Abstract
In this paper, we determine all conformal minimal immersions of 2-spheres in quaternionic projective spaces \(HP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In 1976, Nakagawa and Takagi studied some properties about Kähler imbeddings of compact Hermitian symmetric spaces in the complex projective space \(CP^n\) and gave a classification of Kähler submanifolds in \(CP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form (cf. [8]). In 1984, Ros decided the compact Einstein Kähler submanifold in \(CP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form (cf. [9]). In 1985, Tsukada classified \(2n\)-dimensional totally complex submanifolds in \(HP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form into eight types (cf. [10, 11]). Recently, we studied conformal minimal immersions of 2-spheres in \(CP^n\) and \(G(k,N)\) with parallel second fundamental form, and obtained some geometric properties of them (cf. [6, 7]).
In this paper, our interest is to study classification of conformal minimal immersions from \(S^2\) to the quaternionic projective space \(HP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form by the theory of harmonic maps. Here, we regard \(HP^n\) as a totally geodesic totally real submanifolds in complex Grassmann manifolds \(G(2,2n+2)\) and obtain the following classification theorem:
Theorem 1.1
Let \(\varphi :S^2\rightarrow HP^n\) be a linearly full conformal minimal immersion, and let \(K\) and \(B\) be its Gauss curvature and second fundamental form respectively. If \(B\) is parallel, then, up to a symplectic isometry of \(HP^n\), it belongs to one of the following minimal immersions.
-
(1)
\(\varphi =\left[ (\sqrt{3}\overline{z}+\sqrt{3}\overline{z}^2j,~-1+ 2z\overline{z}-2\overline{z}j-z\overline{z}^2j)^T\right] : S^2\rightarrow HP^1\), with \(K=\frac{2}{3},\Vert B\Vert ^2=\frac{8}{3}\);
-
(2)
\(\varphi =\left[ (1,~z)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^1\subset HP^1\), with \(K=2, ~B=0\);
-
(3)
\(\varphi =\left[ (1,~\sqrt{2}z,z^2)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^2\subset HP^2\), with \(K=1, ~\Vert B\Vert ^2=2\);
-
(4)
\(\varphi =\left[ (1-\frac{1}{2}\overline{z}^3j, ~\sqrt{3}z+ \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\overline{z}^2j, ~\frac{3}{2}z^2,~\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}z^3)^T\right] : S^2\rightarrow HP^3\), with \(K=\frac{2}{3}, ~\Vert B\Vert ^2=\frac{1}{3}\);
-
(5)
\(\varphi =\left[ (-2\overline{z},~\sqrt{2}-\sqrt{2}z\overline{z},~2z)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^2\subset HP^2\), with \(K=\frac{1}{2}, ~B=0\);
-
(6)
\(\varphi =\left[ (6\overline{z}^2,~-6\overline{z}+6z\overline{z}^2, ~\sqrt{6}-4\sqrt{6}z\overline{z}+ \sqrt{6}z^2\overline{z}^2,~6z-6z^2\overline{z}, ~6z^2)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^4\subset HP^4\), with \(K=\frac{1}{6}, ~\Vert B\Vert ^2 = \frac{2}{3}\).
Further, no two of the above six cases are congruent, i.e., there is no symplectic isometry which transforms one case into another.
2 Preliminaries
(A) For any \(N=1,2,\ldots ,\) let \(\left\langle ,\right\rangle \) denote the standard Hermitian inner product on \(\mathbb {C}^{N}\) defined by \(\left\langle z, w\right\rangle = z_1\overline{w}_1 +\cdots + z_N\overline{w}_N\), where \(z=(z_1, \ldots , z_N)^T, w=(w_1, \ldots , w_N)^T\in {\mathbb {C}}^N\) and \(\bar{\,}\) denote complex conjugation. Let \(\mathbb {H}\) denote the division ring of quaternions. Let \(j\) be a unit quaternion with \(j^2=-1\). Then, we have an identification of \({\mathbb {C}}^2\) with \(\mathbb {H}\) given by making \((a,b)\in {\mathbb {C}}^2\) correspond to \(a+bj\in \mathbb {H}\); let \(n \in \left\{ 1,2,\ldots \right\} \), and we have a corresponding identification of \({\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\) with \({\mathbb {H}}^n\). For any \(a+bj\in \mathbb {H}\), the left multiplication by \(j\) is given by \(j(a+bj)=-\overline{b}+\overline{a}j\); the conjugation is given by \(\overline{a+bj}=\overline{a}-bj\); the positive-definite inner product is given by \(\left\langle x,y\right\rangle _{\mathbb {H}}=Re(x\overline{y})\) for any \(x,y\in \mathbb {H}\).
Let \(\mathbf {J}:{\mathbb {C}}^{2n} \rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\) be the conjugate linear map given by left multiplication by \(j\), i.e.,
Then, \({\mathbf {J}}^2=-id\) where \(id\) denotes the identity map on \({\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\). In fact, for any \(v\in {\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\),
where \(J_n=diag \underbrace{\left\{ \left( \begin{array} {lr} 0 &{} -1 \\ 1 &{} 0 \\ \end{array}\right) , \ldots , \left( \begin{array} {lr} 0 &{} -1 \\ 1 &{} 0 \\ \end{array}\right) \right\} }_{n}\).
By the above, we immediately have the following lemma (cf. [1]).
Lemma 2.1
The operator \(\mathbf {J}\) has the following properties:
-
(i)
\(\left\langle {\mathbf {J}}v, {\mathbf {J}}w\right\rangle =\left\langle w, v\right\rangle \) for all \(v,w\in {\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\);
-
(ii)
\(\left\langle {\mathbf {J}}v, v\right\rangle =0\) for all \(v\in {\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\);
-
(iii)
\(\partial \circ {\mathbf {J}}=\mathbf {J} \circ \overline{\partial }\), \(\overline{\partial } \circ \mathbf {J}=\mathbf {J} \circ \partial \);
-
(iv)
\(\mathbf {J}(\lambda v)=\overline{\lambda } \mathbf {J} v\) for any \(\lambda \in {\mathbb {C}}\), \(v\in {\mathbb {C}}^{2n}\).
Let \(G(2,2n+2)\) denote the Grassmann manifold of all complex \(2\)-dimensional subspaces of \({\mathbb {C}}^{2n+2}\) with its standard Kähler structure. The quaternionic projective space \(HP^{n}\) is the set of all one-dimensional quaternionic subspaces of \({\mathbb {H}}^{n+1}\). Throughout the above, we shall regard \(HP^{n}\) as the totally geodesic submanifold of \(G(2,2n+2)\) given by
Let \(Sp(n+1)=\left\{ g\in GL(n+1;\mathbb {H}), \ g^*g=I_{n+1}\right\} \) be the symplectic isometry group of \(HP^{n}\), here \(I_{n+1}\) is the identity matrix. The explicit description is that the following diagram commutes:
where \(i_1,i_2\) are inclusions and \(\pi _1,\pi _2\) are projections, and \(i_1(g)=U\), for \(1\le a,b\le n+1\)
where \(A=(A_{b}^{a}),~D=(D_{b}^{a})\in M_{n+1}(\mathbb {C}),~g=A+\overline{D}j\in Sp(n+1);\)
Here, we take the standard metric on \(G(2,2n+2)\) as described in section 2 of [7]; then, the metric induced by \(i_2\) is twice as much as the standard metric on \(HP^{n}\).
Thus, a harmonic map from \(S^2\) to \(HP^n\) is precisely a harmonic map from \(S^2\) to \(G(2,2n+2)\) which has image in \(i_2(HP^n)\).
Then, for any \(g\in Sp(n+1)\), the action of \(g\) on \(HP^{n}\) induces an action of \(i_1(g)\) on \(CP^{2n+1}\), where \(i_1(g)\in U(2n+2)\) commutes with \({\mathbf {J}}\). We shall retain \(g\) to also denote \(i_1(g)\). Then
In the following, we deal with the symplectic isometry of \(HP^{n}\) through the corresponding symplectic isometry of \(CP^{2n+1}\).
(B) In this section, we give general expression of some geometric quantities about conformal minimal immersions from \(S^2\) to \(HP^n\) (cf. [7]).
Let \(M\) be a simply connected domain in the unit sphere \(S^2\) and let \((z,\overline{z})\) be complex coordinates on \(M\). We take the metric \(ds^2_M=dzd\overline{z}\) on \(M\). Denote
We consider the complex Grassmann manifold \(G(2,N)\) as the set of Hermitian orthogonal projections from \({\mathbb {C}}^N\) onto a \(2\)-dimensional subspace in \({\mathbb {C}}^N\). Then, a map \(\psi :S^2\rightarrow G(2,N)\) is a Hermitian orthogonal projection onto a \(2\)-dimensional subbundle \(\underline{\psi }\) of the trivial bundle \({\underline{\mathbb {C}}}^N=M\times {\mathbb {C}}^N\) given by setting the fibre of \(\underline{\psi }\) at \(x\), \({\underline{\psi }}_x\), equal to \(\psi (x)\) for all \(x\in M\). We say that \(\underline{\psi }\) is a harmonic subbundle if \(\psi \) is harmonic (cf. [3]).
Let \(\varphi : S^2 \rightarrow HP^{n}\) be a conformal minimal immersion. The map \(i_2\circ \varphi :S^2 \rightarrow G(2,2n+2)\) may be represented via the local sections of the subbundle \(\underline{Im}(i_2\circ \varphi )\) by the projection map (cf. [7], (2.10)):
where \(X\in \underline{Im}(i_2\circ \varphi )\) is a unit column vector in \(\mathbb {C}^{2n+2}\), and \(X\) and \({\mathbf {J}}X\) are naturally orthogonal.
