Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generating GPS satellite fractional cycle bias for ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of precise point positioning (PPP), the School of Geodesy and Geomatics (SGG) at Wuhan University is now routinely producing GPS satellite fractional cycle bias (FCB) products with open access for worldwide PPP users to conduct ambiguity-fixed PPP solution. We provide a brief theoretical background of PPP and present the strategies and models to compute the FCB products. The practical realization of the two-step (wide-lane and narrow-lane) FCB estimation scheme is described in detail. With GPS measurements taken in various situations, i.e., static, dynamic, and on low earth orbit (LEO) satellites, the quality of FCB estimation and the effectiveness of PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) are evaluated. The comparison with CNES FCBs indicated that our FCBs had a good consistency with the CNES ones. For wide-lane FCB, almost all the differences of the two products were within ±0.05 cycles. For narrow-lane FCB, 87.8 % of the differences were located between ±0.05 cycles, and 97.4 % of them were located between ±0.075 cycles. The experimental results showed that, compared with conventional ambiguity-float PPP, the averaged position RMS of static PPP can be improved from (3.6, 1.4, 3.6) to (2.0, 1.0, 2.7) centimeters for ambiguity-fixed PPP. The average accuracy improvement in the east, north, and up components reached 44.4, 28.6, and 25.0 %, respectively. A kinematic, ambiguity-fixed PPP test with observation of 80 min achieved a position accuracy of better than 5 cm at the one-sigma level in all three coordinate components. Compared with the results of ambiguity-float, kinematic PPP, the positioning biases of ambiguity-fixed PPP were improved by about 78.2, 20.8, and 65.1 % in east, north, and up. The RMS of LEO PPP test was improved by about 23.0, 37.0, and 43.0 % for GRACE-A and GRACE-B in radial, tangential, and normal directions when AR was applied to the same data set. These results demonstrated that the SGG FCB products can be produced with high quality for users anywhere around the world to carry out ambiguity-fixed PPP solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) Global mapping functions (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304. doi:10.1029/2005GL025546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case K, Kruizinga G, Wu S (2010) GRACE level 1B data product user handbook, vers 1.3. JPL Publication D-22027, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena

  • Chen XM, Herbert Landau, Zhang FP, et al (2013) Towards a precise Multi-GNSS positioning system enhanced for the Asia-Pacific region. In: Proceedings of China satellite navigation conference (CSNC). Lecture Notes In Electrical Engineering, vol 245, pp 277–290

  • Collins P, Lahaye F, Héroux P, Bisnath S (2008) Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2008, Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, 1315-1322

  • Collins P, Bisnath S, Lahaye F, Héroux P (2010) Undifferenced GPS ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model and ambiguity datum fixing. J Inst Navigat 57(2):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (eds) (2007) Bernese GPS software Version 5.0. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Defraigne P, Bruyninx C (2007) On the link between GPS pseudorange noise and day-boundary discontinuities in geodetic time transfer solutions. GPS Solut 11(4):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Teferle FN, Shi C, Meng X, Dodson AH, Liu J (2009) Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data. GPS Solut 13(4):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Meng X, Dodson AH, Teferle FN (2010) Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison. J Geod 84(9):569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo QY (2014) Precision comparison and analysis of four online free PPP services in static positioning and tropospheric delay estimation. GPS Solut. doi:10.1007/s10291-014-0413-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch R (1982) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on satellite doppler positioning at Physical Sciences Laboratory of New Mexico State University, vol. 2, pp 1213–1231

  • Ji S, Chen W, Ding X, Chen Y, Zhao C, Hu C (2010) Ambiguity validation with combined ratio test and ellipsoidal integer aperture estimator. J Geod 84(10):597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juan JM, Hernández-Pajares M, Sanz J et al (2012) Enhanced precise point positioning for GNSS users. IEEE Trans Geos Rem Sen 50(10):4213–4222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XX, Zhang XH (2012) Improving the estimation of uncalibrated fractional phase offsets for PPP ambiguity resolution. J Navig 65(3):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang XH (2014) Integrating GPS and GLONASS to accelerate convergence and initialization times of precise point positioning. GPS Solut 18(3):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Zhang SJ, Zou XC et al (2010) Precise orbit determination for GRACE with zero-difference kinematic method. Chin Sci Bull 55(7):600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XX, Zhang XH, Ge MR (2011) Regional reference network augmented precise point positioning for instantaneous ambiguity resolution. J Geod 85(3):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Capdeville H, Marty J (2012) Zero-difference GPS ambiguity resolution at CNES-CLS IGS analysis center. J Geod 86(11):991–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, pp 373–386

  • Montenbruck O, Garcia-Fernandez M, Yoon Y, Schön S, Jaggi A (2009) Antenna phase center calibration for precise positioning of LEO satellites. GPS Solut 13(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging of satellites. In: Henriksen S, Mancini A, Chovitz B (eds) The use of artificial satellites for geodesy, geophysics monograph series. AGU, Washington DC, vol 15, pp 247–251

  • Schmid R, Rothacher M, Thaller D, Steigenberger P (2005) Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas. GPS Solut 9(4):283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber G (2003) Satellite geodesy: foundations, methods, and applications. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, p 276

  • Shi JB, Gao Y (2014) A comparison of three PPP integer ambiguity resolution methods. GPS Solut 18(4):519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart L, Nievinski FG, Santos M (2012) Ray-traced slant factors for mitigating the tropospheric delay at the observation level. J Geod 86(2):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinbach U, Schön S (2013) Improved GRACE kinematic orbit determination using GPS receiver clock modeling. GPS Solut 17(4):511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geod 18(2):91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, pp 403–412

  • Zhang XH, Forsberg R (2007) Assessment of long-range kinematic GPS positioning errors by comparison with airborne laser altimetry and satellite altimetry. J Geod 81(3):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XH, Li XX (2010) A new method for zero-differenced integer ambiguity resolution and its application to PPP. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 35(6):657–660 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XH, Li P (2013) Assessment of correct fixing rate for precise point positioning ambiguity resolution on global scale. J Geod 87(6):579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XH, Li P, Guo F (2013) Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data for global single receiver. Adv Space Res 51(1):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41474025, 41374035, 41304005). The authors are grateful to the many individuals and organizations worldwide who contribute to the International GNSS Service. Special thanks to Tomoji Takasu, who developed the open-source RTKLIB software for reference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, People’s Republic of China

    Pan Li, Xiaohong Zhang, Xiaodong Ren, Xiang Zuo & Yuming Pan

Authors
  1. Pan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaohong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaodong Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiang Zuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuming Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Zhang, X., Ren, X. et al. Generating GPS satellite fractional cycle bias for ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning. GPS Solut 20, 771–782 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0483-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0483-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation