Skip to main content
Log in

Blacks and whites differ in responses, but not tolerance, to orthostatic stress

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This study tested the hypothesis that normotensive black males differ from white males in their autonomic and cardiovascular responses to severe orthostatic stress. College age men (9 blacks, 9 whites) underwent graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP; 10 mmHg steps of 6 min each) to either –100 mmHg or presyncope. LBNP tolerance between the two groups did not differ (LBNP tolerance index: 378 ± 34 vs 404 ± 19mmHg·min, blacks vs whites). Responses to LBNP common to all subjects (≤ –40 mmHg), including spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (sequence technique), did not differ between groups except whites experienced an earlier and more pronounced decline in total peripheral conductance than blacks (P < 0.01). At test termination, the heart rate variability measure of low frequency/high frequency ratio increased more in blacks than whites (5.2 ± 1.1 vs 2.7 ± 0.7 units; P < 0.05) while cardiac output and total peripheral conductance were lower in whites (both P < 0.05). These data suggest that blacks and whites have similar LBNP tolerances. They maintain blood pressure equally well when exposed to graded LBNP to presyncope, yet they differ in their mechanisms for doing so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren D. Franke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, W.D., Lee, K., Buchanan, D.B. et al. Blacks and whites differ in responses, but not tolerance, to orthostatic stress. Clin Auton Res 14, 19–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-004-0155-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-004-0155-5

Key words

Navigation