Abstract
The International GNSS Service aims to provide combined satellite clock and code/phase bias products in the recent third reprocessing campaign (Repro3) to enable more robust ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning (PPP-AR). However, the interoperability of the code/phase bias products from different analysis centers (ACs) was seriously corrupted by their inconsistent corrections of GPS Block III and Galileo satellite antenna phase center (APC) effects. To achieve a sufficient and rapid reconciliation among the Repro3 bias products, we correct efficiently only for the antenna phase center offsets in the radial direction (i.e., z-PCOs), rather than ask each AC to reprocess their 25 years of products by strictly correcting for APC effects repeatedly. A clock/bias combination for 2020 demonstrates that our approximate APC correction significantly reduces the inconsistency among ACs’ satellite clock/bias products. The mean residuals from the combination of differential code biases and wide-lane phase biases are within 0.1 ns and 0.03 cycles, respectively. A 30-day PPP-AR test using GPS and Galileo data from 90 stations shows that our combination clock/bias products can still guarantee a wide-lane ambiguity fixing rate that differs by less than 0.5% from that resulting from APC strictly corrected combination products.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The IGS repro3 products and GNSS observations used in this study can be accessed publicly at https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/gnss/products/repro3/ and https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/gps/data/daily/. The Repro3 combination products with approximate APC corrections applied are labeled as “IGS2R03FIN” therein (see IGSMAIL-8248). The open-source PRIDE PPP-AR v2.2 software package can be downloaded at https://github.com/PrideLab/PRIDE-PPPAR/.
Abbreviations
- AC:
-
(Analysis center)
- ANTEX:
-
(Antenna Exchange)
- APC:
-
(Antenna phase center)
- BDS:
-
(Beidou navigation satellite system)
- CNES:
-
(Centre National d’Études Spatiales)
- CODE:
-
(Center for Orbit Determination in Europe)
- DCB:
-
(Differential code bias)
- FOC:
-
(Full Operational Capability)
- GF:
-
(Geometry-free)
- GNSS:
-
(Global navigation satellite system)
- GPS:
-
(Global positioning system)
- HMW:
-
(Hatch–Melbourne–Wübbena)
- IF:
-
(Ionospheric-free)
- IGS:
-
(The International GNSS Service)
- IOV:
-
(In-Orbit Validation)
- LOS:
-
(Line-of-sight)
- NRCan:
-
(Natural Resources Canada)
- OSB:
-
(Observable-specific bias)
- PCO:
-
(Phase center offset)
- PCV:
-
(Phase center variation)
- PPP-AR:
-
(Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution)
- Repro3:
-
(The third reprocessing campaign)
- RMS:
-
(Root mean square)
- STD:
-
(Standard deviation)
- TUG:
-
(Technical University of Graz)
- UPD:
-
(Uncalibrated phase delay)
- WHU:
-
(Wuhan University)
- WL:
-
(Wide-lane)
References
Banville S, Geng J, Loyer S, Schaer S, Springer T, Strasser S (2020) On the interoperability of IGS products for precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution. J Geod 94(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01335-w
Cardellach E, Elósegui P, Davis JL (2007) Global distortion of GPS networks associated with satellite antenna model errors. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 112(7):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004675
Collins P, Bisnath S, Lahaye F, Héroux P (2010) Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing. Navigation 57(2):123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2010.tb01772.x
Dach R, Selmke I, Villiger A, Arnold D, Prange L, Schaer S, Sidorov D, Stebler P, Jäggi A, Hugentobler U (2021) Review of recent GNSS modelling improvements based on CODEs Repro3 contribution. Adv Sp Res 68(3):1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.04.046
Dilssner F (2010) GPS IIF-1 Satellite Antenna Phase Center and Attitude Modeling. Inside GNSS 5(6):59–64
Dilssner F, Springer T, Enderle W, Office NS (2016) Evaluating the pre-flight GPS Block IIR/IIR-M antenna phase pattern measurements. In: IGS Workshop 2016. Sydney, Australia, 8–12 Feb
European GNSS Agency (2017) Galileo Satellite Metadata. https://www.gsc-europa.eu/support-to-developers/galileo-satellite-metadata.
Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4
Geng J, Teferle FN, Shi C, Meng X, Dodson AH, Liu J (2009) Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data. GPS Solut 13(4):263–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0119-2
Geng J, Shi C, Ge M, Dodson AH, Lou Y, Zhao Q, Liu J (2012) Improving the estimation of fractional-cycle biases for ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning. J Geod 86(8):579–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0537-0
Geng J, Chen X, Pan Y, Mao S, Li C, Zhou J, Zhang K (2019a) PRIDE PPP-AR: an open-source software for GPS PPP ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 23(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0888-1
Geng J, Chen X, Pan Y, Zhao Q (2019b) A modified phase clock/bias model to improve PPP ambiguity resolution at Wuhan University. J Geod 93(10):2053–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01301-6
Geng J, Guo J, Wang C, Zhang Q (2021a) Satellite antenna phase center errors: magnified threat to multi-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution. J Geod 95(6):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01526-4
Geng J, Yang S, Guo J (2021b) Assessing IGS GPS/Galileo/BDS-2/BDS-3 phase bias products with PRIDE PPP-AR. Satell Navig. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-021-00049-9
Geng J (2022) Recommendations for Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution (PPP-AR). In: IGS 2022 Virtual Workshop, 27 June–1 July
Håkansson M, Jensen ABO, Horemuz M, Hedling G (2017) Review of code and phase biases in multi-GNSS positioning. GPS Solut 21(3):849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0572-7
Hatch R (1982) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Satellite Doppler Positioning at Physical Sciences Laboratory of New Mexico State University. Feb. 8–12, Vol. 2, pp 1213–1231
Johnston G, Riddell A, Hausler G (2017) The International GNSS Service. In: Teunissen PJG, Montenbruck O (eds) Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 967–982
Katsigianni G, Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Zajdel R, Sośnica K (2019) Improving Galileo orbit determination using zero-difference ambiguity fixing in a Multi-GNSS processing. Adv Sp Res 63(9):2952–2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.08.035
Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2009.tb01750.x
Laurichesse D (2011) The CNES Real-time PPP with undifferenced integer ambiguity resolution demonstrator. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp 654–662
Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Capdeville H, Marty JC (2012) Zero-difference GPS ambiguity resolution at CNES-CLS IGS Analysis Center. J Geod 86(11):991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0559-2
Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the Global Positioning System. Rockville, Maryland, USA, pp 373–386
Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P (2014) Differential Code Bias Estimation using Multi-GNSS Observations and Global Ionosphere Maps. Navigation 61(3):191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.64
Montenbruck O, Schmid R, Mercier F, Steigenberger P, Noll C, Fatkulin R, Kogure S, Ganeshan AS (2015) GNSS satellite geometry and attitude models. Adv Sp Res 56(6):1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.019
Rothacher M, Schmid R (2010) ANTEX: the antenna exchange format version 1.4 International GNSS Service. Pasadena California, USA
Schaer S, Villiger A, Arnold D, Dach R, Prange L, Jäggi A (2021) The CODE ambiguity-fixed clock and phase bias analysis products: generation properties and performance. J Geod 95(7):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01521-9
Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the earth’s ionosphere using the Global Positioning System. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Schaer S (2016) SINEX_BIAS—Solution (Software/technique) INdependent EXchange Format for GNSS BIASes Version 1.00. In: IGS Workshop on GNSS biases, Bern, Switzerland, November 5–6, 2015
Schmid R, Rothacher M (2003) Estimation of elevation-dependent satellite antenna phase center variations of GPS satellites. J Geod 77(7–8):440–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-003-0339-0
Schmid R, Steigenberger P, Gendt G, Ge M, Rothacher M (2007) Generation of a consistent absolute phase-center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas. J Geod 81(12):781–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0148-y
Steigenberger P, Thoelert S, Montenbruck O (2020) GPS III Vespucci: results of half a year in orbit. Adv Space Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.026
Strasser S, Mayer-Gürr T, Zehentner N (2019) Processing of GNSS constellations and ground station networks using the raw observation approach. J Geod 93(7):1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1223-2
Strasser S (2022) Reprocessing Multiple GNSS Constellations and a Global Station Network from 1994 to 2020 with the Raw Observation Approach. Ph.D. Thesis Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
Villiger A, Dach R (2021) International GNSS Service Technical Report 2020 (IGS Annual Report). Bern, Switzerland
Villiger A, Schaer S, Dach R, Prange L, Sušnik A, Jäggi A (2019) Determination of GNSS pseudo-absolute code biases and their long-term combination. J Geod 93(9):1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01262-w
Wanninger L, Sumaya H, Beer S (2017) Group delay variations of GPS transmitting and receiving antennas. J Geod 91(9):1099–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1012-3
Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the Global Positioning System. Rockville, Maryland, USA, pp 403–412
Xin S, Geng J, Guo J, Meng X (2020) On the choice of the third-frequency Galileo signals in accelerating PPP ambiguity resolution in case of receiver antenna phase center errors. Remote Sens 12(8):1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS12081315
Zhu SY, Massmann FH, Yu Y, Reigber C (2003) Satellite antenna phase center offsets and scale errors in GPS solutions. J Geod 76(11–12):668–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0294-1
Acknowledgements
We thank Sebastian Strasser for providing reference satellite attitudes and the IGS analysis centers for providing Repro3 satellite products. The work for generating WHU clock/bias products and PPP-AR processing was facilitated by the supercomputing system at Wuhan University. This work is coordinated within the IGS PPP-AR Working Group. The National Science Foundation of China (42025401) and Hubei Luojia Laboratory (220100021) funded this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JG developed the initial concepts and designed the research. JL detailed the concepts and drafted the paper. JL, ZY, and QZ performed the experiment. JG and SM revised the paper. All authors approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, J., Geng, J., Yan, Z. et al. Correcting antenna phase center effects to reconcile the code/phase bias products from the third IGS reprocessing campaign. GPS Solut 27, 70 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01405-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01405-9