Denote \(i_2\circ \varphi \) by \(\varphi _0\) (in the following, we will use this notation all the time). Suppose that the metric induced by \(\varphi _0\) is \(ds^2=\lambda ^2dzd\overline{z}\). Let \(K\) and \(B\) be its Gauss curvature and second fundamental form, respectively. From section 2 and 3 of [7], we have
where \(P=\partial \left( {A_z}/{\lambda ^2}\right) \) with \(A_z=\left( 2\varphi _0-I\right) \partial {\varphi _0}\), and \(I\) is the identity matrix, then \(P^*=\overline{\partial }\left( {A_z^*}/{\lambda ^2}\right) ,~A_z^*=-A_{\overline{z}}\).
3 The proof of main theorem
We recall that an immersion of \(S^2\) in \(HP^n\) is conformal and minimal if and only if it is harmonic (cf. [4], Sec 10.6). Thus, we shall consider the immersive harmonic maps from \(S^2\) to \(HP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form for the reducible and irreducible cases to give the proof of Theorem 1.1 in Sect. 1. At first, we state a conclusion about parallel minimal immersions of 2-spheres in \(G(k,N)\) as follows:
Lemma 3.1
([7]) Let \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow G(k,N)\) be a conformal minimal immersion with the second fundamental form \(B\). Then \(B\) is parallel if and only if the equation
holds.
(I) Let \(\varphi :S^2\rightarrow HP^n\) be a linearly full reducible harmonic map, then by ([1], Proposition 3.7) we know that \(\varphi \) is a quaternionic mixed pair or a quaternionic Frenet pair. In the following, we discuss the two cases of \(\varphi \) with parallel second fundamental form, respectively.
(Ia) If \(\varphi \) is a linearly full quaternionic Frenet pair, then
where \(\underline{f}_0^{(2n+1)},~\underline{f}_1^{(2n+1)}, \ldots , ~\underline{f}_{2n+1}^{(2n+1)}:S^2 \rightarrow CP^{2n+1}\) is the harmonic sequence generated by a linearly full totally \(\mathbf {J}\)-isotropic map \(\underline{f}_0^{(2n+1)}\).
Firstly, we recall ([1], §3) that a full holomorphic map \(\underline{f}_0^{(2n+1)} : S^2 \rightarrow CP^{2n+1}\) in the following harmonic sequence satisfying \({\underline{f}}_{2n+1}^{(2n+1)}={\mathbf {J}}\underline{f}_0^{(2n+1)}\) is said to be totally \(\mathbf {J}\)-isotropic,
where \(A'_{j}(v)=\pi _{{f_{j}^{(2n+1)}}^{\perp }}(\partial v), \quad A''_{j}(v)=\pi _{{f_{j}^{(2n+1)}}^{\perp }}(\overline{\partial } v)\) for \(v\in C^{\infty }({\underline{f}}_{j}^{(2n+1)})\), here \(\pi _{{f_{j}^{(2n+1)}}^{\perp }}\) denotes orthogonal projection onto bundle \({{\underline{f}}_{j}^{(2n+1)}}^{\perp }\) and \(C^{\infty }({\underline{f}}_{j}^{(2n+1)})\) denotes the vector space of smooth sections of bundle \({\underline{f}}_{j}^{(2n+1)}\), \(j=0,\ldots ,2n+1\).
Let \(f_0^{(2n+1)}\) be a holomorphic section of \({\underline{f}} _0^{(2n+1)}\), i.e., \(\overline{\partial } f_0 ^{(2n+1)} = 0\), and let \(f_j^{(2n+1)}\) be a local section of \({\underline{f}}_{j}^{(2n+1)}\) such that
for \(j=1, \ldots ,2n+1\). Then, we have some formulas as follows (cf. [2]):
where \(l_j ^{(2n+1)}= |f_{j+1}^{(2n+1)}|^2/ |f_j^{(2n+1)}|^2\) for \(j =0, \ldots , 2n+1\), and \(l_{-1} ^{(2n+1)}= l_{2n+1}^{(2n+1)}=0\).
Since \({\underline{f}} _0^{(2n+1)}\) is totally \(\mathbf {J}\)-isotropic, in a similar fashion to ([2], Lemma 7.1) we obtain
And set \(\mathbf {J} f_0^{(2n+1)}=\tau _0 f_{2n+1}^{(2n+1)}\) , then
where \(j=0, \ldots , n\).
Obviously, \(\varphi _0\) belongs to the following harmonic sequence (cf. [3])
where \(A'_{\varphi _0}(v)=\pi _{\varphi _0^{\perp }}(\partial v), \quad A''_{\varphi _0}(v)=\pi _{\varphi _0^{\perp }}(\overline{\partial } v)\) for \(v\in C^{\infty }(\underline{\varphi }_0)\), here \(\pi _{\varphi _0^{\perp }}\) denotes orthogonal projection onto bundle \(\underline{\varphi }_0^{\perp }\) and \(C^{\infty }(\underline{\varphi }_0)\) denotes the vector space of smooth sections of bundle \(\underline{\varphi }_0\).
