rojas-Soto O (2016) Response of the endangered tropical dry forests to climate change and the role of Mexican Protected Areas for their conservation. Glob Change Biol 22:364–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13090
Prieto-Torres DA, Cuervo AM, Bonaccorso E (2018) On geographic barriers and Pleistocene glaciations: tracing the diversification of the Russet-crowned Warbler (Myiothlypis coronata) along the Andes. PLoS One 13:e0191598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191598
Qiao H, Soberón J, Peterson AT (2015) No silver bullets in correlative ecological niche modelling: insights from testing among many potential algorithms for niche estimation. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12397
Quispe-Melgar HR, Romo WCN, Ames-Martínez FN, Paucar VFC, Sevillano-Ríos CS (2018) New distribution records of Anairetes alpinus (Carriker, 1933) (Aves, Tyrannidae), a highly specialized and endangered bird of Polylepis forests in Junín, Peru. Check List 14:499. https://doi.org/10.15560/14.3.499
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Raxworthy CJ, Pearson RG, Rabibisoa N, Rakotondrazafy AM, Ramanamanjato J-B, Raselimanana AP et al (2008) Extinction vulnerability of tropical montane endemism from warming and upslope displacement: a preliminary appraisal for the highest massif in Madagascar. Glob Change Biol 14:1703–1720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01596.x
Renison D, Cingolani A, Suarez R, Menoyo E, Coutsiers C, Sobral A et al (2005) The restoration of degraded mountain woodlands: effects of seed provenance and microsite characteristics on Polylepis australis seedling survival and growth in central Argentina. Restor Ecol 13:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00015.x
Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho C, Chirkov V, Fischer G et al (2011) RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Change 109:33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
Rodrigues AS, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010
Rojas-Soto OR, Sosa V, Ornelas JF (2012) Forecasting cloud forest in eastern and southern Mexico: conservation insights under future climate change scenarios. Biodivers Conserv 21:2671–2690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0327-x
Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01333
Roubicek AJ, VanDerWal J, Beaumont LJ, Pitman AJ, Wilson P, Hughes L (2010) Does the choice of climate baseline matter in ecological niche modelling? Ecol Model 221:2280–2286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.021
Salazar LF, Nobre CA, Oyama MD (2007) Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophys Res Lett 34:L09708. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029695
Saupe EE, Farnsworth A, Lunt DJ, Sagoo N, Pham KV, Field DJ (2019) Climatic shifts drove major contractions in avian latitudinal distributions throughout the Cenozoic. PNAS 116:12895–12900. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903866116
Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Seltmann P, Kessler M (2007) Consequences of the pollination system on genetic structure and patterns of species distribution in the Andean genus Polylepis (Rosaceae): a comparative study. Plant Syst Evol 266:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0543-0
Schnell JK, Harris GM, Pimm SL, Russell GJ (2013) Quantitative analysis of forest fragmentation in the Atlantic Forest reveals more threatened bird species than the current Red List. PLoS One 8:e65357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065357
Servat GP, Mendoza W, Ochoa JA (2002) Flora y fauna de cuatro bosques de Polylepis (Rosaceae) en la Cordillera del Vilcanota (Cusco, Perú). Ecol Aplicada 1:25–35. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v1i1-2.226
Sevillano-Ríos CS, Rodewald AD (2017) Avian community structure and habitat use of Polylepis forests along an elevation gradient. PeerJ 5:e3220. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3220
Soberón J, Nakamura M (2009) Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. PNAS 106:19644–19650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901637106
Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.4
Stoner KE, Timm RM (2011) Seasonally dry tropical forest mammals: adaptations and seasonal patterns. In: Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests: ecology and conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 85–106
Tingley MW, Monahan WB, Beissinger SR, Moritz C (2009) Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. PNAS 106(Suppl 2):19637–19643. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901562106
USGS (2001) HYDRO1k Elevation Derivate Database [Dataset]. Sioux Falls, SD: US Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/HYDRO1K. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
Vergara-Tabares DL, Lammertink M, Verga EG, Schaaf AA, Nori J (2018) Gone with the forest: assessing global woodpecker conservation from land use patterns. Divers Distrib 24:640–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12710
Vogel C, Hennessey A (2002) Discovery of a new site for Ash-breasted Tit-tyrant Anairetes alpinus in Bolivia. Cotinga 17:80
Wei T, Simko V (2017) R package “corrplot”: visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84). https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot. Accessed 15 Mar 2019
Wood SN (2001) mgcv: GAMs and generalized ridge regression for R. R news 1:20–25
Zutta BR, Rundel PW, Saatchi S, Casana JD, Gauthier P, Soto A, Velazco Y, Buermann W (2012) Predicting Polylepis distribution: vulnerable and increasingly important Andean woodlands. Rev Peru Biol 19:205–212
Acknowledgements
The first author (PJA) extends his gratitude to the Museo de Historia Natural de Cusco and Asociacion Ecosistemas Andinos Andinos (ECOAN). DAP-T extends his gratitude to Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation for a scholarship during the course “Spatial Ecology, Geospatial Analysis and Remote Sensing for Conservation (MCCS 0500)” that provided tools and skills necessary for our spatial analysis. This manuscript was improved by comments (including the reviewed translation) from Denisse Spaan, Cristina Vallejos, A. Townsend Peterson, Lynna Kiere, and three anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PJAR and DAP-T: conceived and designed the study; PJAR, CAC, and GF: compiled the database of available records and performed the fieldwork; PJAR and DAP-T: performed the ecological niche models and developed spatial analyses. All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of results and the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Additional information
Communicated by J. T. Lifjeld.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atauchi, P.J., Aucca-Chutas, C., Ferro, G. et al. Present and future potential distribution of the endangered Anairetes alpinus (Passeriformes: Tyrannidae) under global climate change scenarios. J Ornithol 161, 723–738 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01762-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01762-z