Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unexpected control of soil carbon turnover by soil carbon concentration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Chemistry Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soils are a key component of the terrestrial carbon cycle as they contain the majority of terrestrial carbon. Soil microorganisms mainly control the accumulation and loss of this carbon. However, traditional concepts of soil carbon stabilisation failed so far to account for environmental and energetic constraints of microorganisms. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that these biological limitations might have the overall control on soil carbon stability. In a long-term experiment, we incubated 13C-labelled compost with natural soils at various soil carbon concentrations. Unexpectedly, we found that soil carbon turnover decreased with lower carbon concentration. We developed a conceptual model that explained these observations. In this model, two types of particles were submitted to random walk movement in the soil profile: soil organic matter substrate and microbial decomposers. Soil carbon turnover depended only on the likelihood of a decomposer particle to meet a substrate particle; in consequence, carbon turnover decreased with lower carbon concentration, like observed in the experiment. This conceptual model was able to simulate realistic depth profiles of soil carbon and soil carbon age. Our results, which are simply based on the application of a two-step kinetic, unmystify the stability of soil carbon and suggest that observations like high carbon ages in subsoil, stability of carbon in fallows and priming of soil carbon might be simply explained by the probability to be decomposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8(6):626–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume HP et al (2010) Scheffer/schachtschabel: lehrbuch der bodenkunde. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg 569 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2010) Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, USA

  • Bryant D, Nielson D, Tangley L (1997) The last frontier forests. World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG, Wood S (2005) Current state and trends: cultivated systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) The millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, pp 747–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou WW, Silver WL, Jackson RD, Thompson AW, Allen-Diaz B (2008) The sensitivity of annual grassland carbon cycling to the quantity and timing of rainfall. Glob Change Biol 14(6):1382–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA, Luo YQ (2006) On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q(10). Glob Change Biol 12(2):154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Samanta S, Caramori SS, Savage K (2012) The dual arrhenius and Michaelis–Menten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales. Glob Change Biol 18(1):371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries RS, Field CB, Fung I, Collatz GJ, Bounoua L (1999) Combining satellite data and biogeochemical models to estimate global effects of human-induced land cover change on carbon emissions and primary productivity. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:803–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschesne A, Pallud C, Grundmann GL (2007) Spatial distribution of bacteria at the microscale in soil. In: Franklin R, Mills A (eds) The spatial distribution of microbes in the environment. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Don A, Schumacher J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scholten T, Schulze E-D (2007) Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites—implications for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma 141(3–4):272–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Don A, Schumacher J, Freibauer A (2011) Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks—a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 17:1658–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungait JAJ, Hopkins DW, Gregory AS, Whitmore AP (2012) Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob Change Biol 18(6):1781–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekschmitt K, Liu MQ, Vetter S, Fox O, Wolters V (2005) Strategies used by soil biota to overcome soil organic matter stability—why is dead organic matter left over in the soil? Geoderma 128(1–2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English BP et al (2006) Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis–Menten equation revisited. Nat Chem Biol 2(2):87–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Strickland MS, Liptzin D, Bradford MA, Cleveland CC (2009) Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecol Lett 12(11):1238–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine S et al (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450(7167):277–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster RC (1988) Microenvironments of soil-microorganisms. Biol Fertil Soils 6(3):189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin RB, Mills AL (2003) Multi-scale variation in spatial heterogeneity for microbial community structure in an eastern Virginia agricultural field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44(3):335–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmanov TG, Parton WJ, Ojima DS (1997) Testing the ‘CENTURY’ ecosystem level model on data sets from eight grassland sites in the former USSR representing a wide climatic/soil gradient. Ecol Model 96:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleixner G (2013) Soil organic matter dynamics: a biological perspective derived from the use of compound-specific isotopes studies. Ecol Res doi: 10.1007/s11284-012-1022-9

  • Gleixner G, Bol R, Balesdent J (1999) Molecular insight into soil carbon turnover. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 13(13):1278–1283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleixner G, Czimczik CJ, Kramer C, Lühker B, Schmidt MWI (2001) Plant compounds and their turnover and stabilization as soil organic matter. In: Schulze ED (ed) Global biogeochemical cycles in the climate system. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 201–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gude A, Kandeler E, Gleixner G (2012) Input related microbial carbon dynamic of soil organic matter in particle size fractions. Soil Biol Biochem 47:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (2005) Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: an overview, advances in agronomy, vol 85., Advances in agronomy. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 221–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim A, Schmidt MWI (2007) Lignin turnover in arable soil and grassland analysed with two different labelling approaches. Eur J Soil Sci 58(3):599–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemeyer O, Insam H, Kaiser EA, Walenzik G (1989) Soil microbial biomass and respiration measurements—an automated technique based in infrared gas-analysis. Plant Soil 116(2):191–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000) IPCC special report on land use, land-use change and forestry. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Hart PBS, Rayner JH, Parry LC (1987) Modelling the turnover of organic matter in long-term experiments at Rothamsted. INTECOL Bull 15:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmitt SJ et al (2008) Mineralization of native soil organic matter is not regulated by the size, activity or composition of the soil microbial biomass—a new perspective. Soil Biol Biochem 40:61–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koch HJ, Stockfisch N (2006) Loss of soil organic matter upon ploughing under a loess soil after several years of conservation tillage. Soil Tillage Res 86(1):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y (2002) Review: factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenernahrung Bodenkunde 165(4):382–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Solomon D (2007) Organic matter stabilization in soil microaggregates: implications from spatial heterogeneity of organic carbon contents and carbon forms. Biogeochemistry 85(1):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J et al (2008) Spatial complexity of soil organic matter forms at nanometre scales. Nat Geosci 1(4):238–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner B et al (2008) How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171(1):91–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis L, Menten ML (1913) Die kinetik der invertinwirkung. Biochemische Zeitschrift 49:333–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder R, Richter J (2000) C and N accumulation in arable soils of West Germany and its influence on the environment—developments 1970–1998. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163(1):65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan N, Wu KJ, Young IM, Crawford JW, Ritz K (2003) Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44(2):203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietramellara G, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Renella G (2002) Soil as a biological system. Annals of Microbiology 52(2):119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeplau C, Don A, Vesterdal L, Leifeld J, Van Wesemael B, Schumacher J, Gensior A (2011) Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone–carbon response functions as a model approach. Glob Change Biol 17:2415–2427

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubino M et al (2010) Carbon input belowground is the major C flux contributing to leaf litter mass loss: evidences from a C-13 labelled-leaf litter experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 42(7):1009–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumpel C, Koegel-Knabner I (2011) Deep soil organic matter-a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant Soil 338(1–2):143–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MWI et al (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478(7367):49–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeiss S et al (2008a) Plant diversity positively affects short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Glob Change Biol 14(12):2937–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeiss S, Temperton VM, Gleixner G (2008b) Mechanisms of short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 40(10):2634–2642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torn MS, Trumbore SE, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Hendricks DM (1997) Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389(6647):170–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walter NG (2006) Michaelis–Menten is dead, long live Michaelis–Menten! Nat Chem Biol 2(2):66–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White D (2000) The physiology and biochemistry of prokaryotes. University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Young IM, Crawford JW (2004) Interactions and self-organization in the soil–microbe complex. Science 304(5677):1634–1637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Andrea Oehns-Rittgerodt for technical help with the incubation experiment and Jens Schumacher for helping with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerd Gleixner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Don, A., Rödenbeck, C. & Gleixner, G. Unexpected control of soil carbon turnover by soil carbon concentration. Environ Chem Lett 11, 407–413 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-013-0433-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-013-0433-3

Keywords

Navigation