Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations

  • JPR Symposium
  • Carbon cycle process in East Asia
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) status in forest ecosystems can change upon establishment of plantations because different tree species have different nutrient cycling mechanisms. This study was carried out to evaluate C and N status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in three adjacent plantations consisting of one deciduous (larch: Larix leptolepis) and two evergreen (red pine: Pinus densiflora; rigitaeda pine: P. rigida × P. taeda) species planted in the same year (1963). Both the pine plantations showed comparatively higher C input from needle litter but significantly lower N concentration and input than the larch plantation (P < 0.05). During the decomposition process, the deciduous larch needle litter showed low C concentration and C remaining in soil, but high N concentration and N remaining in soil compared to the two evergreen pine needle litters. However, the soil C and N concentration and their content at a soil depth of 0–10 cm were not affected significantly (P > 0.05) by the plantation type. These results demonstrate the existence of considerable variation in C and N status resulting from needle litter input and litter decomposition in these three plantations grown at sites with similar environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker TT III, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meiner CE, Stanturf JA, Burke MK (2001) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1334–1347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Laskowski R (2006) Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv Ecol Res 38:20–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bert D, Danjon D (2006) Carbon concentration variations in the roots stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). For Ecol Manage 222:279–295. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D (1995) The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns. In: Mead DJ, Cornforth IS (eds) Proceeding of the trees and soil workshop. Lincoln University Press, Canterbury, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR, Gorham E (1964) Litter production in forests of the world. Adv Ecol Res 2:101–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 595–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li BL (2003) Change in soil carbon and nutrient storage after human disturbance of a primary Korean pine forest in northeast China. For Ecol Manage 186:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, van Breemen N, Canham CD (1998) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:440–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Son Y (1992) Differences in soil and leaf litterfall nitrogen dynamics for five forest plantations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1959–1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H, Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Gundersen P, Sevel L, Bastrup-Birk A, Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J (2009) Litterfall and nutrient in five tree species in a common garden experiment. For Ecol Manage 257:2133–2144. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang J, Son Y, Kim C, Yi MJ, Kim ZS, Lee WK, Hong SK (2007) Fine root dynamics in thinned and limed pitch pine and Japanese larch plantations. J Plant Nutr 30:1821–1839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Inventories Programme, pp 3.23–3.68

  • Jeong J, Kim C, An HC, Cho HS, Choo GC (2009) A comparison of litterfall dynamics in three coniferous plantations of identical age under similar site condition. J Ecol Field Biol 32:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamei J, Pandey HN, Barik SK (2009) Tree species distribution and its impact on soil properties, and nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization in a humid subtropical forest ecosystem of northeastern India. Can J For Res 39:36–47. doi:10.1139/X08-151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C (1999) Aboveground nutrient distribution in pitch pine (Pinus rigida) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. J Korean For Soc 88:266–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim C (2008) Soil carbon storage, litterfall, and CO2 efflux in fertilized and unfertilized larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. Ecol Res 23:757–763. doi:10.1007/s11284-007-0436-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C, Koo KS, Byun JK (2005) Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in pine (Pinus rigida) and larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. J Korean For Soc 94:302–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim C, Son Y, Lee WK, Jeong J, Noh N (2009) Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea. For Ecol Manage 257:1420–1426. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Forest Service (2006) Statistical year book of forestry (in Korean). Korea Forest Service, Daejeon City, Korea

  • Li Q, Moorhead DL, DeForest JL, Henderson R, Chen J, Jensen R (2009) Mixed litter decomposition in a managed Missouri Ozark forest ecosystem. For Ecol Manage 257:688–694. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore TR, Trofymow JA, Prescott CE, Fyles J, CIDET Working Group, Titus BD (2006) Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing foliar litter in Canadian forests. Ecosystems 9:46–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polyakova O, Billor N (2007) Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manage 253:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6. 4th edn, vol 2. Cary, NC

  • Son Y, Gower ST (1992) Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution for five plantation species in southwestern Wisconsin. For Ecol Manage 53:175–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son Y, Lee IK (1997) Soil nitrogen mineralization in adjacent stands of larch, pine and oak in central Korea. Ann Sci For 54:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soon YK, Abboud S (1991) A comparison of some methods for soil organic carbon determination. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22:943–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Wang S, Zhang J (2009) Assessing the effects of vegetation types on carbon storage fifteen years after reforestation on a Chinese fir site. For Ecol Manage 258:1437–1441. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Wang C, Wang X, Quan X (2009) Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. For Ecol Manage 258:722–727. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank two reviewers for providing valuable comments of the manuscript. This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (KRF-2006-331-F00024, A307-K001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choonsig Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, C., Jeong, J., Cho, HS. et al. Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations. J Plant Res 123, 403–409 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0317-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0317-6

Keywords

Navigation