Skip to main content
Log in

Advances in business process management implementation based on a maturity assessment and best practice exchange

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the implementation of Business Process Management in a large international company. The business case illustrates the main objectives and approach taken with the BPM initiative. Central element of the BPM implementation was the development of a process framework which consists of a reference process house (RPH) and common methods for process management across the company. In order to assess the implementation of Business Process Management and the achievements a process management maturity assessment was developed and implemented. The maturity model is based on nine categories which comprehensively cover all aspects which impact the success of Business Process Management. Some findings of the first assessment cycle are pinpointed to illustrate the benefits and best practice exchange as a result of the assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern D, Clouse A, Turner R (2004) CMMI distilled: a practical introduction to integrated process improvement. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Delfmann P (eds) (2007) Reference modeling—efficient information systems design through reuse of information models, Springer, Berlin

  • Becker J, Kugeler M, Rosemann M (eds) (2003) Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer, Berlin

  • Business Process Management Maturity Model (BPMM) of OMG, see http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/08-06-01.pdf (called 2009-10-31)

  • Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) of CarnegieMellonUniversity, see http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/ (called 2009-10-31)

  • Chrissis M, Konrad M, Shrum S (2006) CMMIGuidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford J (2001) Project management maturity model. New York

  • Davis F (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. In MIS Quarterly 13:319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmayer J, Seidenschwarz W (2005) Marktorientiertes Prozessmanagement: Wie Process Mass Customization Kundenorientierung und Prozessstandardisierung integriert, Hanser, Munich

  • Fettke P, Loos P (eds) (2007) Reference modeling for business system analysis, idea group

  • Fettke P, Loos P, Zwicker J (2006) Business process reference models: survey and classification. In: Business process management workshops, lecture notes BPM 2005. Springer, Berlin

  • Fisher DM (2004) The business process maturity model, a practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization, available at business process trends: http://www.bptrends.com/resources_publications.cfm (called 2009-10-31)

  • Forrester E, Buteau B, Shrum S (2009) CMMI for service: guidelines for superior service. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher B, Phillips M, Richter K, Shrum S (2009) CMMI-ACQ: guidelines for improving the acquisition of products and services. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2007) The process audit, In: harvard business review (April 2007), pp 111–123

  • Hofmann H, Yedlin D, Mishler J, Kushner S (2007) CMMI for Outsourcing: guidelines for Software, Systems, and IT Acquisition. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüffner T (2007) The BPM maturity model- towards a framework for assessing the business process management maturity of organisations. Master thesis, University of Karlsruhe, GRIN Publishing

  • Lee J, Lee D, Kang S (2007) An overview of the business process maturity model (BPMM). In: Shan H, China J (eds) Advances in web and network technologies, and Information management, APWeb/WAIM 2007 international workshops, LNCS 4537, Springer, Berlin, pp 384–395

  • Moody D (2003) The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In Proceedings of 11th European conference on information systems (ECIS 2003), Naples

  • Paulk M, Weber C, Curtis B, Crissis M (1993) Capability maturity model for software, Version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, http://www.sei.cmu.edu (called 2009-10-31) RefMod: CC reference modeling, http://www.ercis.de/ERCIS/research/competencecenter/refmod/index.html (called 2009-10-31)

  • PMMA: Process Management Maturity Assessment, V. 3.1 (2006) Siemens AG CIO, internal documentation, Munich

  • Process Management Implementation Guide V. 1.0 (2005) Siemens AG CIO, internal documentation, Munich

  • Rosemann M, de Bruin T (2005)Towards a business process management maturity model. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg

  • Rosemann M, de Bruin T, Hueffner T (2004) A model for business process management maturity. In: ACIS 2004 Proceedings of the Australasian conference on information systems, Hobart

  • Rosemann M, de Bruin T, Power B (2006) A model to measure bpm maturity and improve performance. In: Jeston J, Nelis J (eds) Business process management: practical guidelines for successful implementation. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer A-W (1994) Business process engineering: reference models for industrial enterprises. Springer, Berlin

  • Scheer A-W (2000) ARIS—Business process modeling, Springer, Berlin et al.

  • SCOR: Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, Version 9, see http://www.supply-chain.org/cs/root/home (called 2009-10-31)

  • Smith H, Fingar P (2004) Process management maturity models. Available at business process trends: http://www.bptrends.com/resources_publications.cfm (called 2009-10-31)

  • SPF (2005) Siemens Process Framework (2005), Siemens AG CIO internal documentation, Munich

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rohloff.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 73 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohloff, M. Advances in business process management implementation based on a maturity assessment and best practice exchange. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 9, 383–403 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0137-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0137-1

Keywords

Navigation