From (3.2), we have \(\varphi _0=\frac{{f}_n^{(2n+1)}({f}_n^{(2n+1)})^*}{|{f}_n^{(2n+1)}|^2}+\frac{{f}_{n+1}^{(2n+1)}({f}_{n+1}^{(2n+1)})^*}{|{f}_{n+1}^{(2n+1)}|^2}\). Then by (2.1), (3.3) and a series of calculations, we obtain
Now, we prove that if \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow HP^n\) is a linearly full quaternionic Frenet pair with parallel second fundamental form, then, up to \(Sp(n+1)\), it belongs to the following case: (1) \(\varphi =\left[ (\sqrt{3}\overline{z}+\sqrt{3}\overline{z}^2j,-1+2z\overline{z}-2\overline{z}j-z\overline{z}^2j)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow HP^1,\) with \(K=\frac{2}{3},||B||^2=\frac{8}{3}\).
If \(\varphi \) is a linearly full quaternionic Frenet pair with parallel second fundamental form, then applying Lemma 3.1 and substituting (3.5) into (3.1), we get
Since the second fundamental form of the map \(\varphi \) is parallel, its Gauss curvature is a constant (cf. [7], Theorem 4.5). We know up to \(U(2n+2)\), \(\underline{f}_0^{(2n+1)}\) is a Veronese surface by ([5], Lemma 4.1). Then from [2], we have \(\underline{f}_0^{(2n+1)}, \underline{f}_1^{(2n+1)}, \ldots , \underline{f}_{2n+1}^{(2n+1)}\) is the Veronese sequence in \(CP^{2n+1}\), up to \(U(2n+2)\). So, from ([2], Section 5), we get
where \(i=0,\ldots ,2n+1,~j=0,\ldots ,2n\).
Substituting (3.7) into (3.6), we get
which implies \(n=1\), since \(n\) is a positive integer. Hence,
where \(\underline{V}_1^{(3)}\) is a Veronese surface in \(CP^3\subset CP^{2n+1}\) with the standard expression given in ([2], §5), and \(U\in U(2n+2)\) satisfies \(J_{n+1} \overline{U} \overline{V}_0^{(3)}=\lambda U V_3^{(3)}\) (\(\lambda \) is a parameter).
Set \(U^{T}J_{n+1}U=\overline{W}\), then we immediately get
where \(I\) is the identity matrix.
Define a set
For a given \(W\), the following can be easily checked
-
(i)
\(\forall \ g\in Sp(n+1), \ U\in G_W\), we have that \(gU\in G_W\);
-
(ii)
\(\forall \ U, V \in G_W, \ \exists \ g=UV^* \in Sp(n+1) \ s.t. \ U=gV\).
Then, we discuss the type of \(W\) to get the type of the corresponding \(U\). From ([2], section 5), we get
Then, by (3.9) and (3.10) we get the type of \(\overline{W}\) as follows:
From \(\overline{W}\overline{U}^T = U^T J_{n+1}\), the corresponding \(U=\left[ e_1,e_2,\ldots ,e_{2n+1},e_{2n+2}\right] ^T\) satisfy
where \(e_i\) are unit column vectors in \(\mathbb {C}^{2n+2}\).
Without loss of generality, in this case we choose
By(3.11)–(3.13), we get \(e_2=\overline{W}\overline{e}_1=(0,0,0,-1,\ldots ,0)^T\) and \(e_4=\overline{W}\overline{e}_3=(0,0,1,0,\ldots ,0)^T\), obviously \(\{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4\}\) are mutually orthogonal. Next, we choose a unit column vector \(e_5=(0,0,0,0,*)^T\in \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}\), which satisfies \(\{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5\}\) are mutually orthogonal. Set \(e_6=\overline{W}\overline{e}_5\), then \(\{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_6\}\) are mutually orthogonal. Since \(\left\langle e_6,~e_5\right\rangle =e_5^TW^Te_5=-tr(e_5e_5^TW)=0\), then \(\{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5,e_6\}\) are mutually orthogonal.
Generally, suppose \(\{e_1,e_2,\ldots ,e_{2p-3},e_{2p-2}=\overline{W}\overline{e}_{2p-3}\}~(p\ge 3)\) are mutually orthogonal, we choose a unit column vector \(e_{2p-1}=(0,0,0,0,*)^T\in \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}\) such that \(\{e_1,e_2,\ldots ,e_{2p-3},e_{2p-2},e_{2p-1}\}\) are mutually orthogonal. Set \(e_{2p}=\overline{W}\overline{e}_{2p-1}\), then
and for any \(2\le q\le p\),
Thus \(\{e_1,e_2,\ldots ,e_{2p-3},e_{2p-2},e_{2p-1},e_{2p}\}\) are mutually orthogonal.
So, we can choose \(n-1\) proper unit column vectors \(e_{2p+1}=(0,0,0,0,*)^T\in \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}~(2\le p\le n)\) such that \(\{e_1,e_2,\ldots ,e_{2n+1},e_{2n+2}=\overline{W}\overline{e}_{2n+1}\}\) are mutually orthogonal, and the type of the corresponding \(U\) is as follows:
Thus, we have
Obviously, in this case \(\varphi \) is congruent to the case (1) with \(K=\frac{2}{3},~\Vert B \Vert ^2=\frac{8}{3}\).
