Abstract
Previous studies with English-speaking children showed that handwriting and spelling abilities played a critical role in the development of writing fluency and quality, particularly during the transition from the kindergarten to primary school; in contrast, studies dealing with orthographically transparent languages found small or no relations between transcription skills and writing competence. The present study examined the question of whether, in a transparent language like Italian, spelling and handwriting abilities predicted the narrative competence of primary-school children, and whether their effects varied as a function of grade. To this purpose, 150 Italian-speaking children (77 boys and 73 girls), attending the third, fourth, and fifth grades, were examined: they underwent an assessment of receptive vocabulary and wrote a fictional story starting from a keyword. Written compositions were scored for handwriting quality, spelling errors, productivity, syntactic complexity, and the use of narrative categories. A hierarchical regression analysis showed that, after eliminating the contributions of receptive vocabulary and productivity measures, only handwriting quality was significantly and positively related to the number of narrative categories utilized by children. In addition, the impact of the two transcription skills did not vary across grades. These findings suggest that, in a transparent language like Italian, spelling ability has a limited influence on the development of narrative competence in primary-school children (at least after the third grade). On the other hand, extensive practice in handwriting might have beneficial effects, by freeing resources that children might utilize to improve the structural organization of written narratives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Robot” was included in the animate category because many currently available robots exhibit life-like behaviors (Bartneck et al. 2009), and children have been shown to hold “animistic intuitions” that they use to attribute intelligence, biology, and agency to nonliving robots (Okita and Schwartz 2006).
References
Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478.
Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298. doi:10.1037/a0019318.
Arfé, B., Dockrell, J. E., & Bernardi, B. (2016). The effect of language specific factors on early written composition: the role of spelling, oral language and text generation skills in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing, 29, 501–527. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9617-5.
Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23, 539–568. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y.
Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive–linguistic skills and literacy skills: new insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 169–189. doi:10.1037/a0021671.
Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., & Mahmud, A. A. (2009). Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(2), 195–204.
Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing, 4, 257–280. doi:10.1007/BF01027151.
Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A. C., Yates, C. M., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing, 6, 161–196. doi:10.1007/BF01026911.
Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K. B., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Rogan, L. W., Brooks, A., Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652–666. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.652.
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620. doi:10.1080/00207599408248175.
Camaioni, L., Longobardi, E., & Bellagamba, F. (1998). Evoluzione dei termini di stati mentali nelle storie di fantasia scritte da bambini in età scolare. Età Evolutiva, 60, 20–29.
Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 479–492.
Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: a national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919.
Dinehart, L. H. (2015). Handwriting in early childhood education: Current research and future implications. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15, 97–118. doi:10.1177/1468798414522825.
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). The contribution of executive functions to narrative writing in fourth grade children. Reading and Writing, 28, 989–1011. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9558-z.
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). How executive functions predict development in syntactic complexity of narrative writing in the upper elementary grades. Reading and Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9670-8.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115.
Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98. doi:10.2307/1511268.
Graham, S., & Harris, R. K. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2.
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: a new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170.
Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1–9. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620.
Grazzani, I., & Ornaghi, V. (2012). How do use and comprehension of mental-state language relate to theory of mind in middle childhood?. Cognitive Development, 27, 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.03.002.
Hamstra-Bletz, L., & Blöte, A. W. (1990). Development of handwriting in primary school: A longitudinal study. Perceptual And Motor Skills, 70, 759–770. doi:10.2466/PMS.70.3.759-770.
Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Cognitive processes in writing: a framework. In B. Arfé, J. Dockrell, & V. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia, or oral language problems: implications for assessment and instruction (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1987). On the structure of the writing process. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, 19–30. doi:10.1097/00011363-198709000-00004.
Hughes, D. C., Keeling, B., & Tuck, B. F. (1983). Effects of achievement expectations and handwriting quality on scoring essays. Journal Of Educational Measurement, 20, 65–70. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00190.x.
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign: National Council of Teachers of English.
Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. (2012). Indicazioni nazionali per ilcurricolo della scuola dell’infanzia e del primo ciclo d’istruzione [National guidelines for the curriculum of nursery and elementary school]. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://indicazioninazionali.it.
Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: a longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437.
Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Otaiba, A., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: the role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing, 27, 1163–1188. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1.
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Puranik, C. (2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 57, 199–211. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0152).
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Wamzek, J., & Gatlin, B. (2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 79–95. doi:10.1037/a0037210.
Klein, J., & Taub, D. (2005). The effect of variations in handwriting and print on evaluation of student essays. Assessing Writing, 10, 134–148.
Larsen, S. C., & Hammill, D. D. (1989). Test of legible handwriting. Austin: Pro-Ed.
Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 401–413, doi:10.1037/a0031391.
Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Fidalgo, R. (2014). Children’s high-level writing skills: development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 177–193. doi:10.1111/bjep.12020.
Longobardi, E., & Baldi, S. (2014). Velocità di scrittura e ortografia nella produzione del testo scritto in età scolare [Handwriting speed and spelling in the production of written texts in school-age]. Psicologia dell’educazione, 8(3), 367–380.
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Renna, M., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2014). Comparing fictional, personal and hypothetical narratives in primary school: story grammar and mental state language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 257–275.
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2016). Relations between theory of mind, mental state language and social adjustment in primary-school children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 424–438.
Mäki, H. S., Voeten, M. J., Vauras, M. M., & Poskiparta, E. H. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing, 14, 643–672. doi:10.1023/A:1012071514719.
Mäkinen, L., Loukusa, S., Nieminen, L., Leinonen, E., & Kunnari, S. (2014). The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, referential cohesion and event content in four- to eight-year-old Finnish children. First Language, 34, 24–42.
Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2008). Handwriting–A forgotten language skill? Language And Education, 22, 34–47. doi:10.2167/le722.0.
Miller, J., & Chapman, R. (2001). Systematic analysis of language transcripts [computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Waisman Center, Language Analysis Laboratory.
Muñoz, M. L., Gillam, R. B., Peña, E. D., & Gulley-Faehnle, A. (2003). Measures of language development in fictional narratives of Latino children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 332–342.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). National Assessment of Educational Progress [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://nationsreportcard.gov/writing_2007.
Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring written language ability in narrative samples. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23, 287–309. doi:10.1080/10573560701277807.
Norbury, C. F., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Narrative skills of children with communication impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 287–313.
Notarnicola, A., Angelelli, P., Judica, A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2012). Development of spelling skills in a shallow orthography: the case of Italian language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1171–1194. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9312-0.
Okita, S. Y., & Schwartz, D. L. (2006). Young children’s understanding of animacy and entertainment robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3(3), 393–412.
Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21, 3–26. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1.
Ornaghi, V., Brockmeier, J., & Grazzani, I. (2014). Enhancing social cognition by training children in emotion understanding: A primary school study. Journal Of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 26–39. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.005.
Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Gamannossi, B. A., & Vezzani, C. (2009). Emergent literacy and learning to write: a predictive model for Italian language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 61–78. doi:10.1007/BF03173475.
Pinto, G., Tarchi, C., & Bigozzi, L. (2015). The relationship between oral and written narratives: a three‐year longitudinal study of narrative cohesion, coherence, and structure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 551–569. doi:10.1111/bjep.12091.
Price, J. R., Roberts, J. E., & Jackson, S. C. (2006). Structural development of the fictional narratives of African American preschoolers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 178–190.
Puranik, C. S., & Al Otaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25, 1523–1546. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x.
Puranik, C. S., Lombardino, L. J., & Altmann, L. J. (2008). Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 107–120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012).
Rogers, J., & Case-Smith, J. (2002). Relationship between handwriting and keyboarding performance of sixth-grade students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 34–39.
