Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment tools for social cognition in epilepsy

Instrumente zur Beurteilung sozialer Kognition bei Epilepsie

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Epileptologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social cognition enables us to interact with other individuals and socio-cognitive functions are of importance throughout life. In people with focal and idiopathic epilepsies, previous research has shown that possible impairments in social cognition may cause interpersonal problems and have a negative impact on quality of life. For this reason, the assessment of socio-cognitive functions in individuals with epilepsy might help to identify individuals at risk and to define targets for intervention. Yet, previous tests were limited to static images and text-based material lacking ecological validity. Therefore, we have developed a novel test battery that aims at a comprehensive understanding of social cognition and uses highly ecologic tasks based on dynamic and multimodal stimulus material. Preliminary results that were obtained with the test battery are outlined in this overview.

Zusammenfassung

Soziale Kognition ermöglicht es uns, mit anderen Menschen zu interagieren, und ist während des gesamten Lebens von Bedeutung. Bei Menschen mit fokalen und idiopathischen Epilepsien haben bisherige Untersuchungen gezeigt, dass mögliche Beeinträchtigungen der sozialen Kognition zwischenmenschliche Schwierigkeiten verursachen und sich negativ auf die Lebensqualität auswirken können. Aus diesem Grund kann die Untersuchung von soziokognitiven Funktionen bei Personen mit Epilepsie dazu beitragen, Personen mit einem erhöhten Risiko für soziokognitive Defizite zu identifizieren und Interventionsziele abzuleiten. Bisherige Tests beschränkten sich jedoch auf die Verwendung von statischen Bildern und textbasiertem Material mit geringer ökologischer Validität. Deshalb haben die AutorInnen eine neue Testbatterie entwickelt, die ein umfassendes Verständnis der sozialen Kognition zum Ziel hat und dafür ökologische Aufgaben auf Basis von dynamischem und multimodalem Stimulusmaterial nutzt. Vorläufige Ergebnisse, die bereits mit der Testbatterie erhoben werden konnten, werden in diesem Übersichtsartikel präsentiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchell RL, Phillips LH (2015) The overlapping relationship between emotion perception and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia 70:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherman E (2009) Maximizing quality of life in people living with epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci 36:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bora E, Meletti S (2016) Social cognition in temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav 60:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Monti G, Meletti S (2015) Emotion recognition in temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 55:280–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arsalidou M, Morris D, Taylor MJ (2011) Converging evidence for the advantage of dynamic facial expressions. Brain Topogr 24(2):149–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry JD, Von Hippel W, Molenberghs P, Lee T, Sachdev PS (2016) Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 12(1):28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT (1998) Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 10(5):640–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Steiger BK, Jokeit H (2017) Why epilepsy challenges social life. Seizure 44:194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanley DA, Adolphs R (2013) Toward a neural basis for social behavior. Neuron 80(3):816–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Langner O, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DH, Hawk ST, Van Knippenberg AD (2010) Presentation and validation of the Radboud faces database. Cogn Emot 24(8):1377–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekman P (1992) Are there basic emotions? Psychol Rev 99(3):550–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy S, Roy C, Éthier-Majcher C, Fortin I, Belin P, Gosselin F (2007) STOIC: a database of dynamic and static faces expressing highly recognizable emotions. http://mapageweb.umontreal.ca/gosselif/sroyetal_sub.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goeleven E, De Raedt R, Leyman L, Verschuere B (2008) The Karolinska directed emotional faces: a validation study. Cogn Emot 22(6):1094–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burkhardt F, Paeschke A, Rolfes M, Sendlmeier WF, Weiss B (2005) A database of German emotional speech. In Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. http://www.database.syntheticspeech.de/databaseOfGermanEmotionalSpeech.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mutschler D (2010) Funktionelle Neuroanatomie ironischer Sprache: Zum Einfluss des Persönlichkeitsmerkmals Schizotypie auf die Sprachperzeption. Dissertation. https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10900/45656/pdf/Dissertation_Final_26_05_2010_zum_Druck_4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 1 May 2019

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dziobek I, Fleck S, Kalbe E et al (2006) Introducing MASC: a movie for the assessment of social cognition. J Autism Dev Disord 36(5):623–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sullivan GM, Feinn R (2012) Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 4(3):279–282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Szemere E, Jokeit H (2015) Quality of life is social—towards an improvement of social abilities in patients with epilepsy. Seizure 26:12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Bauer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J. Bauer, L.C. Kegel, B.K. Steiger, and H. Jokeit declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauer, J., Kegel, L.C., Steiger, B.K. et al. Assessment tools for social cognition in epilepsy. Z. Epileptol. 32, 183–186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-019-0260-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-019-0260-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation