Skip to main content
Log in

Biological control of apple crown gall by nonpathogenic Rhizobium vitis strain VAR03-1

  • Disease Control
  • Published:
Journal of General Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A nonpathogenic strain of Rhizobium vitis, VAR03-1, was tested as a biological control agent for crown gall of apple. When apple tree roots were soaked in a cell suspension of antagonists before planting in the field, treatment with VAR03-1 significantly reduced the number of plants with tumors and the disease severity. The inhibitory effects of treatment with VAR03-1 and the nonpathogenic R. rhizogenes strain K84, which is commercially used as a biological control agent throughout the world, on apple crown gall were almost identical. VAR03-1 was bacteriocinogenic, producing a halo of inhibition against two species of tumorigenic Rhizobium isolated from galled apple trees. Moreover, VAR03-1 established populations on roots of apple tree rootstock and persisted on roots for 437 days. This is the first report that the nonpathogenic R. vitis VAR03-1 effectively controls crown gall of apple.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouzar H, Chilton WS, Nesme X, Dessaux Y, Vaudequin V, Petit A, Jones JB, Hodge NC (1995) A new Agrobacterium strain isolated from aerial tumors on Ficus benjamina L. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:65–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burr TJ, Katz BH (1983) Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 from grapevine galls and sap, and from vineyard soil. Phytopathology 73:163–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr TJ, Reid CL (1994) Biological control of grape crown gall with non-tumorigenic Agrobacterium vitis F2/5. Am J Enol Vitic 45:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr TJ, Reid CL, Tagliati E, Bazzi C, Süle S (1997) Biological control of grape crown gall by strain F2/5 is not associated with agrocin production or competition for attachment sites on grape cells. Phytopathology 87:706–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton MD, Drummond MH, Merlo DJ, Sciaky D, Montoya AL, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1977) Stable incorporation of plasmid DNA into higher plant cells: the molecular basis of crown gall tumorigenesis. Cell 11:263–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis HJ, Hattingh MJ, Van Vuuren HJJ (1985) Biological control of crown gall in South Africa by Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84. Plant Dis 69:302–305

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Fiki F, Giles KL (1981) Agrobacterium tumefaciens in agriculture and research. In: Giles KL, Atherly AG (eds) Biology of the rhizobiaceae. International review of cytology supplement 13, Academic Press, New York, pp 47–58

  • Jones DA, Kerr A (1989) Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K1026, a genetically engineered derivative of strain K84, for biological control of crown gall. Plant Dis 73:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi A (2009) Studies on the diagnosis and biological control of grapevine crown gall and phylogenetic analysis of tumorigenic Rhizobium vitis. J Gen Plant Pathol 75:462–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi A (2011) Genetic diversity of Rhizobium vitis strains in Japan based on multilocus sequence analysis using the sequences of pyrG, recA and rpoD. J Gen Plant Pathol 77:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi A, Inoue K, Nasu H (2005) Inhibition of crown gall formation by Agrobacterium radiobacter biovar 3 strains isolated from grapevine. J Gen Plant Pathol 71:422–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi A, Inoue K, Nasu H (2007) Biological control of grapevine crown gall by nonpathogenic Agrobacterium vitis strain VAR03-1. J Gen Plant Pathol 73:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi A, Inoue K, Ichinose Y (2008a) Biological control of crown gall of grapevine, rose, and tomato by nonpathogenic Agrobacterium vitis strain VAR03-1. Phytopathology 98:1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi A, Sawada H, Ichinose Y (2008b) Phylogenetic and serological analyses reveal genetic diversity of Agrobacterium vitis strains in Japan. Plant Pathol 57:747–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr A (1980) Biological control of crown gall through production of agrocin 84. Plant Dis 64:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersters K, De Ley J (1984) Genus III. Agrobacterium Conn 1942. In: Kring NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 1. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, pp 244–254

  • Makino T (1986) Biological control of crown gall by Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84 (in Japanese). Shokubutsu Boeki [Plant Protection] 40:540–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore LW, Warren G (1979) Agrobacterium radiobacter strain 84 and biological control of crown gall. Ann Rev Phytopathol 17:163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophel K, Kerr A (1990) Agrobacterium vitis sp. nov. for strains of Agrobacterium biovar 3 from grapevines. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:236–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penyalver R, López MM (1999) Cocolonization of the rhizosphere by pathogenic Agrobacterium strains and nonpathogenic strains K84 and K1026, used for crown gall biocontrol. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1936–1940

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penyalver R, Vicedo B, López MM (2000) Use of the genetically engineered Agrobacterium strain K1026 for biological control of crown gall. Eur J Plant Pathol 16:801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader JS, Ordoukhanian PT, Kim JG, de Crécy-Lagard V, Hwang I, Farrand S, Schimmel P (2005) Major biocontrol of plant tumors targets tRNA synthetase. Science 309:1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawada H, Ieki H, Oyaizu H, Matsumoto S (1993) Proposal for rejection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and revised descriptions for the genus Agrobacterium and for Agrobacterium radiobacter and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:694–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schilperoot RA (1972) Integration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA in the genome of crown gall tumor cells and its expression. In: Maas Geesteranus HP (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on plant pathogenic bacteria. Centre for Agricultural Publishing And Documentation, Wageningen, pp 223–238

  • Stockwell VO, Moore LW, Loper JE (1993) Fate of Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:2112–2120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young JM, Kuykendall LD, Martínez-Romero E, Kerr A, Sawada H (2001) A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:89–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young JM, Kerr A, Sawada H (2005) Genus II. Agrobacterium. In: Garrity GM (ed) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2, part C, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 340–345

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Drs. K. Suzaki (Grape and Persimmon Research Station, National Institute of Fruit Tree Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Higashi-hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan) and T. Makino (formerly Shizuoka Agricultural Experiment Station, Shizuoka, Japan), who supplied some of the strains used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Kawaguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawaguchi, A., Kondo, Ki. & Inoue, K. Biological control of apple crown gall by nonpathogenic Rhizobium vitis strain VAR03-1. J Gen Plant Pathol 78, 287–293 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-012-0388-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-012-0388-4

Keywords

Navigation