(Ib) If \(\varphi \) is a linearly full quaternionic mixed pair, then
where \(\underline{f}_0^{(m)} :S^2 \rightarrow CP^{m} \subseteq CP^{2n+1}\) (\(n\le m\le 2n+1\)) is holomorphic and \({\underline{f}}_1^{(m)} \perp {\mathbf {J}}{\underline{f}_0^{(m)}}\).
Obviously, \(\varphi _0\) belongs to the following harmonic sequence
As in the case (Ia), let \(f_0^{(m)}\) be a holomorphic section of \({\underline{f}} _0^{(m)}\), i.e., \(\overline{\partial } f_0 ^{(m)} = 0\), and \(f_j^{(m)}\) \(~(j=1,\ldots ,m)\) satisfy the corresponding formulas. From (3.15), we have \(\varphi _0=\frac{{f}_0^{(m)}({f}_0^{(m)})^*}{|{f}_0^{(m)}|^2}+\frac{({\mathbf {J}} {f}_0^{(m)})({\mathbf {J}} {f}_0^{(m)})^*}{|{f}_{0}^{(m)}|^2}\). Then by (2.1) and a series of calculations, we obtain
Now, we prove that if \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow HP^n\) is a linearly full quaternionic mixed pair with parallel second fundamental form, then, up to \(Sp(n+1),\) it belongs to one of the following three cases: (2) \(\varphi =\left[ (1,~z)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^1\subset HP^1\), with \(K=2, ~B=0;\)
(3) \(\varphi =\left[ (1,~\sqrt{2}z,z^2)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^2\subset HP^2\), with \(K=1, ~||B||^2=2\);
(4) \(\varphi =\left[ \!(1-\frac{1}{2}\overline{z}^3j,~\sqrt{3}z+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\overline{z}^2j,\frac{3}{2}z^2,\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}z^3)^T\!\right] :S^2\rightarrow \textit{HP}^3,\) with \(K=\frac{2}{3}, ~||B||^2=\frac{1}{3}\).
If \(\varphi \) is a linearly full quaternionic mixed pair with parallel second fundamental form, then applying Lemma 3.1 and substituting (3.17) into (3.1), we get
Since the metric \(ds^2=2l_{0}^{(m)}dzd\overline{z}\) induced by \(\varphi \) is of constant curvature, and the metric induced by \(\underline{f}_0^{(m)}\) is \(ds^2=l_{0}^{(m)}dzd\overline{z}\), then it follows from ([2], Theorem 5.4) that \(\underline{f}_0^{(m)}, \underline{f}_1^{(m)}, \ldots , \underline{f}_{m}^{(m)}\) is the Veronese sequence in \(CP^{m}\subset CP^{2n+1}\), up to \(U(2n+2)\). Then from (3.7) and (3.18) we get
We denote by \(r\) the isotropy order of \(\varphi \) (cf. [3], §3A). If \(r\) is finite, then \(r=2s~(1\le s\le n+1)\) by ([1], Proposition 3.2). Otherwise, \(r = \infty \), in which case \(\varphi \) is called strongly isotropic (cf. [1], section 2C).
If \(m=1\), observing (3.17), we find \(K=2, ~B=0\). It belongs to the case of totally geodesic. If \(m=2\), since \(r\ge 2\), which implies \({\underline{f}}_2^{(2)} \perp {\mathbf {J}}{\underline{f}_0^{(2)}}\) by (3.16), then we have \(\left\langle f_2^{(2)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_1^{(2)}}\right\rangle =\partial \left\langle f_2^{(2)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(2)}}\right\rangle =0\), which implies (3.19) holds. Hence, its second fundamental form is parallel. In fact, the above two cases are both strongly isotropic.
If \(m\ge 3\), from (3.19) we find \(\left\langle f_3^{(m)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(m)}}\right\rangle =-\left\langle f_2^{(m)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_1^{(m)}}\right\rangle \ne 0\), which implies in this case \(r=2\). In the following, we discuss the above three cases, respectively.
Case Ib1, \(m=1\).
In this case, we have
where \(\underline{V}_0^{(1)}\) is a Veronese surface in \(CP^1\subset CP^{2n+1}\) with the standard expression given in ([2], section 5), and \(U\in U(2n+2)\) satisfies \(tr\Big (V_1^{(1)} {V_0^{(1)}}^{T} U^{T}J_{n+1}U\Big )=0\), as this expresses the orthogonality of \(Jf_0^{(1)}\) and \(f_1^{(1)}\).
Similarly, we get the type of \(\overline{W}=U^{T}J_{n+1}U\in U(2n+2)\) as follows:
As in case (1a), by (3.12),(3.13), and (3.21), we get
Since \(\overline{W}\) in (3.21) is a unitary matrix, \(\{e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4\}\) are mutually orthogonal. Similarly, we can choose \(n-1\) proper unit column vectors \(e_{2p+1}=(0,0,*)^T\in \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}~(2\le p\le n)\) such that \(\{e_1,e_2,\ldots ,e_{2n+1},e_{2n+2}=\overline{W}\overline{e}_{2n+1}\}\) are mutually orthogonal, and the type of the corresponding \(U\) is as follows:
Thus, we have
Obviously, in this case \(\varphi \) is congruent to the case (2) with \(K=2,~B=0\).