Russo, M. R., Tucci, R., Cornoldi, C., Tressoldi, P., Vio, C., Bilancia, G., Di Brina, C., Borean, M., Bravar, L., Zoia, S., & Iozzino, R. (2011). Criteri per la diagnosi disgrafia: una proposta del gruppo di lavoro AIRIPA [Criteria for the diagnosis of dysgraphia: a proposal of the AIRIPA workgroup]. Retrieved from: http://airipa.it/materiali/materiali-utili.
Soodla, P., & Kikas, E. (2010). Macrostructure in the narratives of Estonian children with typical development and language impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 53, 1321–1333.
Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stella, G., Pizzioli, C., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2000). Il Peabody Test. Test di vocabolario recettivo. Torino: Omega.
Stevenson, N. C., & Just, C. (2014). In early education, why teach handwriting before keyboarding? Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 49–56.
Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s writing: a function of working memory or reading or both processes? Reading and Writing, 8, 357–383. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0054.
Tressoldi, P. E., & Cornoldi, C. (1991). Batteria per la valutazione della scrittura e della competenza ortografica nella scuola dell’obbligo [BVSCO, Battery for the assessment of writing and orthographic competence in compulsory schooling]. Firenze, Italy: Giunti OS.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing highlights 2002 [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.
Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L. G., Tschinkel, E., & Kantor, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24, 203–220. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7.
Weintraub, N., Gilmour-Grill, N., & Weiss, P. L. (2010). Relationship between handwriting and keyboarding performance among fast and slow adult keyboarders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(1), 123–132.
West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Emiddia Longobardi. Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University Sapienza of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy. E-mail: emiddia.longobardi@uniroma1.it
Emiddia Longobardi. Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University Sapienza of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy. E-mail: emiddia.longobardi@uniroma1.it
Current themes of research:
Language development; gestural communication; pragmatic abilities; adult-child interaction; text composition; language assessment; theory of mind.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2016). Relations between theory of mind, mental state language, and social adjustment in primary-school children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 424–438.
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Renna, M., Rossi-Arnaud C. (2014). Comparing fictional, personal and hypothetical narratives in primary school: story grammar and mental state language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(2), 257–275.
Longobardi, E., Rossi-Arnaud, C., Spataro, P. (2011). Longitudinal examination of early communicative development: evidence from a parent report questionnaire. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 572–592.
Longobardi, E., Rossi-Arnaud, C., Spataro, P. (2012). Individual differences in the prevalence of words and gestures in the second year of life: developmental trends in Italian children. Infant Behavior & Development, 35, 847–859.
Pietro Spataro. Department of Psychology, University Sapienza of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. E-mail: pietro.spataro@uniroma1.it
Current themes of research:
Language development; implicit memory; working memory; attention.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Putnick, D., Bornstein, M.H. (2015). Noun and verb production in maternal and child language: continuity, stability, and prediction across the second year of life. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 183–198.
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Frigerio, A., Rescorla, L. (2015). Language and social competence in typically developing children and late talkers between 18 and 35 months of age. Early Child Development and Care, 186(3–4), 436–452.
Longobardi, E., Rossi-Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., Putnick, D., Bornstein, M.H. (2015). Children’s acquisition of nouns and verbs in Italian: contrasting the role of frequency and positional salience in maternal language. Journal of Child Language, 42(1), 95–121.
Cottini, M., Pieroni, L., Spataro, P., Devescovi, A., Longobardi, E., Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2015). Featuring binding and the processing of global-local shake in bilingual and monolingual children. Memory & Cognition, 43, 441–452.
Emiliano Pizzicannella. Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, University Sapienza of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy. E-mail: epizzicannella@gmail.com
Current themes of research:
Language development; text composition; language assessment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P. & Pizzicannella, E. Handwriting, spelling, and narrative competence in the fictional stories of Italian primary-school children. Eur J Psychol Educ 33, 277–293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0328-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0328-y