Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long after the event, or four things we (should) know about bird invasions

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most significant single event in the study of alien bird invasions occurred in 1981, with the publication of John L. Long’s seminal book “ Introduced birds of the world” (full title: Introduced birds of the world: The worldwide history, distribution and influence of birds introduced to new environments”; David & Charles Ltd., Newton Abbot, UK). The significance of this book derives not just from its content, but also from its timing, coincident with the 1982 Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) programme on the ecology of biological invasions. It was not long before studies started to appear that exploited the data in Long’s book to address the questions posed by SCOPE regarding alien invasions. As a result, we arguably have a more complete understanding of the invasion process for birds than for any other taxon. Nevertheless, there are still some key issues in the study of bird invasions where understanding is not all it should be. The aim of this review is to highlight four of these issues by arguing that (1) we do not know half so much about bird invasions as we think; (2) propagule pressure promotes invasions; (3) colonization pressure matters; (4) there is no evidence that escape from parasites promotes alien (bird) invasions. We expect some of the views expressed to be controversial, and others less so, but either way we hope this paper will stimulate others to provide better evidence for—or against—our propositions.

Zusammenfassung

Der wichtigste Moment in der Erforschung der Vogelinvasionen war das Erscheinen John L. Long’s Buches „Eingeführte Vögel der Welt“ 1981 [Titel in Englisch: Introduced birds of the world: The worldwide history, distribution and influence of birds introduced to new environments”; David & Charles Ltd., Newton Abbot, UK]. Die Bedeutsamkeit dieses Buches ist nicht nur dem Inhalt geschuldet, sondern auch dem Zeitpunkt. 1982 begann der wissenschaftliche Beirat der Umweltprobleme [Englisch: Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE)] mit seinem Programm über die Ökologie biologischer Invasionen. Kurz danach erschienen die ersten Studien, die Long‘s Daten nutzten um einige der Fragen zu biologischen Invasionen aus dem SCOPE Programm zu beantworten. Auch resultierend daraus haben wir heute unbestreitbar ein weitaus tieferes Verständnis der Invasionsprozesse von Vögeln als für irgendeine andere Artengruppe. Trotz allem gibt es immer noch Lücken im Verständnis von Vogelinvasionen. Das Ziel dieser Übersichtsarbeit ist es vier dieser Lücken zu adressieren, indem wir argumentieren, dass (1) nur halb so viel über Vogelinvasionen wissen, als wir denken; (2) Propagulendruck Invasionen unterstützt; (3) Kolonisierungsdruck eine Rolle spielt; (4) es keine Beweise gibt, dass die Abwesenheit von Parasiten(Vogel-)Invasionen unterstützt. Wir hoffen, dass unsere mehr oder weniger kontroversen Ansichten andere Forscher anregen weitere Beweise für oder gegen unsere Behauptungen zu liefern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf FW, Luikart GH, Aitken SN (2012) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Duncan RP (2001) Establishment patterns of exotic birds are constrained by non-random patterns in introduction. J Biogeogr 28:927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P (2009a) Avian invasions. The ecology and evolution of exotic birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P (2009b) Following birds along the pathway to invasion. The Biologist 56:80–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Prowse TAA, Lockwood JL, Cassey P (2011a) Passerine introductions to New Zealand support a positive effect of propagule pressure on establishment success. Biodivers Conserv 20:2189–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011b) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Prowse TAA, Lockwood JL, Cassey P (2013) Propagule pressure as a driver of establishment success in deliberately introduced exotic species: fact or artefact? Biol Invasions 15:1459–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett MT (2004) When is correlation between non-independent variables “spurious”? Oikos 105:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1989) Patterns, modes and extents of invasions by vertebrates. In: Drake JA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions, a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 85–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427:731–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P (2002) Life history and ecology influences establishment success of introduced land birds. Biol J Linn Soc 76:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Sol D, Duncan RP, Lockwood JL (2004) Introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B [Suppl] 271:S405–S408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Duncan RP, Lockwood JL (2005) Lessons from the establishment of exotic species: a meta-analytical case study using birds. J Anim Ecol 74:250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:1023–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney R, Jepson P (2006) The international wild bird trade: what’s wrong with blanket bans? Oryx 40:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby AW (1993) Ecological imperialism: the biological expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JC (1984) A statistical analysis of species characteristics affecting the success of bird introductions. BSc Thesis, University of York, York

  • Drake JA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) (1989) Biological invasions, a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Sol D (2003) The ecology of bird introductions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Rossinelli S, Bacher S (2014) Quantifying invasion risk: the relationship between establishment probability and founding population size. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1255–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton C (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan (EAST) (2009) The investigation of prayer animal releases in Taiwan. Environment and Animal Society of Taiwan, Taiwan. Available at http://www.east.org.tw/that_content.php?s_id=14&m_id=0&id=89

  • Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2011) International trade in wild birds, and related bird movements, in Latin America and the Caribbean. Animal Production and Health Paper No. 166, FAO, Rome

  • Fox GA (2005) Extinction risk of heterogeneous populations. Ecology 86:1191–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Bacher S, Kobelt M, Pascal M, Scalera R (2009) Alien mammals of Europe. In: DAISIE (ed) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 119–128

  • Hayes KR, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Invasions 10:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit, van der Putten WH (2010) Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 25:512–519

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2014) IUCN Red list of threatened species. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org

  • Jepson P, Ladle RJ (2005) Bird-keeping in Indonesia: conservation impacts and the potential for substitution-based conservation responses. Oryx 39:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerde CL, Lewis MA (2007) Waiting for invasions: a framework for the arrival of nonindigenous species. Am Nat 170:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kark S, Solarz W, Chiron F, Clergeau P, Shirley S (2009) Alien birds, amphibians and reptiles of Europe. In: DAISIE (ed) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 105–118

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Williams N, Tibanyenda RK (eds) (1996) The live bird trade in Tanzania. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Predicting invasions: propagule pressure and the gravity of Allee effects. Ecology 85:1651–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lever C (2005) Naturalised birds of the world. T & AD Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Jiang Z (2014) International trade of CITES listed bird species in China. PLoS ONE 9:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S-H, Yeung CK-L, Han L, Le MH, Wang C et al (2010) Genetic introgression between an introduced babbler, the Chinese hwamei Leucodioptron c. canorum, and the endemic Taiwan hwamei L. taewanus: a multiple marker systems analysis. J Avian Biol 41:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL (1999) Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: relative importance of transport and establishment. Conserv Biol 13:560–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 15:904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JL (1981) Introduced birds of the world. The worldwide history, distribution and influence of birds introduced to new environments. David & Charles, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invisibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawson J (2003) Prologue to the introduction. In: Long JL (ed) Introduced mammals of the world. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowall RM (1994) On size and growth in freshwater fish. Ecol Freshw Fish 3:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, Maron JL, Morris WF, Parker IM, Power AG et al (2006) Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:726–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP (1993) The all-or-none pattern in introduced Hawaiian passeriforms: the role of competition sustained. Am Nat 141:105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP, Cropper WP Jr (2014) Establishment success in introduced passeriforms of New Zealand: evidence for a Franklin Delano Roosevelt effect. Biol Invasions 16:233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP, Pimm SL (1983) The introduced Hawaiian avifauna: biogeographic evidence for competition. Am Nat 121:669–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP, Cropper WP Jr, Avery ML, Moulton LE (2010) The earliest house sparrow introductions to North America. Biol Invasions 12:2955–2958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP, Cropper WP Jr, Avery ML (2011) A reassessment of the role of propagule pressure in influencing fates of passerine introductions to New Zealand. Biodivers Conserv 20:607–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton M, Cropper WP Jr, Moulton LE, Avery ML, Peacock D (2012a) A reassessment of historical records of avian introductions to Australia: no case for propagule pressure. Biodivers Conserv 21:155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP, Cropper WP Jr, Avery ML (2012b) Historical records of passerine introductions to New Zealand fail to support the propagule pressure hypothesis. Biodivers Conserv 21:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton MP, Cropper WP Jr, Avery ML (2013) Is propagule size the critical factor in predicting introduction outcomes in passeriform birds? Biol Invasions 15:1449–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipek P, Pyšek P, Blackburn TM (2014) How the Yellowhammer became a Kiwi: the history of an alien invasion revealed. NeoBiota 24:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regueira RFS, Bernard E (2012) Wildlife sinks: quantifying the impact of illegal bird trade in street markets in Brazil. Biol Conserv 149:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roques A, Rabitsch W, Rasplus J-Y, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Nentwig W, Kenis M (2009) Alien terrestrial invertebrates of Europe. In: DAISIE (ed) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 63–80

  • Roy HE, Peyton J, Aldridge DC, Bantock T, Blackburn TM, Bishop J, Britton R, Clark P, Cook E, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Dines T, Dobson M, Edwards F, Harrower C, Harvey MC, Minchin D, Noble DG, Parrott D, Pocock MJO, Preston CD, Roy S, Salisbury A, Schönrogge K, Sewell J, Shaw RH, Stebbing P, Stewart AJA, Walker KJ (2014) Horizon-scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain. Glob Change Biol 20:3859–3871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severinghaus LL (2007) The breeding ecology and dispersal of Taiwan and light-vented bulbuls in Kenting National Park. J Natl Park 17:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh B-S, Lin Y-H, Lee T-W, Chang C-C, Cheng K-T (2006) Pet trade as sources of introduced bird species in Taiwan. Taiwania 51:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2011) Charles Elton: neither founder nor siren, but prophet. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology. The legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley, Oxford, pp 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sol D (2000) Are islands more susceptible to be invaded than continents? Birds say no. Ecography 23:687–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5460–5465

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Maspons J, Vall-llosera M, Bartomeus I, García-Peña GE, Piñol J, Freckleton RP (2012) Unraveling the life history of successful invaders. Science 337:580–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2014) Patterns of non-randomness in the composition and characteristics of the Taiwanese bird trade. Biol Invasions 16. doi:10.1007/s10530-014-0686-1

  • Thomson GM (1922) The naturalisation of plants and animals in New Zealand. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, McKenzie VJ, Kuris AM (2003) Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421:628–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2009) Release from foliar and floral fungal pathogen species does not explain the geographic spread of naturalized North American plants in Europe. J Ecol 97:385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M (2010) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol Lett 13:947–958

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal MI, Browne M, MacKinnon K, Noble I (2008) The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biol Invasions 10:391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson MH, Kornberg H, Holdgate MW, Gray AJ, Conway GR (1986) Preface: the British contribution to the SCOPE program on the ecology of biological invasions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 314:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao C-T (2007) The elimination and caged raise of exotic Red-billed blue magpie Urocissa erythrorhyncha in Wu-ling National Forest Recreation Area. Endemic Species Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan/Wu-ling National Forest Recreation Area, Taiwan

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the organizing committee of the 26th International Ornithological Congress for the opportunity to present our work, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. This study was supported by the King Saud University Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (TMB), and by an ARC Discovery Grant (DP140102319) and Future Fellowship (FT0991420) to PC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim M. Blackburn.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Matthysen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blackburn, T.M., Dyer, E., Su, S. et al. Long after the event, or four things we (should) know about bird invasions. J Ornithol 156 (Suppl 1), 15–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1155-z

Keywords

Navigation