Case Ib2, \(m=2\).
In this case, we have
where \(\underline{V}_0^{(2)}\) is a Veronese surface in \(CP^2\subset CP^{2n+1}\) with the standard expression given in ([2], §5), and \(U\in U(2n+2)\) satisfies \(tr\Big ( V_1^{(2)} {V_0^{(2)}}^{T} U^{T}J_{n+1}U\Big )=0\), as this expresses the orthogonality of \(Jf_0^{(2)}\) and \(f_1^{(2)}\).
Similarly, we get the type of \(\overline{W}=U^{T}J_{n+1}U\in U(2n+2)\) as follows:
And the type of the corresponding \(U\) is as follows:
Thus, we have
Obviously, in this case \(\varphi \) is congruent to the case (3) with \(K=1,~\Vert B \Vert ^2=2\).
Case Ib3, \(m\ge 3\).
In this case, the trivial bundle \(S^2 \times \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}\) over \(S^2\) has a corresponding decomposition \(S^2 \times \mathbb {C}^{2n+2} = S^2 \times \mathbb {C}^{m+1} \oplus S^2 \times \mathbb {C}^{2n-m+1}\). From (3.16) we set \(\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(m)}}=x_3f_3^{(m)}+x_4f_4^{(m)}+\cdots +x_mf_m^{(m)}+V\), where \(x_i~(i=3,\ldots ,m)\) are complex coefficients and bundle \(\underline{V}\subset S^2 \times \mathbb {C}^{2n-m+1}\). Then, it follows from \(\partial {\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(m)}}}=0\) that
And we have \(\left\langle f_3^{(m)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(m)}}\right\rangle =\overline{x}_3 |f_3^{(m)}|^2\). Then, from ([2], §5) and (3.19) we get
By (3.26) and (3.27), we find \(\partial \overline{\partial }\log \left( |x_3|^2|f_3^{(m)}|^4\right) =\frac{2m-6}{(1+z\overline{z})^2}=0\), which implies \(m=3\), i.e.,
where \(\underline{V}_0^{(3)}\) is a Veronese surface in \(CP^3\subset CP^{2n+1}\) with the standard expression given in ([2], §5), and \(U\in U(2n+2)\) satisfies \(tr\Big ( V_1^{(3)} {V_0^{(3)}}^{T} U^{T}J_{n+1}U\Big )=0\) and \(tr\Big ( V_3^{(3)} {V_0^{(3)}}^{T} U^{T}J_{n+1}U\Big )\ne 0\), as these express \(r=2\).
Similarly, we get the type of \(\overline{W}=U^{T}J_{n+1}U\in U(2n+2)\) as follows:
where \(a_{14}\ne 0\).
In this case, if \(|a_{14}|^2=1\), as in the case (Ia) we choose (3.13), then choose \(n-1\) proper unit column vectors \(e_{2p+1}=(0,0,0,0,*)^T\in \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}~(2\le p\le n)\) such that the type of the corresponding \(U\in U(2n+2)\) is as follows:
Thus, we have
If \(|a_{14}|^2\ne 1\), then we choose
And we choose \(n-3\) proper unit column vectors \(e_{2p+1}=(0,0,0,0,*)^T\in \mathbb {C}^{2n+2}~(4\le p\le n)\) such that the type of the corresponding \(U\in U(2n+2)\) is as follows:
Thus, we have
From (3.30) and (3.32), we have \(\left\langle f_3^{(3)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(3)}}\right\rangle =\left\langle UV_3^{(3)}, ~\mathbf {J}{U V_0^{(3)}}\right\rangle =6a_{14}\). On the other hand, from (3.27) we get \(\left| \left\langle f_3^{(3)}, ~\mathbf {J}{f_0^{(3)}}\right\rangle \right| ^2=9\). So \(a_{14}=\frac{1}{2}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta }~(0\le \theta \le 2\pi )\). Hence, in this case \(\varphi \) is congruent to the case (4) with \(K=\frac{2}{3},~\Vert B \Vert ^2=\frac{1}{3}\).
(II) Let \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow HP^n\) be an irreducible linearly full harmonic map. At first, we state a conclusion about parallel minimal immersions of 2-spheres in \(G(k,N)\) as follows:
Lemma 3.2
([7]) Let \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow G(k,N)\) be a conformal minimal immersion with the second fundamental form \(B\). Suppose that \(B\) is parallel, then the following equations
hold.
By [1], we know \(\varphi _0\) belongs to the following harmonic sequence
where \(\underline{\varphi }_0=\underline{i_2\circ \varphi },~\underline{\varphi }_{-1}={\mathbf {J}}\underline{\varphi }_{1},~\underline{\varphi }_{-2}={\mathbf {J}}\underline{\varphi }_{2}\).
We choose a unit column vector \(X\in \underline{\varphi }_0\), then we have
where \(X_1=\partial {X}-\left\langle \partial {X},X\right\rangle X-\left\langle \partial {X},\mathbf {J}X\right\rangle \mathbf {J}X\) and \(Y_1=\partial {\mathbf {J}X}-\left\langle \partial {\mathbf {J}X},X\right\rangle X-\left\langle \partial {\mathbf {J}X},\mathbf {J}X\right\rangle \mathbf {J}X\). Here, \(X_1\) and \(Y_1\) are not orthogonal in general.
Let
Then, from (3.35), we have
where \([X_1,Y_1]^*[X,\mathbf {J}X]=[-\mathbf {J}Y_1,\mathbf {J}X_1]^*[X,\mathbf {J}X]=0\).
From (3.37) and the identity \(\partial \overline{\partial }=\overline{\partial }\partial \), we get
From (3.35), we have \(\varphi _0=XX^*+({\mathbf {J}} X)({\mathbf {J}} X)^*\). Then by (2.1), a straightforward calculation shows
Since \(\varphi _0\) is harmonic, the corresponding equivalent condition \(\overline{\partial }A_z+A_zA_z^*-A_z^*A_z=0\) (cf. [12]) implies
Now, we prove that if \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow HP^n\) is an irreducible linearly full harmonic map with parallel second fundamental form, then, up to \(Sp(n+1),\) it belongs to one of the following two cases: (5) \(\varphi =\left[ (-2\overline{z},~\sqrt{2}-\sqrt{2}z\overline{z},~2z)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^2\subset HP^2\), with \(K=\frac{1}{2}, ~B=0;\) (6) \(\varphi =\left[ (6\overline{z}^2,~-6\overline{z}+6z\overline{z}^2,~\sqrt{6}-4\sqrt{6}z\overline{z}+\sqrt{6}z^2\overline{z}^2,~6z-6z^2\overline{z}, ~6z^2)^T\right] :S^2\rightarrow CP^4\subset HP^4,\) with \(K=\frac{1}{6}, ~\Vert B\Vert ^2=\frac{2}{3}\).
If \(\varphi :S^2 \rightarrow HP^n\) is an irreducible linearly full harmonic map with parallel second fundamental form, then applying Lemma 3.2 and substituting (3.39) into the first equation of (3.33), we get
From (3.38) and (3.41) we have
Let \(\widetilde{X}\in \underline{\varphi }_0\) be another unit column vector such that \(\underline{\varphi }_0=\underline{\widetilde{X}} \oplus \mathbf {J} \underline{\widetilde{X}}\), then
where \(T:S^2\rightarrow SU(2)\) is to be determined such that \(\widetilde{X}\) satisfies \([\widetilde{X},\mathbf {J}\widetilde{X}]^*d[\widetilde{X},\mathbf {J}\widetilde{X}]=0\). Such \(T\) is a solution of the linear PDE
The integrability condition of (3.44) is just (3.42), so it has a unique solution locally on \(S^2\) for any given initial value. Let \(T\) be a solution of (3.44) with the initial value \(T(0)\in SU(2)\). From (3.44) we have \(d(T^*T)=0\) and \(d|T|=0\), so \(T\in SU(2)\).
Now, we choose a unit column vector \(X\in \underline{\varphi }_0\) such that \(\underline{\varphi }_0=\underline{X} \oplus \mathbf {J} \underline{X}\) and
It follows from (3.40) and (3.45) that
Let \(\underline{f}=[X]:S^2\rightarrow CP^{2n+1}\) be a smooth immersion. Similarly, by calculating the equivalent condition of harmonic, we find \(\underline{f}\) is harmonic by (3.45) and (3.46). Of course, \(\mathbf {J}\underline{f}=[\mathbf {J}X]:S^2\rightarrow CP^{2n+1}\) is also harmonic. So \(\underline{\varphi }_0=\underline{f}\oplus \mathbf {J}\underline{f}\), where \(\underline{f}\) belongs to the following harmonic sequence
As in the case (Ia), let \(f_0\) be a holomorphic section of \({\underline{f}} _0\), i.e. \(\overline{\partial } f_0 = 0\), and \(f_p\) satisfy the corresponding formulas. From (3.41), we know \(l_{p-1}=l_p\), which implies that \(\underline{f}_p\) is totally real by ([2], Theorem 7.3), i.e. \(\underline{f}_p=\underline{f}_m^{(2m)}:S^2\rightarrow RP^{2m}\subset CP^{2m}\subset CP^{2n+1}\), where \(2\le 2m\le 2n+1\). Let \(f_p={f}_m^{(2m)}\) satisfy the corresponding formulas, then in harmonic sequence (3.34) by (3.40) and (3.45) we have
where \(l_i^{(2m)}=l_{2m-1-i}^{(2m)}\ (i=0,\ldots ,m-1)\) and \(\underline{\varphi }_0,\ \underline{\varphi }_1,\ \underline{\varphi }_2\) are mutually orthogonal.
At this time, from (3.48), we have \(\varphi _0=\frac{{f}_m^{(2m)}({f}_m^{(2m)})^*}{|{f}_m^{(2m)}|^2}+\frac{({\mathbf {J}} {f}_m^{(2m)})({\mathbf {J}} {f}_m^{(2m)})^*}{|{f}_{m}^{(2m)}|^2}\). Then by (2.1) and a series of calculations, we obtain
Then applying Lemma 3.2 and substituting (3.49) into the second equation of (3.33), we get \(m=1\) or
In the latter case, since \(l_{m+1}^{(2m)}=\frac{(m+2)(m-1)}{(1+z\overline{z})^2}\) and \(l_{m}^{(2m)}=\frac{(m+1)m}{(1+z\overline{z})^2}\) by ([2], §5), we have \(m=2\) by (3.50). Hence, in the following, we discuss the above two cases of \(m=1\) and \(m=2\) respectively.
Case II1, \(m=1\).
In this case, by (3.50) we have
where \(\underline{V}_1^{(2)}\) is a Veronese surface in \(CP^2\subset CP^{2n+1}\) with the standard expression given in ([2], Section 5) and \(U\in U(2n+2)\) satisfies \(tr\Big ( V_2^{(2)} {V_0^{(2)}}^{T} U^{T}J_{n+1}U\Big )=0\), as this expresses the orthogonality of \(Jf_0^{(2)}\) and \(f_2^{(2)}\).
By calculating, we find in this case \(\overline{W}=U^{T}J_{n+1}U\in U(2n+2)\) is the same type as (3.24). Then, the type of the corresponding \(U\in U(2n+2)\) is the same as (3.25). Thus, we have
In this case, it is easy to check that the corresponding map \(\varphi \) is totally geodesic. Obviously, it is congruent to the case (5) with \(K=\frac{1}{2},~B=0\).
Case II2, \(m=2\).
In this case, by (3.50) we have
where \(\underline{V}_2^{(4)}\) is a Veronese surface in \(CP^4\subset CP^{2n+1}\) with the standard expression given in ([2], Section 5) and \(U\in U(2n+2)\) satisfies \(tr\Big ( V_4^{(4)} {V_0^{(4)}}^{T} U^{T}J_{n+1}U\Big )=0\), as this expresses the orthogonality of \(Jf_0^{(4)}\) and \(f_4^{(4)}\).
Similarly, we get the type of \(\overline{W}=U^{T}J_{n+1}U\in U(2n+2)\) as follows:
And the type of the corresponding \(U\in U(2n+2)\) is as follows:
Thus, we have
In this case, it is easy to check that the Eq. (3.1) holds, which shows the second fundamental form of the corresponding map \(\varphi \) is parallel. Obviously, it is congruent to the case (6) with \(K=\frac{1}{6},~||B||^2=\frac{2}{3}\).
It is easy to check that no two of the above six cases are congruent, i.e., we cannot transform any one into any other by left multiplication by \(Sp(n+1)\). To sum up, we get Theorem 1.1.
References
Bahy-El-Dien, A., Wood, J.C.: The explicit construction of all harmonic two-spheres in quaternionic projective spaces. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 62, 202–224 (1991)
Bolton, J., Jensen, G.R., Rigoli, M., Woodward, L.M.: On conformal minimal immersion of \(S^2\) into \(CP^N\). Math. Ann. 279, 599–620 (1988)
Burstall, F.E., Wood, J.C.: The construction of harmonic maps into complex Grassmannians. J. Differ. Geom. 23, 255–297 (1986)
Eells, J., Lemaire, L.: A report on harmonic maps. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 10, 1–68 (1978)
He, L., Jiao, X.X.: Classification of conformal minimal immersions of constant curvature from \(S^2\) to \(HP^2\). Math. Ann. doi:10.1007/s00208-014-1013-y
Jiao, X.X., Peng, J.G.: On some conformal minimal two-spheres in a complex projective space. Q. J. Math. 61(1), 87–101 (2010)
Jiao, X.X.: On minimal two-spheres immersed in complex Grassmann manifolds with parallel second fundamental form. Monatsh. Math. 168, 381–401 (2012)
Nakagawa, H., Takagi, R.: On locally symmetric Kaehler submanifolds in a complex projective space. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 28(4), 638–667 (1976)
Ros, A.: On spectral geometry of Kaehler submanifolds. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 36(3), 433–447 (1984)
Tsukada, K.: Parallel submanifolds in a quaternion projective space. Osaka J. Math. 22, 187–241 (1985)
Tsukada, K.: Einstein-Kaehler submanifolds in a quaternion projective space. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 36, 527–536 (2004)
Uhlenbeck, K.: Harmonic maps into Lie groups (classical solutions of the chiral model). J. Differ. Geom. 30, 1–50 (1989)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express gratitude for the referee’s comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the NSFC (Grant No. 11331002).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, L., Jiao, X. On conformal minimal immersions of \(S^2\) in \(HP^n\) with parallel second fundamental form. Annali di Matematica 194, 1301–1317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-014-0420-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-014-0420-8
Keywords
- Conformal minimal 2-spheres
- Parallel second fundamental form
- Classification
- Quaternionic projective space